Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jul 28, 2026 20:47

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 17:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 00:30
Posts: 71
On another note,

I'm getting £5 more for my bike than I paid for it - although it has had a couple of hundred quid's worth of servicing and repairs done since then. So hopefully I'll take the cheque for £1200, sell it for £1200 and then buy a shiny FZ6. Not half bad. :D

Riding a Bandit is a bit like riding a much more powerful CG125 btw...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 17:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 16:37
Posts: 265
repiV wrote:
. So hopefully I'll take the cheque for £1200, sell it for £1200 and then buy a shiny FZ6.


Once you take the cheque, the bike belongs to the insurance co. and isn't yours to sell


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 17:33 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 00:30
Posts: 71
patdavies wrote:
Once you take the cheque, the bike belongs to the insurance co. and isn't yours to sell


Indeed, but I can buy the salvage from them for a small fee.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 17:33 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 13:06
Posts: 116
mpaton2004 wrote:
lol, not bad for someone who claims they're a great rider after 2 months :P


Nice, thats really constructive.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 17:37 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 00:30
Posts: 71
balrog wrote:
Nice, thats really constructive.


I just realised, he has the same first initial and surname as this really annoying English teacher from my college days that was universally despised by staff and students alike.
It's all starting to come clear now...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 18:58 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 13:06
Posts: 116
repiV wrote:
balrog wrote:
Nice, thats really constructive.


I just realised, he has the same first initial and surname as this really annoying English teacher from my college days that was universally despised by staff and students alike.
It's all starting to come clear now...


:D :D :D
Its a conspiracy then!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 19:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
repiV wrote:
patdavies wrote:
Once you take the cheque, the bike belongs to the insurance co. and isn't yours to sell


Indeed, but I can buy the salvage from them for a small fee.


If it's a write-off, they usually scrap it, not sell the remains. Too many people moaning to them about how bikes wouldn't be nicked if they didn't sell the reg docs to the crooks.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 21:27 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 21:11
Posts: 1
SafeSpeed wrote:
repiV wrote:
Yesterday I was coming back from work, down the A41 in London. As I never like to ride next to or in the blind spot of large vehicles, I nailed it past this lorry that was in the lane to my left and then noticed I was on top of a scamera. I was going at about 63mph, I thought the speed limit was 40 (it was actually 50) so naturally grabbed the brakes. Slowed down in time, only for the car behind to swerve past me and narrowly miss my right foot. Which surprised me actually because I'd really nailed it away from the lights and I hadn't expected the following traffic to catch up that quickly.
Moral of the story: speed cameras suck, and in this instance they tried to punish me for performing a safe and sensible maneuvre..


I'm sorry that some others seem to be giving you a hard time. As it happens I don't agree with their judgements. It's frequently safe and sensible to 'nail it' to clear a danger zone.

I'm sure you're probably aware, Paul, but mpaton2004 and probably also "ElAndGone" are cyclingplus trolls.

They spend ages searching for threads on here of this sort, then boast about their trolling as such:
http://cyclingplus.co.uk/forum/topic.as ... _ID=133731


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 23:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
On the plus side, Paul should feel honoured, I have just read some of the threads over on cycling plus. All of the threads in the Campaign section, which purports to be about 'serious cycling issues' are in all fact about SafeSpeed and Paul Smith. So clearly they aknowledge the good work being done here :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 00:32 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
repiV wrote:
I never once claimed I was a great rider.
And how exactly was I supposed to foresee a physics quirk that I didn't even know existed happening under normal riding conditions?
So...What have you learned from this experience?

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 09:31 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
a link for repiv here

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 09:51 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
handy wrote:
a link for repiv here


Handy that really isn't constructive, and quite frankly as a fellow biker very offensive.

We've had people join here who've had such bad attitudes towards their own personal safety (either that or very small genitals and felt the need to boast about it) that its been laughable. I remember one guy who said that if you didn't fear for your life at some point then it wasn't a good ride.

repiV might well be SLIGHTLY full of it, but I think we all were a month after a test pass. Personally I think there MIGHT be more to the tank slapper he suffered than just rider error - powering on in a corner in the wet might well cause the back end to step out but not to fishtail like he describes, and the initial step out under hard acceleration like that is usually violent enough to send the unaware rider down. It might well have been rider error, but it also might well be mechanical fault - I wouldn't put it past a hire company to have mixed radials and crossplys for instance, or have badly adjusted / messed with / damaged suspension.

The most important thing is that he's here and he's discussing what happened with more experienced riders. I'm still learning and I've been on the road 4 years. Give the guy a brake FFS - he's been riding for a month in London and he's still here, that's gotta be worth SOMETHING.

