Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Oct 27, 2025 00:53

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 04:08 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
See the European Transport Safety Council's first report on speed:

http://www.etsc.be/documents/Speed%20Mo ... 0final.pdf

And weep. They are playing 'let's pretend' with our lives and our liberty.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 08:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
It's like the last few years never happened.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 09:55 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 17:46
Posts: 823
Location: Saltburn, N. Yorks
How very depressing! :cry:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
I can't understand why KeyMed would be contributing funding to this publication (see foot of last page). They are part of Olympus Optical.

It must be a corporate social responsibility thing.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:44 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 01:48
Posts: 526
Location: Netherlands
Contacts, from the document:

Professor Herman De Croo
Professor Manfred Bandmann
Professor G. Murray Mackay
Professor Pieter van Vollenhoven
Professor Richard Allsop
Paolo Costa
Dirk Sterckx
Dieter-Lebrecht Koch

Dr Jörg Beckmann, Executive director
Antonio Avenoso, Deputy Director
Roberto Cana, Support Officer
Paolo Ferraresi, Financial Officer
Ellen Townsend, Head of Policy
Graziella Jost, Programme Officer
Timmo Janitzek, Policy Officer
Evgueni Pogorelov, Communications Officer
Marco Popolizio, Project Officer
Gabriel Simcic, Project Officer

Perhaps the SafeSpeed campaign could send an email to these people expressing support for their desire to reduce road casualties, but pointing out that focussing limited resources on distracting and skill-dumbing speed enforcement is a failed policy and is NOT the way to achieve this goal. Links and references could be included here.
Then some ponters to more intelligent and effective programs based upon driver education, skill development and effective engineering measures (etc.).

_________________
p.s. I am still absolutely floored by Paul's death. May 2008 be the greatest ever for SafeSpeed. His spirit lives on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 12:58 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 04:11
Posts: 171
Location: South East
Speed Management in the U.K (p5) wrote:
Exceeding the speed limit and traveling too fast for prevailing conditions still cause a large proportion of accidents in the U.K. (26% of fatal accidents in 2005). These figures probably underestimate the true role of excessive speed

So the DfT's own statistics are hereby totally discredited/disowned/dismissed.
??????


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 14:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
where is that figure from... I'm sure Paul has found from DfT's own research that it is in fact 7%?

The best bit is...

Quote:
In the case of automatic enforcement, provide a system that makes
the vehicle owner legally responsible for the violation when the
driver cannot be identified.


"If we can't find who was speeding, nab the owner - we've got to fine someone"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 15:13 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
This lot are Upminster - eight stops beyond Barking. :D

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 18:20 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
The only positive thing I read was the bit about "credible speed limits".

Then I realised they could easily say 20 mph is a credible limit, or 10 mph, so...?


I'm beginning to think a revolution is the only answer. We'll probably follow a lead from France. When they get sick of the government's intervention we'll mirror a figleaf version.

Someone will shoot Brown with a popgun.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 18:30 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
well, i noticed with re: france there were call fors a 30kmp/h limit throughout paris! which is about 16mph isnt it?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 18:40 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
mmltonge wrote:
well, i noticed with re: france there were call fors a 30kmp/h limit throughout paris! which is about 16mph isnt it?


Yep, well 18.64114 mph approximately :)

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 19:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 15:30
Posts: 643
It's an act of pure genius by our normally idiot government. By persuading the rest of Europe to follow our failed road safety policies they will cause Europe to get worse and so the UK will look better until eventually we have the safest roads in Europe again.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 19:41 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Actually, all governments are generally useless. How's this for a story: -


Imagine working for a company that has a little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics:

* 29 have been accused of spousal abuse
* 7 have been arrested for fraud
* 19 have been accused of writing bad checks
* 117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
* 3 have done time for assault
* 71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
* 14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
* 8 have been arrested for shoplifting
* 21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
* 84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year...



Can you guess which organization this is?



Give up yet?





It's the 535 members of the United States Congress.

The same group that crank out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us in line.


Think we're any different? I don't.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 20:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
I wonder what the stats are for the H of C??

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 02:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
How about the proportion who have ever had a proper job in the real world?

Approximately 0%!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
RobinXe wrote:
How about the proportion who have ever had a proper job in the real world?

Approximately 0%!


Interestingly ISTR that (although not everone here is a fan of Maggie) Maggie wanted to be remembered not as the first female PM but the first one with a science degree. Before going into politics she did actually have a proper job as an industrial food chemist!

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 13:30 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
Dusty wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
How about the proportion who have ever had a proper job in the real world?

Approximately 0%!


Interestingly ISTR that (although not everone here is a fan of Maggie) Maggie wanted to be remembered not as the first female PM but the first one with a science degree. Before going into politics she did actually have a proper job as an industrial food chemist!


The only problem is that iirc her claim to fame on that score was inventing MrWhippy.

Still it could be worse, could have been hydrogenated fats she came up with.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 16:01 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Dusty wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
How about the proportion who have ever had a proper job in the real world?

Approximately 0%!


Interestingly ISTR that (although not everone here is a fan of Maggie) Maggie wanted to be remembered not as the first female PM but the first one with a science degree. Before going into politics she did actually have a proper job as an industrial food chemist!


Shame she didn't have a bit more chemistry between the public, or her cabinet for that matter.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 18:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Quote:
Shame she didn't have a bit more chemistry between the public, or her cabinet for that matter.


I suspect that, with a science background, she didnt really like politicing that much and was more concerned with getting the job done. this would have angererd the more traditional career politicians.

As for the public, I dont recall her losing any elections! Even the "Poll Tax" issue would have blown over come election time if she had stood her ground as votors would have realised that most of the protesters were people who had spent a lifetime living at the public purses expence and that what really pissed them off was the idea that they should actually contribute a bit.

I remember in my own town one family complaning that as a result of the "Poll tax" their rates on their (subsidised) council house had risen from £300PA to £1500PA (the poll tax level at that time was set at just under £300) This sounds bad, but you have to remember that for this to have taken place this house would have had to have 5 adults, all in work, living in it (Unemployed and higher education were IIRC exempt). The household income (in total) must have been in the order of £40-50,000! (Conservativly! It could easily have been a good bit more) They jolly well deserved to be paying £1500! (and probabally a higher rent too) rather than having their satilite/cable TV and whatever subsidised by the rest of us.

(It was very noticable that when the cable companies moved into this area they headed streight for the council estates offering free connection. The posher parts werent even offererd the option of paying for a connection. Even though the cables actually ran through them on their way to the council housing)

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 19:10 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Dusty wrote:
... most of the protesters were people who had spent a lifetime living at the public purses expence and that what really pissed them off was the idea that they should actually contribute a bit.

I always thought the concept of a poll tax was so much more sensible than rates, council tax or whatever. People use public services - not property - so all people should pay something towards said services and thus have some "ownership" (management-speak :) ). They thus take more care of public owned assets and take more interest in how money is spent.

The problem was that the implementation of the system wasn't thought through enough.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 371 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.030s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]