Quite a few people seem to have mentioned the thing about LSDs. I think we ought to keep this in perspective! They are just that - "limited" slip, as opposed to "no" slip! If the difference in rolling circumference was something like a tractor wheel on one side and a skateboard wheel on the other, I might be able to see the point, but were not talking THAT much difference with space savers!
I completely agree on the wheel changing thing though - we're rapidly becoming a nation of useless "victims"! A generation ago, many (most?) motorists would have not only carried a jack and spare, but also tyre lever and a puncture repair kit! I realise that modern tyres (being wider, tubeless and low profile) can't be repaired like this but I think it shows just how self-reliant people used to be compared to how helpless they are now!
The debate about having the spare wheel in a well so that you have to empty the boot to get to it VS having it in a carrier under the car where it gets filthy and might get nicked, has existed for many years. I'm not sure I'd know which way to "vote" if I got the choice to be honest! A couple of years ago, I had (can't really call it a "blow-out", more of a "rapid deflation" - within a few hundred yards) on the motorway at night. Murphy's law being what it is, that mean it was an offside rear tyre

and I have to admit, it wasn't nice changing it with trucks flyng past. I was grateful that it was in a cage under the car on that occasion as it took a lot less time to change. It would have taken even less if the car had been fitted with good, old-fashioned wheel studs and nuts rather than the more modern "wheel bolts"! Does anyone know why they do that? It's MUCH quicker working in the dark with the former setup!
Of course, in my time, I've had FOUR cars whose (full-sized!) spare has been under the bonnet!