Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Nov 14, 2026 22:32

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 00:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 21:51
Posts: 293
No Smeggy, this is no trick question - vehicle was very old in fact, 15 years old and looks it. I was caught "bang to rights" so to speak and my excuse was that I was testing my bearings around a roundabout.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 01:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
OK, but I suspect you might have to be yet more specific. The V112 form gives numerous MOT exemptions for vehicles (including old cars) for various reasons.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 15:10 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 21:51
Posts: 293
OMG, what is it with you people?

This was what I hoped was an interesting piece of banter. The car didn't have an MOT and should have - no tricks. I told police I was testing the bearings and I'm not a MOT Tester, and never claimed it was on-route for an MOT - what happened next?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 15:12 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
:yawn:

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 16:17 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Lucy W wrote:
[The car didn't have an MOT] and should have

That part wasn't clearly expressed earlier; like I said, more specifics were needed.

Lucy W wrote:
what is it with you people?

As silly as my response may be, it is not representative of what others might think.
I believe I had addressed you 'key matter' properly and with sincerity; do you think your response could have been worded in a less confrontational manner?

[edited for clarity at 15:53, but was done before you last visited, at 14:54:02 ]


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 19:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 21:51
Posts: 293
I'm bored so I'tell you.
Had NIP, then advise that the prosecution was no-longer proceeding.

My understanding is that I could have been prosecuted Re: the other comments made and would of had no defence, but the CPS adopted a common sense view in this case. Just wondered if in fact I did have a lawful defence that I'm not aware of, but none of the legal eagles chipped in on this one, so we will never know.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.009s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]