Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 06:40

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 387 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 21:55 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
adam.L wrote:
Green shed, I have a few questions.


Can I give you my answers?

adam.L wrote:
What do you consider to be an acceptable number of KSI's?


Zero is what we should be striving for on the public roads.

adam.L wrote:
Why do you consider a person who is capable of judging his or her own safe speed to be arrogant?


If they think any speed at all is a "safe speed" then they've lost the argument already IMO.

adam.L wrote:
How do you think the way road safety is researched, implemented and enforced compares with aviation safety methods?


No, and many drivers are "lucky" in that respect.

If drivers were put under the same scrutiny as pilots and suffered the same penalties (and training regime) they're be a lot less of em on the road.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 06:35 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
weepej wrote:
adam.L wrote:
Green shed, I have a few questions.


Can I give you my answers?

adam.L wrote:
What do you consider to be an acceptable number of KSI's?


Zero is what we should be striving for on the public roads..


That is easy to achieve. Do not allow motor vehicles on the public roads. Of course that would lead to lots of other deaths caused by people not being able to get to hospitals quickly, fire engines not been able to get to fires and so on. The question is to find point where the number of KSIs is worth the benefits gained by having vehicles on the road.

And, as I have already said that decision is not the remit of an highway engineer

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 08:12 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
And, as I have already said that decision is not the remit of an highway engineer


I have to agree with you 100% on that one DCB, IMO the best qualified for such jobs are the police.

Their highly trained and experienced drivers should, with the aid of mean speed surveys, be able to determine what a safe limit for any stretch of road is by driving it, accident rates (taking into account types of accident) and mean speeds.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
Quote:
And, as I have already said that decision is not the remit of an highway engineer

Absolutley, but who (ie which group) would you have making that decision?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 13:42 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Odin wrote:
Quote:
And, as I have already said that decision is not the remit of an highway engineer

Absolutley, but who (ie which group) would you have making that decision?


Democratically elected politicians. Damn that shoots my argument down :D

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 15:07 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
weepej wrote:
If they think any speed at all is a "safe speed" then they've lost the argument already IMO.


Interesting.

Do you move as part of your daily routine?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 16:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
dcbwhaley wrote:
Odin wrote:
Quote:
And, as I have already said that decision is not the remit of an highway engineer

Absolutley, but who (ie which group) would you have making that decision?


Democratically elected politicians. Damn that shoots my argument down :D

:clap1:
Almost an oxymoron I suggest


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 20:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Johnnytheboy wrote:
weepej wrote:
If they think any speed at all is a "safe speed" then they've lost the argument already IMO.


Interesting.

Do you move as part of your daily routine?


Yes, I regulary drive a car, but I wouldn't be so arrogant to suggest any speed faster than 0mph is a safe speed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 21:40 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
I didn't mention cars, did I?

Why would that suggestion be arrogant? Oh yes, it involves cars.

Can any human activity be described as 100% safe? If not (surely you're not making a special case for motorised transport) then by that logic it's arrogant for anyone, anywhere to describe anything as safe.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 22:15 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Is 0 MPH that safe? I know lots of people that died in their sleep...my grandad got shot in the war just standing still....what is safe?

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 00:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 02:25
Posts: 331
weepej wrote:
Yes, I regulary drive a car, but I wouldn't be so arrogant to suggest any speed faster than 0mph is a safe speed.


Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving

:bunker:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 06:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Johnnytheboy wrote:
I didn't mention cars, did I?

Why would that suggestion be arrogant? Oh yes, it involves cars.



Same for push bikes, or motorcycles, or running.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 08:11 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Ooh I know.. got the answer :hehe:


let's turn all human life into stone statues. There.. that should do it. No one moves then!



JohhnytheBoy wrote:
weepej wrote:
If they think any speed at all is a "safe speed" then they've lost the argument already IMO.



Interesting.

Do you move as part of your daily routine?


I'd rephrase that. :hehe: As a medic - it's one of the funny questions I sometimes ask :lol:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 08:15 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
NOT THAT KIND OF MOVEMENT!!!

:o


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 15:36 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
weepej wrote:
Johnnytheboy wrote:
weepej wrote:
If they think any speed at all is a "safe speed" then they've lost the argument already IMO.


Interesting.

Do you move as part of your daily routine?


Yes, I regulary drive a car, but I wouldn't be so arrogant to suggest any speed faster than 0mph is a safe speed.

So is a knife in the wrong hands; as is alcohol, fire-matches and of course driving.

When used properly and responsibly there is not a problem with any of them. You wouldn’t blame the knife for being in someone's back but the person who put it there, so why is it different with speeding? Why blame the speed for killing someone instead of the idiot who used it irresponsibly?

I would rather have a much heavier penalty for drivers going too fast where it is unsafe, (like driving without due care and attention or dangerous driving), instead of penalising a driver who is over an 'ignorant' posted limit where it is safe to do so. It sends a much clearer message – Drive Safely or else!

I would rather a driver do 100+ mph on a clear open stretch of DC than overtake me at 30mph an inch from my handlebars, as indeed someone did when I was cycling to work just this morning Image. One is relatively safe the other most definitely is not! If I was a traff pol I may let the first instance go with a warning but I would prosecute the later.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 18:03 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Last paragraph reminds me of 'Johnny's 19th Law' which is that if I am stuck behind a slower car and we catch up a cyclist, they will invariably pass the cyclist much closer than I will.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 18:55 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
weepej wrote:
If they think any speed at all is a "safe speed" then they've lost the argument already IMO.


I can only assume that you won't be risking your life on that new fast train that has been all over the news. I mean, 140 clicks, someone is going to get hurt...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 19:48 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Oh indeed, those arrogant train operating companies!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 19:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Oh indeed, those arrogant train operating companies!


Sigh.

Train tracks are off limts to people, roads are not (except perhaps motorways).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 20:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Mad Moggie wrote:
Ooh I know.. got the answer :hehe:


let's turn all human life into stone statues. There.. that should do it. No one moves then!



How utterly ridculous.

I'm not asking for that, just that when people do move their cars (and motorbikes and cycles and shoes) they take the necessary care to mitigate danger inherent, particulary when moving a one ton vehicle around.

I simply don't think enough people do this.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 387 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.037s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]