Isn't it about time they lived by the Laws they retain or create ?
They will probably both be in Court (as I suspect they will (in some manner) sooner or later) to 'name' one of them as the driver. Or perhaps like that Cornish couple both end up with fines and points ?
If the politicians flaunt the Law themselves should they not be suspended from office immediately and then removed if found guilty ?
or would there be no politicians left, as I recall some years back it was shown that something like half of the politicians
at that time were guilty of a crime!

If they take their own rules with such disregard, does it not tell us, clearly, just how little 'importance' or how 'necessary' they are? And therefor, they should withdraw that Law immediately.
If it were a genuine 'mistake' then an admittance of guilt to aid the whole process and a change in behaviour would be expected.
To flaunt two laws in a fairly brief time period, questions whether he considers himself above the Laws of the Land, or that those Laws are of no relevance to him for safe driving.
Or was it a mistake ?
Could he have had a hand-free but it broke or battery died or in a different car and failed to remember to take it with him ? Perhaps a genuine important call came through and for a moment he took it, maybe even to say "hang on" and got 'snapped' ?
Would we be giving him 'such' a hard time if it was someone else ? Everyone can make a genuine mistake ... What if he came out and said -"I disagree with these Laws and see no relevance to Road Safety within them" ?
One reason why technical offences are not necessarily a reflection of whether someone was driving safely or not.