Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Apr 24, 2026 23:29

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 14:05 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
The headline is a bit misleading........

Sky News wrote:
Banned Hours After L-Test
Updated: 11:28, Tuesday February 27, 2007


A teenager who went out to celebrate passing his L-test is believed to have become the fastest to be caught drink driving.

He was fined £150 by Guisborough magistrates, in Cleveland, ordered to pay £45 costs and banned from driving for 12 months at the hearing on Friday.

Allan Graham passed his test the previous Saturday, February 17, and went out with friends to celebrate until 1am on Sunday.

At 5.30am a female friend called him while he was in bed, asking for a lift home.

Graham, 19, who lives in Redcar, Cleveland, drove to the Kirkleatham area, where he was spotted by a traffic officer who noticed his lights were not on.

The officer pulled him over and breathtested him. The 19-year-old gave a reading of 64mg of alcohol per 100ml of breath - almost double the limit of 35mg.

He was charged with drink-driving and pleaded guilty at court five days later.

Inspector Eric Robinson of Cleveland Police said: "This incredible case is possibly the shortest length of time that anyone has ever held a driving licence and is a sobering thought for other young drivers who think they will be all right to drive after a night out.

"This incident shows we constantly look out for any driver we suspect is under the influence of drink or drugs."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 16:15 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: No sympathy for him! Throw the book, bookcase and the library at people like this. :stop: :judge:

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 17:39 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 23:56
Posts: 252
Location: Manchester
Utter clown. Still, it won't be long before hes driving an illegal car with false plates.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 21:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
and he'll have to retake his test.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 21:50 
Offline
Magistrate
Magistrate

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:58
Posts: 1155
jomukuk wrote:
and he'll have to retake his test.
I doubt it.

The new driver rules kick in at 6 points. If the report is correct he was disqualified, so no points.



The court could have ordered a retest but if the report is correct did not do so.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 22:49 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
fisherman wrote:
jomukuk wrote:
and he'll have to retake his test.
I doubt it.

The new driver rules kick in at 6 points. If the report is correct he was disqualified, so no points.



The court could have ordered a retest but if the report is correct did not do so.


Then very much where we are going wrong then. Germans and Swiss .. and I think now the French per something we read in "Le Figaro"'s Motoring section a couple of months back.(may be on "discussion agenda ...but we read something suggesting this) . require not only a re-test but some psychometric test and some counselling to correct the "attitude" before granting a licence again to newly qualifieds. They do offer something similar to others banned for drink ... but without the session with a pyschologist/counsellor type . :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 22:55 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
However, not condoning the kid.. but how many of you know if your system has excreted the booze properly.

After a hard evening in the pub.. leaving and going to bed before midnight and NOT eating anything apart from peanuts and crisps perhaps.. a good many could still be way over the drink limit the following lunch time.

Random tests in the morning.. especially in the Christmas target period .. lead to many a ban per the names and shames in the local press.

And for the record.. a forensic test on a hair strand and follicle from your head can tell us how much booze you drank six months ago these days .. such is the advances in forensics.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 00:37 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
fisherman wrote:
jomukuk wrote:
and he'll have to retake his test.
I doubt it.

The new driver rules kick in at 6 points. If the report is correct he was disqualified, so no points.



The court could have ordered a retest but if the report is correct did not do so.


Being in charge of a motor vehicle with excess alcohol (DR40)
Penalty - Fine - up to Level 4 (£2,500) and/or up to 3 months imprisonment
10 penalty points on your licence

Disqualification is at the discretion of the Court


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 01:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Mad Moggie wrote:

And for the record.. a forensic test on a hair strand and follicle from your head can tell us how much booze you drank six months ago these days .. such is the advances in forensics.



Much relief for theose of us that are going thin and follicle chalenged--soon they won't get ny evidence from us.Must remember to remove all hair - from any part of the body ,left.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 09:42 
Offline
Magistrate
Magistrate

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:58
Posts: 1155
Mad Moggie wrote:
Then very much where we are going wrong then. Germans and Swiss .. and I think now the French per something we read in "Le Figaro"'s Motoring section a couple of months back.(may be on "discussion agenda ...but we read something suggesting this) . require not only a re-test but some psychometric test and some counselling to correct the "attitude" before granting a licence again to newly qualifieds. They do offer something similar to others banned for drink ... but without the session with a pyschologist/counsellor type . :wink:

Courts have the power to order a retest for any endorseable offence. This would normally only be done where there is serious concern about driving ability. In this case its more about a lack of common sense than lack of ability.

