Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Nov 13, 2026 21:48

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: agree/disagree
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 21:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 19:53
Posts: 234
No doubt I will.
The one thing we both agree on is why you're there, i.e. to nick people who are guilty of speeding regardless, with road safety not entering into it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 21:54 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
I personally can see the logic in CamOp filming the emergency vehicles and not pulling the trigger. If I were in his position I'd do the same. Depending on the speeds and distances it is probable that the vehicle and its propensity to speed is noted prior to the blues (the two-tone is these days used much less frequently - in my experience only when approaching or stuck in traffic or at a junction).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 21:56 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
camera operator wrote:
now if i saw / heard sirens and i panned the camera away the someone might say i was showing favoritism to the emergency services


That is the most stupid thing I have read today (and i have been marking my pupils work :lol: )


They have those flashing light's on because they need to get some where quickly(ie because people may die). Most of the public understand this, this is why they move out of the way. They don't think, "thats not fair, what right do they have to drive fast!!"

If I drive over limit fine me!!!
These people are tring to save lives, let them do their job :hoppingmad: .

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 22:00 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
and my view, my role is to enforce the speed limit at certain locations (accident spots / residential concern sites), sites that are published in the media, areas that are signposted as camera sites, parking a highly visible ford transit for up to 3 hours,

i do however believe that motorways and dual carraigeways should not be enforced, but until there is a change in the law,

but my Sgt deploys me wherever is needed

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 23:15 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
camera operator wrote:
my role is to enforce the speed limit at certain locations (accident spots / residential concern sites)

no, your role is to enforce the speed limit at locations where the majority of people are exceeding it in order to ensure enough income is generated to pay your wage. If you enforced where there was actually a problem with excessive speed above the limit you'd be out of a job in no time.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 23:28 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
change the record for once will you

i will state again, how can i physically make a driver exceed the speed limit,

at a site i could have say a thousand vehicles pass in say a 3 hour period how many are above the limit quite a few, how many above our prosecution threshold not many

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 00:03 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
camera operator wrote:
change the record for once will you

i will state again, how can i physically make a driver exceed the speed limit,

at a site i could have say a thousand vehicles pass in say a 3 hour period how many are above the limit quite a few, how many above our prosecution threshold not many


The rules for camera placement sends you to places where it is safe to speed.

I know I've posted this link for you before: http://www.safespeed.org.uk/rules.html

As far as I know you haven't commented on it. Have you understood the problem? Apart from 15% of camera hours (complaint sites) your are not allowed to trap motorists where it is dangerous to exceed the speed limit.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 00:35 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
SafeSpeed wrote:
Apart from 15% of camera hours (complaint sites) your are not allowed to trap motorists where it is dangerous to exceed the speed limit.

indeed, if he set up shop in a residential area he might only ping one car every few hours, if that. Hardly 'worth' his while is it? Despite the fact that that one car is probably far more dangerous than the hundreds he is currently persecuting.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 20:25 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
IMO
example 1 - the left hand bend appears a bit sharp, neverthe less an open road, just saw it is a 30mph, is it a long road ? whats the accident history. by just looking at the road the 85% percentile will no doubt be high no visible repeaters, what signage tells the motorist its a 30mph

example 2 - is this place near Peranporth Cornwall seems familiar, no pavement narrow street, pedestrians i doubt very much if a vehicle couldget above 15mph with people / traffic back and for

two totaly different scenarios example 1 without knowing the full facts i cannot really see why it is 30mph if its an accident blackspot 50mph is understanable but 30!!, example 2 candidate for 20mph high season if its the place im thinking of

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 20:28 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
johnsher wrote:
indeed, if he set up shop in a residential area he might only ping one car every few hours, if that. Hardly 'worth' his while is it? Despite the fact that that one car is probably far more dangerous than the hundreds he is currently persecuting.

100% right john, Ianh posted somewhere in here that he was never set targets only the amount of time spent at the site, if you will not take my word for it take his

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 20:32 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
camera operator wrote:
100% right john, Ianh posted somewhere in here that he was never set targets only the amount of time spent at the site, if you will not take my word for it take his

I believe you, that's why the sites are monitored extensively before you're sent there. Gotta make sure the money keeps rolling in.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 13:03 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: Gizmo, you should send that to the Campaign Against Political Correctness. They would absolutely love it.

http://www.capc.co.uk/

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 17:27 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
camera operator wrote:
by just looking at the road the 85% percentile will no doubt be high no visible repeaters, what signage tells the motorist its a 30mph


None, that's what they're banking on! ££££

If the street lights weren't there, it would become 70mph and become a more dangerous (unlit) road.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 17:39 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
camera operator wrote:
IMO
example 1 - the left hand bend appears a bit sharp, nevertheless an open road, just saw it is a 30mph, is it a long road ? whats the accident history. by just looking at the road the 85% percentile will no doubt be high no visible repeaters, what signage tells the motorist its a 30mph

None, they are expected to know this because of the street lights.

The 50 mph signs can be seen in the distance - but this whole road was originally NSL, and the 30 limit (which in theory is there to protect a pedestrian crossing) is way over the top. A much shorter 40 would suffice.

AFAIK the police have never done intensive enforcement of the 30, which is fortunate as virtually nobody abides by it.

Image

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:14 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
if I understand it correctly - camera opp is instructed to film all traffic when casing a location. To demonstrate that he/she does not discriminate.

If this is true, then is cameras opp not using the camera to form the primary opinion speed?

If this is so, then I believe ALL of his/her prosecutions are fatally flawed as there is no offence to answer.

the law clearly states an officer must form the primary opinion of speed before using a speed measuring device to corroborate their opinion. By filming everyone - this is clearly not occuring.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 21:21 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
if you are parked at the side of a 30mph road, then obviously both approaching and departing traffic is filmed, i only pull the trigger if i believe the vehicle is over the speed limit how is the opinion formed departing traffic engine noise on going past the van, visual observation on approaching traffic

i honestly wonder if anyone has actualy seen the equipment working sometimes

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 16:45 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
Is a civilian operator allowed to form a 'prior opinion'?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 19:05 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
no i am not allowed to form a prior opinion, i form an opinion prior to pulling the trigger

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 19:21 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
camera operator wrote:
no i am not allowed to form a prior opinion, i form an opinion prior to pulling the trigger


:?

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 19:22 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
camera operator wrote:
traffic engine noise on going past the van


Are you telling us that you can judge the speed of a vehicle just from the engine noise, without even knowing what gear its in?

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 178 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.023s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]