Why mention it ?
It has been said before; too many signs make driving harder than it should be.
Roundabouts with so many signs you cannot see oncoming traffic spring to mind.
What one of the newspaper aticles failed to mention, in the diatribe about how "drivers have to drive more carefully", is that it also forces pedestrians and cyclists to think as well. Much more important is that the dumbo with the ipod is forced to confront the reality of the world about him/her.
In any case, it will be hard, uphill, work trying to get it done anywhere near the uk....too many councils would have to be forced to think....a road without a multitude of signs telling you that there is a hill somewhere near....and that every side road is a 20 zone, with humps, and old people, and children, and that it is a no-cold-calling zone, with no parking on each side (on alternate days), with the flashing 20 sign (that is always wrong)(on a no-through-road)(with sign).
Quote:
Signs indicating nearby cashpoints, wi-fi hotspots and drive-thru takeaways would all be useful additions to the Highway Code, the survey found.
And a host of new warning signs pointing out the risk of urban foxes and skateboarders would also help drivers.
Some other signs – like the “children crossing” sign – should be updated to represent fashion by picturing a boy wearing a “hoodie,” drivers said.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/8783/How+15m+drivers+are+baffled+by+road+signsYeah, real-world-I-don't-think.