There is a further dimension to this case in that he is a VERY inexperienced driver and if no retest is required will be able to just start driving again after his ban. Which would give a court grounds to order a retest.

I would hope that the court offered the drink drive rehabilitation course to this young man. If they did, and if he passes it, he will get a 25% reduction in his ban and will have gained a significant insight into alcohol usage and the dangers of driving too soon after drinking.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 09:45 
Offline
Magistrate
Magistrate

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:58
Posts: 1155
jomukuk wrote:
Being in charge of a motor vehicle with excess alcohol (DR40)
Penalty - Fine - up to Level 4 (£2,500) and/or up to 3 months imprisonment
10 penalty points on your licence

Disqualification is at the discretion of the Court
IF the report is correct he was convicted of drink driving not drunk in charge.

Drink driving has a compulsory ban with a minimum period of 12 months.

Neither of those offences has a compulsory retest.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
As fisherman says, I don't know why they would opt for DR40 when DR10 is clearly appropriate, so it would seem that this is what he got.

Presumably DR40 with 10 points, while not automatically requiring a retest, would have this effect for a new driver, since he would have in excess of 6 points.

Parrot of Doom wrote:
Still, it won't be long before hes driving an illegal car with false plates.


Indeed! Even without the requirement for a retest keeping him off the roads he is likely to find the cost of getting back on the roads (legally) to be prohibitive now.

Whilst the 'rehabilitation' course does confer the benefit of reduced premiums (from what they would be for a convicted drink-driver), the participating companies are ones that would be at the higher end of the premium scale for young drivers anyway.

Mad Moggie wrote:
After a hard evening in the pub.. leaving and going to bed before midnight and NOT eating anything apart from peanuts and crisps perhaps.. a good many could still be way over the drink limit the following lunch time.


Would drinking on an empty stomach not mean that the alcohol was absorbed more quickly than if the stomach was full, and therefore would not be metabolised any slower?

The fact of the matter is that the government ads tell us not to try to calculate the limit, 'because we can't', but it is entirely possible that you could still be over in the morning, as evidenced in many cases. So where does this leave the driver in terms of knowing if they're safe to drive?

It doesn't make sense to me that we wait until drivers have been convicted of drink driving to educate them about it. I feel that it should be part of the syllabus discussed by the instructor, and should feature far more heavily in the theory test too. Perhaps a whole additional section of the theory test on 'Human Factors', encompassing drink, drugs, fatigue, cognative failure etc.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 21:27 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
fisherman wrote:
Mad Moggie wrote:
Then very much where we are going wrong then. Germans and Swiss .. and I think now the French per something we read in "Le Figaro"'s Motoring section a couple of months back.(may be on "discussion agenda ...but we read something suggesting this) . require not only a re-test but some psychometric test and some counselling to correct the "attitude" before granting a licence again to newly qualifieds. They do offer something similar to others banned for drink ... but without the session with a pyschologist/counsellor type . :wink:

Courts have the power to order a retest for any endorseable offence. This would normally only be done where there is serious concern about driving ability. In this case its more about a lack of common sense than lack of ability.

There is a further dimension to this case in that he is a VERY inexperienced driver and if no retest is required will be able to just start driving again after his ban. Which would give a court grounds to order a retest.

I would hope that the court offered the drink drive rehabilitation course to this young man. If they did, and if he passes it, he will get a 25% reduction in his ban and will have gained a significant insight into alcohol usage and the dangers of driving too soon after drinking.


So do I hope that he was offered some kind of course at this stage in in his life. Losing the licence in the way he did .. may have had a very sobering shock effect on him.. but I also think he will benefit very much if offered this course as well. May even be able to influence his close peers and pals as well.

We have a young man in our foster care. He's now post 16th birthday.. but opted to pursue some post GCSE studies and a couple of GCSE re-sits. Been with us for almost a year now. He came to us for a couple of reasons.. one being that he had just been released from a young offenders for TWOCcing cars .. under-age drinking.. a dalliance with ecstasy.. and his mother apparently was unable to control him. (Not a single mum.. but a widow in her 30s with younger children. Kid got in with a "bad" set. He has a potentially good decent life ahead of him .. but all kids need firmish guidance. )

On his arrival .. he raided my drinks cabinet. Got almost uncontrollably drunk and .. let's just say.. drunken tantrum and teenage hormones are not for the weak minded. He was actually quite violent.. chucking things around, swearing .. and he took a swing at me and missed ...and then threw up all the consumed booze over me and thankfully passed out at that point. I let him sleep it off. Blamed and cursed myself for not locking the drinks cabinet even though I was aware of the history.. though Wildy says he would have picked the lock anyway.. as this is an antique piece and not exactly hard to unlock without the key. :roll:

I have spent the past year .. educating him away from drink and "leisure drugs". Observing him now.. I would say a genuine example of the effect of peer pressures and the British misconception as to "what constitutes a good time" are a serious part of the drink to get drunk culture.