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 13:15
Posts: 135
therealbonj wrote:
I'm sure you're probably aware, Paul, but mpaton2004 and probably also "ElAndGone" are cyclingplus trolls.

They spend ages searching for threads on here of this sort, then boast about their trolling as such:
http://cyclingplus.co.uk/forum/topic.as ... _ID=133731


Are you all so paranoid as to think that everyone with a different opinion just HAS to be a C+ troll?...
Well FWIW, (dunno about the other guy) in my case...I never knew the C+ forum existed until you mentioned it on your paranoia trip.
Comparing the two camps I must say that many of the exchanges so far seem rather childish and do nothing to further either camps' ideology(IMHO of course).

Anyway I'm Waaaayyy too overweight to sling my lard ass over a crossbar these days...probably put my back out in the attempt as well...no I'll drive my car and obey the limits and drive at whatever speed UPTO those limits as I feel and SEE is safe to travel at.
Like anyone else here or elsewhere I reserve the right to put my own viewpoint across in the spirit of debate without being labelled or otherwise censored because I don't always agree with consensus in force at the time.
That doesn’t make me a troll…it makes me an INDIVIDUAL. . ...I’m not advocating you accept or even like my views but I have always been of the opinion that a debate is better and more meaningful when there are different views on a subject...
If I seem not to agree with your take on things…Get over it…move on….I do and now I have responded to the ‘troll’ slur…I shall.
:)


Last edited by ElandGone on Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:15, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:06 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
mpaton ain't a troll either. He's been a member for AGES and I think he started off agreeing with the SS thinking. He then had a moment of 'clarity' and now his opinions have changed.

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 13:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
repiV wrote:
I'd just left my house lastnight, pulled right onto the main road and accelerated (fairly briskly, but nowhere near as fast as I could have done) and presumably because of the wet, it set off an unrecoverable gyroscopic effect where the rear end was swerving violently from left to right.


Sounds to me like repiV hit a bit of oil/deisel/white line/manhole cover on cold tyres and rather than backing off just kept the throttle on or the swerving was causing the throttle to be jerked on and off thus causing the pendulum effect.

Loss of grip on the rear in wet or damp conditions is invariably attributed to too much throttle and not enough grip. Times to be aware of the lack of grip on road surfaces are when icy, when gritted, when wet and especially when wet after a long dry spell as the oils in the road leech out and sit on the water causing a skid pan.

Glad to hear that you are ok repiV but I think you know you were lucky. I suggest that you now think about when and where you give it the beans to ensure you continue to enjoy your rides.

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 13:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 13:15
Posts: 135
Sixy_the_red wrote:
mpaton ain't a troll either. He's been a member for AGES and I think he started off agreeing with the SS thinking. He then had a moment of 'clarity' and now his opinions have changed.


I don't dis-agree with the SS ideology either (for the most part anyway :wink: ) what I do dis agree with is certain cavalier attitudes towards road safety and others perception of what is, or is not safe.
In my view the OP's actions (as recounted) were not safe...but that doesn't make me right or wrong...what the OP has to do is take all the commentary offered so far and take from it as much or as little as he will ....

FWIW... I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment that
Quote:
The most important thing is that he's here and he's discussing what happened with more experienced riders

:wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 13:16 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
Sixy_the_red wrote:
handy wrote:
a link for repiv here


Handy that really isn't constructive, and quite frankly as a fellow biker very offensive.

I agree. Personally, I think that is quite appalling. :x

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 19:00 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 23:56
Posts: 252
Location: Manchester
repiV wrote:
mpaton2004 wrote:
lol, not bad for someone who claims they're a great rider after 2 months :P


I never once claimed I was a great rider.
And how exactly was I supposed to foresee a physics quirk that I didn't even know existed happening under normal riding conditions?

So STFU.


Possibly because wet roads are usually greasy roads.

Your accident was entirely preventable, but really you just need more experience.

I suggest you buy a less powerful bike. Walk before you run.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 18:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 00:30
Posts: 71
jomukuk wrote:
If it's a write-off, they usually scrap it, not sell the remains. Too many people moaning to them about how bikes wouldn't be nicked if they didn't sell the reg docs to the crooks.


It seems a bit dumb to crush a bike that would be in a decent condition if you spent a few hundred quid on it...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 18:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 00:30
Posts: 71
MrsMiggins wrote:
So...What have you learned from this experience?


I'm not sure I can really answer that question when I still don't understand why it happened.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 252 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.050s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]