Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Jun 18, 2026 17:28

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 23:41 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
mega link

Speed camera cash hits £1 million

Jan 13 2006

POLICE in Dumfries and Galloway raked in nearly £1 million from speed cameras last year.

Figures released by the Safety Camera Partnership show a total of £993,720 being collected in fine revenue.

This figure makes the region’s speed traps the third highest earners in Scotland behind Strathclyde on £3.04million and Lothian on £3million.

And more than 20,000 drivers have paid the price with a £60 penalty ticket and penalty points on their licence.

However, deaths on the region’s roads have continued to rise ... from nine in 2004 to 17 in 2005.

Campaigners against speed cameras have branded the figures as ‘madness’.

Paul Smith from the Safe Speed Road Safety Campaign believes speed limits should be set according to the individual driving conditions.

He said: “Recent official figures show that speed camera benefits have been overrated by a factor of four.

“The madness that generates nearly £1 million in fines in an area the size of Dumfries and Galloway must end and end soon.

“The speed camera programme has failed.

“It's failed to make the road safer, it's failed to win public confidence.

“All it has done is make money.”

Dumfries and Galloway Safety Camera Partnership operates two mobile speed traps at 14 accident blackspots in the region.

Since the initiative was launched in 2003, the partnership claim an 82 per cent reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured and a 50 per cent reduction in minor casualties at these sites.

And the Safety Camera Partnership says these are the most important figures — not the revenue created by the cameras.

Stuart Hamilton from the partnership said: “Although it is easy to analyse the financial statistics, they should be compared to the casualty statistics specific to the proven crash locations and routes that the partnership enforce on.

“No value can be placed upon the pain of losing a loved one and it is the grief, suffering and trauma that is caused by losing a loved one that we want to reduce.”

Dumfries and Galloway Safety Camera Partnership is currently working towards a road safety target for 2010.

These targets include reducing the number of people killed or seriously injured on the region’s roads by 50 per cent.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 22:53 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 16:14
Posts: 3
The chief constable has put in a desperate letter in today's standard I will try to put it on when I can


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 00:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
lol - 82% reduction? Since when? Last week? :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 01:36 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
hizzy1 wrote:
The chief constable has put in a desperate letter in today's standard I will try to put it on when I can


Interesting. Thanks. I've had a good look around the online version and I can't find any letters at all.

And :welcome:

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 20:46 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 16:14
Posts: 3
Thank you. I have been watching for a while and now is a good time to start posting.
I hope this has worked
Image
It all stinks of double standards to me, every force which has had a reduction in deaths claim cameras are a huge success but if they have gone up the timescale is too short.
When I get time I will also be writing directly to the chief constable


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 22:09 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
hizzy1 wrote:
I hope this has worked


Thanks Hizzy. I've cleaned it up a bit and hosted it:

Image

I agree that it is well deserved of a reply. I'm considering the content of a Safe Speed reply. It might be titled 'Good intentions are not enough'.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 10:58 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
82% reduction in crashes (caused by the cameras according to them)

88% increase in fatalities (But this is caused by not analysing statistics for long enough)

Who are they trying to kid?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.011s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]