He knows that booze in moderation is OK .. as part of a meal "at table". That getting drunk is not really "pleasure and leisure"... and whilst I refer to my twins in jest as the "terrible twosome" :lol: :wink: - they have been extremely supportive in introducing this young man to their pals.. taking him out with them.. supporting him..

I think we are now on a course towards responsibility. He did not receive any "ban or points on a ghost licence" during his past misdemeanours. He turns 17 soon. I think I owe society and this kid proper driving tuition at our expense as a child (ward of court) in our care. His mother is a regular visitor to us .. so he also has his mother's love and support and a now a better relationship with her.. but only after a lot of hard work from all of us to achieve this.

I have to say.. fostering is very rewarding.. gives a real feel good factor for the fosterer and the fostered child .. but you have to work very hard with these children, the authorities and their parents as well.


Why I do it? I simply like people and want to help them and their children as best I can. I know my wife thinks the same. It was a fully joint decision to do this.. and I would actively encourage only those who genuinely love people and children to sign up for what is a hard work ... but very very rewarding hard work.. as the love and respect these kids and their parents have for you.. is very similar to that of your own kids.. and it lasts a lifetime.

But back to the topic.. we are not doing enough to help or educate these kids. I do not doubt the kid in this case is basically a decent lad. Sadly he was not aware of biology or the effect of drink on his young system. We really do need to address this problem and seek to educate to prevent rather than saddle with criminal record and unaffordable insurance premiums for 11 years. .. lesding perhaps to other crimes. :roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 21:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Mad Moggie wrote:
...unaffordable insurance premiums for 11 years...


Perhaps a point of pedantry, but most insurance companies now only ask about offences in the last 5 years, and as such take a rather more sensible view than the DVLA/legal system with regard to rehabilitation of drink drive offenders. By this I mean that drink driving carries the same reabilitation period as a jail term of up to 2.5 years! Assault and battery offenders will have their conviction 'spent' after 7 years!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 21:47 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
RobinXe wrote:
Mad Moggie wrote:
After a hard evening in the pub.. leaving and going to bed before midnight and NOT eating anything apart from peanuts and crisps perhaps.. a good many could still be way over the drink limit the following lunch time.


Would drinking on an empty stomach not mean that the alcohol was absorbed more quickly than if the stomach was full, and therefore would not be metabolised any slower?




If you drink on "empty" - alcohol permeates stomach wall quicker and enters blood stream. Check out a post made over "Mellanby effect" n archives around June 2004.. in which I gave the medical version and IG the police side of things.

If you consume this with a carbonated substance.. and wine spritzers and alcopops are notorious in this .. the fizzy substance helps take the alcohol through the stomach lining and into the blood stream and thus into brain .. all the quicker. The food .. especially if you ate cheeses (not an old wive tale .. them French do understand "l'estomac" as "gourmet" after all :wink: .. but it does absorb some of the alcohol and reduces the flow through the stomach wall straight into the blood stream - as it ensures the gastic acids break down properly.. absorbing the nutrients and sending rest to waste and ballast through the gut and bowel to put in very simplistic terms :wink: I do not do "jargon". I want things to be readily understood :wink: You can look up the science and biology of all this on-line and in any biology book after all :wink:


Quote:

The fact of the matter is that the government ads tell us not to try to calculate the limit, 'because we can't', but it is entirely possible that you could still be over in the morning, as evidenced in many cases. So where does this leave the driver in terms of knowing if they're safe to drive?




I think .. if you feel :censored:... have a tongue which could sandpaper the skirting boards.. tasting like tin or sandpaper.. feel "urrghhhhhhhhhhhhh" and have a serious headache as well - then safe to conclude you are "hung over" :wink:


Quote:
It doesn't make sense to me that we wait until drivers have been convicted of drink driving to educate them about it. I feel that it should be part of the syllabus discussed by the instructor, and should feature far more heavily in the theory test too. Perhaps a whole additional section of the theory test on 'Human Factors', encompassing drink, drugs, fatigue, cognative failure etc.


Agreed. We need a serious education programme over this.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.016s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]