Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun May 31, 2026 16:01

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 15:09 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Someone called "Howard" mounted a libellous attack on Safe Speed / me.

I decided to defend myself. Have a look at:
http://www.cyclingplus.co.uk/forum/topi ... C_ID=49253

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 15:28 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
is that the Howard that goes on T2000's site? It's not as though people that ride bike are beyond critism. Riding on pavements, no lights, etc. They were complaing that some roads the traffic travels too fast. Som e roads are too fast for my low performance motorcycle, so I avoid them. Easy.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 16:11 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
I have "met" the guy before, he is a tit. On any sane forum he would be banned as a Troll, his posts are always worded to incite an extreme reaction.

When actually pressed to back up his supposed facts he quietly changes the subject.

For example...
Quote:
Originally posted by SafeSpeed
Quote:
Originally posted by Howard
We have the safest roads in the world

Not for vulnerable road users we don't. In fact for cyclists and children the UK has the second most dangerous roads in Europe, second only to Portugal...


I've got different figures somewhere. Quote your source.

You never did get an answer to that, he (she/it?) just carried on with more spurious allegations designed to bring his fans on-side. I'm pretty certain I pressed him on the same question and got the same response.

I like the way he uses the words "very recently" then quotes something from over a year ago!

I did invite him to bring himself over here to join the debate but he declined the offer.

As for Cycling Plus I gave up on that place a long time ago, just the same old faces having the same old discussion, going round and round in circles. Most of the people there are actually quite sane, they are the quiet ones. Anyone who dares to offer a balanced view is labelled a child killing speed freek.


Last edited by Homer on Sun Dec 19, 2004 16:23, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 16:21 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Homer wrote:
I like the way he uses the words "very recently" then quotes something from over a year ago!


Over 3 years ago actually. The date format is year first. Why? Japanese software? Something deliberate?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 16:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
SafeSpeed wrote:
Homer wrote:
I like the way he uses the words "very recently" then quotes something from over a year ago!


Over 3 years ago actually. The date format is year first. Why? Japanese software? Something deliberate?


Hmmmm... now where's my login details....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 17:15 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Although these bun-fights are often amusing to read, they merely demostrate one thing: People will believe what they want to believe; particularly true of the more trenchant campaigners and vocal observers.
You're a tit, he's an idiot, they're mad etc etc. Does anyone read the 'evidence' presented by the other side for purposes other than to find a way to debunk it (as opposed to comprehend it and accept it?) I seriously doubt it.
Its entertaining though :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 17:41 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 17:36
Posts: 40
Much as it grieves me to say it, the only foreseeable victor in a bun fight between drivers and cyclists will be cyclists, their buns being much firmer and tighter than ours.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 17:43 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
:lol:

Howard had better not come to my patch either.... we have been busy... :lol: Second thoughts ... would take delight in treating him to our most acid of roadside lectures! :lol:

Looking through the diaries this week .. copped 5 cyclists pedalling without lights, one ignoring a red light signal, and another caused a driver to swerve into a hedge. Breathalyser proved the driver was sober and the cyclist was one and half times above the legal limit and had been on his mobile phone at the time :roll:

Such fun ... they get even stroppier than drivers .... :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 17:59 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
suck_my_tailpipe wrote:
Much as it grieves me to say it, the only foreseeable victor in a bun fight between drivers and cyclists will be cyclists, their buns being much firmer and tighter than ours.

But if we had a gut-barging contest...

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 18:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 00:08
Posts: 748
Location: Grimsby
I saw one yesterday morning cycling along the footpath opposite my house, not just on the footpath, but swigging from a can of lager at the same time, :shock: :evil: :evil:

_________________
Semper in excreta, nur quantitat variat.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 19:18 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
PeterE wrote:
suck_my_tailpipe wrote:
Much as it grieves me to say it, the only foreseeable victor in a bun fight between drivers and cyclists will be cyclists, their buns being much firmer and tighter than ours.

But if we had a gut-barging contest...


Blimey. Speak for yourselves, you two. :D

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 19:25 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Using the phrase "The Jehovah’s witnesses of speed"

could be construed as inciting religious hatred.... :shock:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 19:27 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
PeterE wrote:
suck_my_tailpipe wrote:
Much as it grieves me to say it, the only foreseeable victor in a bun fight between drivers and cyclists will be cyclists, their buns being much firmer and tighter than ours.

