Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 17:48

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 00:00 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
Ernest Marsh wrote:
It's worth bearing in mind that if traffic lanes are not separated, and the oncoming vehicles are behind a cyclist, it is helpful if you pull over to the left as much as is reasonable or safe, to allow the oncoming vehicles a better chance to pass.

Maybe you all do this already? :roll:


I only do this if I am sure there is enough room. I wave the driver through. Then I reclaim the primary position.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 01:02 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
B cyclist wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
It's worth bearing in mind that if traffic lanes are not separated, and the oncoming vehicles are behind a cyclist, it is helpful if you pull over to the left as much as is reasonable or safe, to allow the oncoming vehicles a better chance to pass.

Maybe you all do this already? :roll:


I only do this if I am sure there is enough room. I wave the driver through. Then I reclaim the primary position.


Alas - there are more poor cyclists than poor drivers around ...mostly kids who need proper instruction.. :roll: or "born again cyclists" who are not at all conversant with any road rules. :roll: In some ways these "born again" are worse than our middle aged "Hells Angels" .....in terms of ability to handle the bike....and honk up the hill.

Of course... if you adopt a primary when you should be in a secondary - and we see you... we have a little "helmet to helmet " chat about Cycle Crafts... :wink:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 01:06 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
B cyclist wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
It's worth bearing in mind that if traffic lanes are not separated, and the oncoming vehicles are behind a cyclist, it is helpful if you pull over to the left as much as is reasonable or safe, to allow the oncoming vehicles a better chance to pass.

Maybe you all do this already? :roll:

I only do this if I am sure there is enough room. I wave the driver through. Then I reclaim the primary position.

I think what he was meaning is that, if you are a driver travelling in the opposite direction to someone else who wants to overtake a cyclist, it makes sense to keep to the left-hand side rather than hogging the crown of the road.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 01:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
PeterE wrote:
B cyclist wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
It's worth bearing in mind that if traffic lanes are not separated, and the oncoming vehicles are behind a cyclist, it is helpful if you pull over to the left as much as is reasonable or safe, to allow the oncoming vehicles a better chance to pass.

Maybe you all do this already? :roll:

I only do this if I am sure there is enough room. I wave the driver through. Then I reclaim the primary position.

I think what he was meaning is that, if you are a driver travelling in the opposite direction to someone else who wants to overtake a cyclist, it makes sense to keep to the left-hand side rather than hogging the crown of the road.


Oh, goodness, that's a difficult one.

On the one hand you help everyone.
On the other you encourage a drive to overtake where they really shouldn't be overtaking...

I know exactly the situation, and when I am driving it's one of those questions I don't want to be asked....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 01:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
In Gear wrote:
B cyclist wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
It's worth bearing in mind that if traffic lanes are not separated, and the oncoming vehicles are behind a cyclist, it is helpful if you pull over to the left as much as is reasonable or safe, to allow the oncoming vehicles a better chance to pass.

Maybe you all do this already? :roll:


I only do this if I am sure there is enough room. I wave the driver through. Then I reclaim the primary position.


Alas - there are more poor cyclists than poor drivers around ...mostly kids who need proper instruction.. :roll: or "born again cyclists" who are not at all conversant with any road rules. :roll: In some ways these "born again" are worse than our middle aged "Hells Angels" .....in terms of ability to handle the bike....and honk up the hill.

Of course... if you adopt a primary when you should be in a secondary - and we see you... we have a little "helmet to helmet " chat about Cycle Crafts... :wink:


I am afraid I have no idea what you are on about.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 01:51 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
B cyclist wrote:
PeterE wrote:
B cyclist wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
It's worth bearing in mind that if traffic lanes are not separated, and the oncoming vehicles are behind a cyclist, it is helpful if you pull over to the left as much as is reasonable or safe, to allow the oncoming vehicles a better chance to pass.

Maybe you all do this already? :roll:

I only do this if I am sure there is enough room. I wave the driver through. Then I reclaim the primary position.

I think what he was meaning is that, if you are a driver travelling in the opposite direction to someone else who wants to overtake a cyclist, it makes sense to keep to the left-hand side rather than hogging the crown of the road.


Oh, goodness, that's a difficult one.

On the one hand you help everyone.
On the other you encourage a drive to overtake where they really shouldn't be overtaking...

I know exactly the situation, and when I am driving it's one of those questions I don't want to be asked....


this one, like nearly all motorist's decisions, is about balancing risks. When in such a position I am sure that there is no possibility of any hazard occurring on my left that might otherwise need me to move out or be out, I maintain a position well to the left. This means that the motorist and cyclist coming toward me can make their own mind up and I am as far out of the way that I reasonably can be. If I cannot be certain that a hazard won't appear or may preexist on the left, I keep out a little, but ready to move in (and cover the brake or if necessary anchor up) in the event of the oncoming car going for the overtake or having made no indication of having spotted the cyclist in his approach, necessitating either a hurried and possibly close overtake or a late braking of his own.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 01:55 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
B cyclist wrote:
I know exactly the situation, and when I am driving it's one of those questions I don't want to be asked....

