Stephen wrote:
You shouldnt always trust what you read in the papers,the true story is better reading.
Most of the so,called injured parties in this so called collision couldnt sleep straight in bed at night if there life depended on it.
You would have to be there to see just how much people will exaggerate or lie to put it more strongly as there version of events doesn't fit the actual evidence at the scene,I rest my case.
Stephen
The Mad Doc's sisters reckon the area is quite "rough". I was based in Mancheter years ago.. and seem to recall some problem areas. I think it housed some "challenging families" even back then.
I do not know how big the humps .. but I know Transits do not get along that well with them at any speed.
I do wonder about road position of the on-coming car.. width of this road and height of the humps though.

No doubt all will pan out fine when the investigation is completed.
You know we always take the officer from driving duties if there is an incident. This does not mean the officer is at any fault.. but we know any incident will shake confidence. We also need to investigate properly so as to learn from any errors and train to counter similar problems.
It's what everyone should do.. no matter how small the error. Evaluate each drive .. learn from it... and try to correct it to best ability.
My advice to the officer is to try not to worry, to stay calm and professional when being debriefed and writing up his reports on the incident. Be prepared to learn from the incident and put behind and chalk to experience when panic over.
That said.. surely the other bloke saw the lights.. heard a siren.. saw a great big van
Ah well.
. fate.. co- inidences or series of silly errors never do add up to "right" :roll;