But if we had a gut-barging contest...

Blimey. Speak for yourselves, you two. :D

Get a few mince pies inside you, mate :D

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 23:13 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 00:08
Posts: 748
Location: Grimsby
I had a look at the cycling thread, the situation to me appears that Paul and Howard have diametrically opposing views on the subject.
The difference between the two, is howard appears to have a God given veiw of things and will not stray from his views, be they right or wrong, whether or not he knows it.
Whereas Paul, forgetting about his knowledge and experience, is prepared to listen, present his case WITH evidence and reason, and if the situation arises, will change his mind about something if it is for the greater good of ALL road users.
I noticed another thread extolling the virtues of how to cycle faster, I have ridden bikes, and raced them, but I always remembered that bike brakes are nowhere near as efficient or effective as a motor vehicle brake.
So who ARE the speedophiles then?

_________________
Semper in excreta, nur quantitat variat.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 23:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
Dratsabasti wrote:
I noticed another thread extolling the virtues of how to cycle faster, I have ridden bikes, and raced them, but I always remembered that bike brakes are nowhere near as efficient or effective as a motor vehicle brake.
So who ARE the speedophiles then?


Maybe you should go over there and point that out?! Then again....

However, you make a good point in that there are true cyclists (inc. the speed freaks - Lance Armstrong has made aliving from it after all), true safety conscious individuals, and then there are the social engineers who latch on to whatever cause going (Howard of the cycling fraternity and Basingwerk being cases in point).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 23:51 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I will give you three guesses as to who "Nice Tame Cat" is.... she is my sister-in-law and not sure if she is slightly zanier than my wife :lol: :lol: :lol:

She's all set to give Howard a run for his money ......my money is on the Nice Tame Cat ...... :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 20:20 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I had a look see .... wonder how long Krissi will last before they ban her ... :lol:

See Peter is also getting stuck in there too :lol:


Krissi (would not exactly use "tame" as adjective to describe her :roll: ) made a post responding to the chap who allegedly responded to MMC's Indy article some Jolly chap ... she thinks he is none other than our Fanny W*nker apparently. (We briefed her as to what to expect.... Howard has gone a bit quiet.... and fumble is thanking her for a recipe for a Swiss roll :lol: :lol: )

She even got the conversation onto orgasms at one point .... :lol:

She is my cousin ... am not responsible for her! :lol: Possibly a little wilder than Wildy even.....

From what I can gather ....the only thing they have hit back at her with is:

"Cars are crappy Throw rocks at them." This appears to be a chant over there .......

Am almost tempted to wade in there myself now :lol: Full weight of the Law! :wink:

Bit of a weird place to visit. Krissi is having fun apparently... :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 20:23 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
In Gear wrote:
Krissi (would not exactly use "tame" as adjective to describe her :roll: ) made a post responding to the chap who allegedly responded to MMC's Indy article some Jolly chap ... she thinks he is none other than our Fanny W*nker apparently. (We briefed her as to what to expect.... Howard has gone a bit quiet.... and fumble is thanking her for a recipe for a Swiss roll :lol: :lol: )

I think Bimblywimblyfimbly (the one with the anger management problem and Tourette's syndrome) is probably our friend Fanny.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 20:48 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Dratsabasti wrote:
howard appears to have a God given veiw of things and will not stray from his views, be they right or wrong, whether or not he knows it.


His obsession with Paul is a bit disturbing. Must have really got him rattled.
I can't figure out his motivation.

Sounds like that other barking mad cycling muppet refered to on this site a few weeks ago.

Another control freak with a major issues with anyone who "dares" to hold opposing views.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 00:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 00:08
Posts: 748
Location: Grimsby
Gizmo wrote:
Dratsabasti wrote:
howard appears to have a God given veiw of things and will not stray from his views, be they right or wrong, whether or not he knows it.


His obsession with Paul is a bit disturbing. Must have really got him rattled.
I can't figure out his motivation.

Sounds like that other barking mad cycling muppet refered to on this site a few weeks ago.

Another control freak with a major issues with anyone who "dares" to hold opposing views.


These are just the people who worry me, not only are they blinkered and think they are Gods own representative on this earth, but they are just the people that polli's listen to when they want new ideas.
Bit like having someone on the parliamentry transport committee who doesn't even have a driving licence.

_________________
Semper in excreta, nur quantitat variat.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.029s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]