See my earlier post about 24-foot main roads. You know you can overtake the cyclist, but on the other hand you know you're leaving a less than ideal gap. So do you go for it, or suffer a hooting truck two feet from your back bumper for a couple of miles?

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 04:27 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Quote:
I think what he was meaning is that, if you are a driver travelling in the opposite direction to someone else who wants to overtake a cyclist, it makes sense to keep to the left-hand side rather than hogging the crown of the road.

Exactly. The sort of situation I would do this is where there IS room to pass the cyclist, then give the oncoming vehicle a little less reason to pass close by to the cyclist.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 02:13 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 02:02
Posts: 258
Location: Northern Ireland
Don't push the cyclist along with your wing mirror... That happened me once, and I don't cycle that often.

This bmw was really close to me, and he wouldn't pass, and I started to feel this thing pushing into my back. It was actually really scary, and I was doing 30 at the time, on a single lane road with national speed limit. As far as I know he would have been perfectly capable of passing me, there was a clear road and no bends... But maybe he just saw fit to scare me...

Wonder how many other people have experienced this??


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:47 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
...and don't do what the guy in front of me did today:

As I was about to pass the same cyclist in the same place as every day :roll: , the guy in front (in a tatty old turbodiesel 4x4) waited until the way was clear, then accelerated hard to overtake the him.

Result? a big black cloud for the cyclist to breathe in....

As I drive a TDi myself, I accelerated gently and passed widely.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 09:42 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
mikes1988 wrote:
Don't push the cyclist along with your wing mirror... That happened me once, and I don't cycle that often.

This bmw was really close to me, and he wouldn't pass, and I started to feel this thing pushing into my back. It was actually really scary, and I was doing 30 at the time, on a single lane road with national speed limit. As far as I know he would have been perfectly capable of passing me, there was a clear road and no bends... But maybe he just saw fit to scare me...

Wonder how many other people have experienced this??

I have occasionally found myself being encouraged to pass - driver slows or pulls over - but have chosen not to because I am turning off within a short space of time. However, I never pressure the driver in front to "get a move on" which seems to be the behaviour you are describing. :(

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Quote:
I think what he was meaning is that, if you are a driver travelling in the opposite direction to someone else who wants to overtake a cyclist, it makes sense to keep to the left-hand side rather than hogging the crown of the road.

Exactly. The sort of situation I would do this is where there IS room to pass the cyclist, then give the oncoming vehicle a little less reason to pass close by to the cyclist.


I once did this when being trained on a motorbike. I got told off for doing so. I got told you need to keep an assertive road position at all times. I don't know if this applies to cars.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 21:55 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
PeterE wrote:
B cyclist wrote:
I know exactly the situation, and when I am driving it's one of those questions I don't want to be asked....

See my earlier post about 24-foot main roads. You know you can overtake the cyclist, but on the other hand you know you're leaving a less than ideal gap. So do you go for it, or suffer a hooting truck two feet from your back bumper for a couple of miles?


And if you're leaving a less than ideal gap - no doubt the lorry will go for it - if he's daft enough to be two foot of your bumper - whats a cyclist ( to him)- i'd tend to suffer said lorry untill i could see that both me and lorry could pass cyclist with cyclist in one bit.At least that way i could live with my conscience.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 23:29 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
fergl100 wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Quote:
I think what he was meaning is that, if you are a driver travelling in the opposite direction to someone else who wants to overtake a cyclist, it makes sense to keep to the left-hand side rather than hogging the crown of the road.

Exactly. The sort of situation I would do this is where there IS room to pass the cyclist, then give the oncoming vehicle a little less reason to pass close by to the cyclist.


I once did this when being trained on a motorbike. I got told off for doing so. I got told you need to keep an assertive road position at all times. I don't know if this applies to cars.

I dont think so - what you describe sounds like "defensive" riding, where you create a safety zone around you by assuming a position where you control the space around you by preventing access.
Were you told to ride in the centre of the carriageway or lane, and if in pairs, to ride staggered so as to occupy a whole lane width?

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 05:45 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 16:08
Posts: 54
Is it true that cyclists have the same rights as drivers?

Apart from the motorway :!:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
Pretty much, yes.

http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/

is as good starting point.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 13:17 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
B cyclist wrote:
Pretty much, yes.

http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/

is as good starting point.


:yesyes: Und I do like Rules 45 to 66 - especially 45 und 46 - und 48 (Number 66 ist :D - only cross when Green cycle show! :lol: :boxedin: - ist lonked to tht other thread where people get cross over propoals to change some of these to "MUST" - as if we talk "SHOULD" or "PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION" - ist not change :? It say that anyway - as is now...


und 50 und 52 to 55.

Ist interesting reading - nicht?

I am the person at the pub quiz who can put the number to the code und vice versa!...
:lol:


Und page 82 ist also worth reading :wink:
Ist amazing how many get cross when I get them all right!.... :lol:

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.962s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]