B cyclist wrote:
How to deal with it? Should they be taken off the roads? Well, clearly that would be unacceptable publicly because they have had the right for so long, they (apparently) pay through the nose for it, and I'm sure if you asked them they'd say that they were good, safe and experienced drivers and it was everyone else that was a numpty.
Should they be educated? Well, yes - I think this is the answer. Education in two ways: firstly how to drive properly - as a good, safe, experienced driver would and secondly to obey the existing laws and rules of the road. If you want them to choose the right lane or have their fog lights off in the rain you also have to get them to obey road sings and speed limits. I don't think picking one aspect of driving and saying "you choose" whilst picking another and saying "you don't choose on this one" is a good approach.
And all driver education already includes obeying speed limits and the general rules of the road anyway, including the advanced courses which many including myself have recommended.
I don't believe this campaign has ever said "you choose" should be its line on speed limits, and that certainly isn't my view. I do not oppose speed limits as such, nor do I believe that they should never, or virtually never, be enforced. However, I do believe that in recent years excessive emphasis has been placed on strict speed limit compliance as a road safety tool, which has proved to be at best ineffective, at worst counter-productive.
Any enforcement of any law must pass a twin test of:
(a) is it in the public interest in terms of its overall objectives, and
(b) is it proportionate to the gravity of the the offence being committed
I believe the scale and indiscriminate nature of current speed limit enforcement policy fails on both counts. Just because you
can enforce a law doesn't mean that you
should in all cases. As former US Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara famously said, "Measure what is important, don't make important what you can measure". Replace "measure" with "enforce" and that applies equally to current traffic enforcement. I have no problem with the age of consent being 16 - but I don't think it would be in the public interest to devote huge amounts of resources to indentifying 16-year-old boys sleeping with 15-year-old girls and then hauling them before the courts.
It is also important that the laws being enforced are generally viewed as reasonable by those subjected to them, which in the case of speed limits is more than more not the case. To quote the Arizona Department of Transportation in their policy document on speed limits, "The normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable individual should be considered legal." Sadly that is increasingly not the case on Britain's roads today. Laws unworthy of respect will not be respected.