nanki_poo wrote:
For all those words, you still have only two arguments:
a) it's not the driver's fault it's the governments. The government doesn't tell me not to run my unpleasant neighbour through with a garden fork, but I ain't going to do it. Anyone who needs to be told such things should not be in charge of either a garden fork or a motor vehicle!!!!
Last time I read my Bible.. it told me "Thou Shalt Not Kill" and this rule has been prominent in most civilised justice systems since Cain killed Abel.
(I am in
the choir .. we sing in the Cathedral too!

)
Quote:
b) get everyone that's not a car off the road because cars make it unsafe. Simple... instant, automatic one-three month ban for:
Parking on School zig-zags.
What if the car just conked out there. Has happened before now.
But yep .. those who do so deliberately .. the mumpties who say they want a cam outside the school too....
Quote:
Exceeding urban speed limits by more than 30%

But then - what if the person is ferryng a sick relative or pal to hospital and conditions are fair and not one other person is around?
Lads and lasses here (and with other forces) might pull and escort. A cam would never use the same discretionary common sense though
We also have to keep any punishments in keeping with the crime committed and a ban for 39 mph in a 30 mph zone and no remedial training or advice is not helpful to any road safety policy.
Also - what if that road was 40 mph last week and is 30 mph this week? It does happen and familiar habit is a tricky thing to beat for some.
Quote:
Driving in compulsory cycle lanes
What if there are road works, series of pot holes in centre of road or an oncoming muppet straddles thw white by a margin - thus forcing the driver to move closer to the kerb or be hit head on?
These are instances where discretion is required. Also - some of the people carriers could be so wide that the nearside wheel could protrude over the solid white.
These are extreme cases - admittedly. But nonetheless mitigating circumstances which any civilised justice and policing system would have to take into account.
Quote:
Driving without DC&A
Still has to be proven beyond reasoned doubt and isnurance companies are full of 50/50 split liabiltity claims on various prangs.
Quote:
I think we'd see an improvement PDQ then. Especially if we lock their car up in the interim. Then a compulsory test to get back on the road.
The same should apply to cycling standards as well. I think the proposal to make all riders wear an idntifiable number on their clothiung would cut red light jumping and various dangersous practices. And yes - I want hiugh standard cycling proficiency offered to all who wish to commute or ride for fun regardless of age.
Quote:
As more children are killed while on foot than on cycles, should we also stop them from walking anywhere?
It's to do with volume. As the figures due out may indicate - we have more tragedies on bikes overall than previous. This does not reflect poor driving standards or cycling standards - but reflects the fact that with higher numbers on bikes - the more likely that some unlucky mishap can occur. It's how we seek to train, educate and police our roads which could reduce or even eradicate these problems.
Quote:
So, your child is definitely safe in your big car (which should make quick work of any child inconsiderate enough to walk/cycle when you f*ck up), but when the myocardial infarcation hits in his/her thirties that's tuff.
Like all these fads and fashions - someone comes along later to contradict. They are now saying that Yoga and Pilates are not that good for backs etc.
Personally I believe that kids should be allowed to be kids and simply
pplay which can mean playing "catcch", "tag" "Hide and seek", "musical chairs" just as much as cycling and normal sport.
Quote:
And the old "well, if you had children..." doesn't work I'm afraid. If I had a child I may make a personal decision not to let them on main roads, but I would not be arguing we should discourage all kids so that I can carry on speeding around for some sort of (probably sexual) deep-seated gratification, I would be campaigning for safer roads and the measures I detail above.
My kids have been taught the Green Cross Code and I have been into schools in the past teaching all children how to use roads safely and confidently.
By the way - where is anyone on here arguing to caryy on "sppeding for some sexual gratification"? I think Mad Doc's brood and my own set of four prove we have very satisfactory marriages

Quote:
Remember, driving is a privelege, not a right.
Which most of us on here obtained by being focussed and committed enough to improve and continually evaluate and improve.
