Quote:
Shame she didn't have a bit more chemistry between the public, or her cabinet for that matter.
I suspect that, with a science background, she didnt really like politicing that much and was more concerned with getting the job done. this would have angererd the more traditional career politicians.
As for the public, I dont recall her losing any elections! Even the "Poll Tax" issue would have blown over come election time if she had stood her ground as votors would have realised that most of the protesters were people who had spent a lifetime living at the public purses expence and that what really pissed them off was the idea that they should actually contribute a bit.
I remember in my own town one family complaning that as a result of the "Poll tax" their rates on their (subsidised) council house had risen from £300PA to £1500PA (the poll tax level at that time was set at just under £300) This sounds bad, but you have to remember that for this to have taken place this house would have had to have 5 adults, all in work, living in it (Unemployed and higher education were IIRC exempt). The household income (in total) must have been in the order of £40-50,000! (Conservativly! It could easily have been a good bit more) They jolly well deserved to be paying £1500! (and probabally a higher rent too) rather than having their satilite/cable TV and whatever subsidised by the rest of us.
(It was very noticable that when the cable companies moved into this area they headed streight for the council estates offering free connection. The posher parts werent even offererd the option of paying for a connection. Even though the cables actually ran through them on their way to the council housing)