Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jun 05, 2026 09:07

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 22:12 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
This is Leicestershire here
This is Leicestershire wrote:
Number of bad crashes on roads falling

The number of people killed or seriously injured on the roads has fallen by 40 per cent since 1997.
Figures released yesterday showed that between 1995 and 1997 the number of people killed or seriously injured in Leicestershire and Rutland averaged 577 a year.
By 2010 that number had fallen to 351.

Chief Constable Simon Cole said: "We are pleased as this is a significant reduction but we will not be complacent.
"It does show that the partnership we have created is effective and has reaped benefits in improving road safety and bringing down the number of people killed and hurt on our roads."
He said Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Road Safety Partnership, which includes councils and the emergency services, would continue to try to bring the figures down further.
The figures also showed a drop of more than 50 per cent in the number of children killed and seriously injured, from 72 to 35.
The number of slight injuries suffered fell by more than 25 per cent, from 4,357 to 3,161.

Lesley Pendleton, Leicestershire County Council's spokeswoman for environment and transport, said: "This achievement is testament to the wide-ranging work of the partnership, including safety cameras and information and training for road users.
"However, there are still too many lives lost and families devastated through road crashes so we need to continue to help everyone to use roads safely."

Mark Wills, the city council's head of transport strategy, said: "The road safety partnership has played a key role in reducing casualties.
"Fixed and mobile speed cameras in the city have had a very positive effect."

Aman Mehra, from Rutland County Council, said: "The partnership continues to work to reduce casualties.
"Deployment of the safety camera vans continues to have a positive impact."
We must see the traffic volumes to know that the rate is the same, or the figures show as I suspect that they do that the fall is due to the drop in traffic leading (from recession) to less death and injuries.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 22:14 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Also reported by BBC News Leicestershire here
Quote:
Leicestershire and Rutland road casualty rates fall

The number of fatal and serious accidents on Leicestershire and Rutland roads has fallen by 40% over the past 10 years, new figures have revealed.

Leicestershire Police said 351 people were killed or injured in 2010 compared with 577 a decade earlier.

The force said the latest figures also showed a reduction of more than 50% in the number of children killed or seriously injured in the same period.
Rutland County Council said speed cameras had helped improve road safety.

Mobile cameras
Slight injury road casualties fell by more than 25% from 4,357 to 3,161.

Aman Mehra, of Rutland County Council, said: "The Road Safety Partnership continues to work tirelessly to reduce Rutland's road casualties.
"Deployment of the safety camera vans at sites in Rutland suffering from speed and collisions continues to have a positive road safety impact."
Simon Cole, Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police, said: "Reducing road casualties is a key aim of the force.
"The Road Safety Partnership continues to introduce excellent initiatives that have impacted greatly on the casualty rate.
"This work will continue in 2011 and beyond with a view to cutting road casualties even further."

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 23:45 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Well, it's not like the KSIs were also falling BEFORE the scamera Partnership was formed, is it?! :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 00:09 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Not if you remain in office long enough ! This Country experiences 'recession years' at the end/beginning of every decade certainly since the 70's ... (some worse than others) so it is of no 'surprise' then that we have had / ending another one, and we know that crashes, and fatalities are lower during these periods.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 09:35 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Of course, it could have something to do with cars getting safer since 1997....no,... bound to be speed cameras that have done it!

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 14:22 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
Not if you remain in office long enough ! This Country experiences 'recession years' at the end/beginning of every decade certainly since the 70's ... (some worse than others) so it is of no 'surprise' then that we have had / ending another one, and we know that crashes, and fatalities are lower during these periods.


But the article is saying that the 40% reduction is over a 10 year period so it would have encompassed both a recession and better times. Overall it's still a drop. What we need to find out is whether there was a 40% drop over the previous 10 years (when there were no scamera partnerships) and a drop of 40% for the 10 years before that. I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that was the case!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 17:16 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Accident figures have been dropping decade by decade, since the seventies but NOT as fast, (in percentage terms) in the last few decades, as the first few.

I'll see if I can find the figures for this source. Try this

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/da ... accidents/

These are the numbers of people killed per billion veh km between 1977 and 2008
1977 26.1
1978 26.1
1979 24.4
1980 21.7
1981 20.7
1982 20.4
1983 18.5
1984 18.1
1985 16.4
1986 16.3
1987 14.4
1988 13.3
1989 13.0
1990 12.5
1991 11.0
1992 10.1
1993 9.2
1994 8.6
1995 8.3
1996 8.1
1997 7.9
1998 7.4
1999 7.3
2000 7.2
2001 7.2
2002 7.0
2003 7.1
2004 6.4
2005 6.4
2006 6.2
2007 5.7
2008 4.9

These figures show that for the same time span between 1977 and 1991 the rate fell by 58%.

Makes their 40% look a bit sick doesn't it?

They're saying these figures have dropped by 40% over a ten year span but quoting 1997 to 2010 (typical SCP spin) but even if you take ten years from 1977 to 1987 the figure drops by 42%. !997 to 2007 is (on this chart) a only 28% drop, so I suspect that their "ten" year figures are actually 1997 to 2010...then again Greenshed was always crap with his maths, must be one of the qualifications for SCPs...I see no subs.... :lol:

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.015s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]