Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Oct 28, 2025 19:59

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 23:14 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Peyote wrote:
Gatsobait wrote:
It's a natural reaction to the policies that put the scams up in the first place. Drivers want to protect their licences, which is how the scameras are supposed to slow 'em down. But the ability to drive is so important to most drivers that many over react when they see a scam/talivan. From personal observation it seems that many who aren't even speeding will slow down just to make sure they're under 30, irrespective of what the limit actually is. Especially true on 40s and 50s now that so many roads have had unrealistic 30 limits imposed on them. An unfamiliar road and an unexpected Gatso... even if the driver is sure it's a 40 limit he might not want to take the chance, so he hits the anchors.


Hmm... I can see the logic of what you're saying, but am reluctant to absolve drivers of their responsibility to other road users. I guess it's down to personal perspective. I'd argue that drivers should learn not to panic brake when they see the cameras (in fact one could go so far as to use it as an excuse to put more cameras up!). The cameras aren't the origins of the panic braking, it's the drivers response to the cameras that are is the problem. Ergo it's the drivers attitude to the cameras that needs to change.

IMHO. :wink:



Was behind one tonight 30 mph and :banghead: she slows to 20 mph! It's getting to be a natural reaction - I'm starting to anticipated the emergency stop as soon as the bleep starts. Even when we are legal


I'll bet this slow down confuses pedestrains too as they could misjudge speed to below speed limit and than acceleration to speed limit after the scam and Widly :neko: did observe people looking at dash on approach and in mirrors on passing to check a flash. None were looking ahead - and she observed this as passenger whilst being driven by our son.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
Well you have to look in your mirror to check for the double flash - otherwise you won't remember the occasion for when the NIP appears. It's compulsory, as is looking at your speedo twice on the approach and once in the target zone.

If you didn't do this then you wouldn't have anything to argue about when the reflection or whatever triggers the thing at the lower speed, and the scam operators accidentatally on purpose forget to check the photos (or the camera is set to 0.7 not 0.5 sec).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 09:59 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:18
Posts: 67
Location: Nottingham
I people braking for speed cameras a lot when they're within the speed limit- occasionally emergency braking!

They may be in the wrong for doing that but it's just another hazard these days.

Often the speed limit is very poorly marked and not obvious from the style and nature of the road. They say you should do 30 if you're not sure but what if there's no lamp posts and obscured or missing repeater signs. (Slightly off-topic) shouldn't the driver assume this is a 60 limit until passing a repeater or lamp posts if the limit is not apparent?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:51 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
From a pedestrian point of view cars can sometimes go too slow. When I am crossing the road if a car slows down too much as it approaches me I find myself walking too far out into the road as I misjudge his speed. I know it's stupid but for some reason I can't stop edgeing out until I' m in danger of clipping his wing mirror.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 23:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Witnessed today at the Gatso just east of the Sunningdale level crossing on the A30 in Surrey: driver going just slightly over 30, maybe even under it depending on speedo accuracy, and heeeeere's the Gatso... on go the brake lights, it probably doesn't have any film in it since it was pointing at a tree for months last year and they weren't fussed about fixing it, but you never know and this guy obviously wasn't prepared to take the chance. The usual Pavlovan response.



Oh, did I mention what he was driving? Wait for it ..... a Hi Top Trannie with high viz markings and Surrey Police decals all over it.

Well, it's comforting to know that Surrey don't hire stupid cops :lol: but kind of shows how almost anyone can become conditioned to brakig for the damn things.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 20:24 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
Peyote wrote:
Hmm... I can see the logic of what you're saying, but am reluctant to absolve drivers of their responsibility to other road users. I guess it's down to personal perspective. I'd argue that drivers should learn not to panic brake when they see the cameras (in fact one could go so far as to use it as an excuse to put more cameras up!). The cameras aren't the origins of the panic braking, it's the drivers response to the cameras that are is the problem. Ergo it's the drivers attitude to the cameras that needs to change.

IMHO. :wink:


Eh?
How the hell do you convince the public that they should think of others around them when the licence, livelihood etc are at risk. Especially when the one that rams you from behind (ahem!) is normally considered guilty.

The cameras are the problem, not the drivers.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 20:29 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
Quote:
It certainly would make sense to put the limit signs actually on the cameras, or at the very least in the same line of sight as the camera (when it is visible of course). If it stops panic braking then it's got to be a positive step forward.

Although I suppose it should be said that drivers should know the limit of the road they are driving down. A reminder wouldn't do any damage though! :wink:


Youre assuming the scumera operators want us to know the limits. Amatuer mistake. The same way as its illegal to warn drivers of a scumera up ahead, because they dont really want you to slow down.

Its fucked up


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 15:59 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 19:54
Posts: 7
Location: Yorkshire
I personally like to leave myself a significant margin of error when passing a speed camera. You never know what margin of leeway you will be given. ie for some cameras you will be ticketed at 35 in a 30 others it will be significantly higher.

Because of this passing a camera in a 30 limit zone at more than 30 is extremely risky (too risky for me) and staying 2-3 mph under the limit is the best course of action.

Incidentally there is a road near me going over towards Leeds which has around 10 speed cameras on a 2 mile stretch. Because of the sheer number of cameras traffic moves in fits and starts as drivers continually brake for the cameras and there is significant bunching of traffic. The road has also been recently reduced to a 30 limit too. Because of the sheer frustration of using this road due to the slow speeds and constant stop start many drivers are now diverting on to more minor residential roads which are even more dangerous. Another victory for the SCP!!

_________________
Mark


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 08:08 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 07:21
Posts: 1
[quote="samcro"]Has anyone noticed that some people slow down a lot (more than neccessary) for speed cameras?

Recently in the City of London a motorcyclist passed me at, I guess about 40mph, and for some reason verred across my path. At that moment he suddenly spotted the speed camera we were approaching and slammed on the brakes slowing to well below the obligatory 30mph. If his attrocious driving had not already caused me to hit the brakes I would most definately have run in to him. Interestingly as soon as he had passed the speed grid in the road he rapidly sped off into the distance. Cameras simply don't work because this is what the majority of drivers do - hit the brakes as they pass the camera and then take off again.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.019s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]