Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Nov 11, 2026 20:43

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:09 
Offline
Pending Verification

Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:14
Posts: 2
Hello,
I have received NIP saying FAILED TO CONFORM TO THE INDICATION BY A TRAFFIC LIGHT. It was issued on the day that Britain was covered by snow (Thursday Feb. 8 2007), in the morning about 9:30 . I was driving to work after beating the snow, slow traffic and broken down cars on the M1, I was nearly arriving to work when I was snapped by the camera.

I want an advice, wether it is a good idea or not to write a letter and attach it to the NIP and sent it saying that it is due to the bad weather condition to make an excuse so that I can be pardoned or is there any other way or means that I can get away from getting 3 points.

By the way my recorded speed was 20mph on 30mph road if it is important to mention it here

Any advice is appreciated.

F


Last edited by Faith on Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:29, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:25 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
So you were not able to stop for a red light so jumping it, in the snow, at a decent lick of speed – and expect us to find an excuse for you? Sorry but there is no excuse.

I think you’ve been put through to the wrong web site. The only advice you'll get here is that you must better your driving technique so you can drive appropriately for the conditions.


Last edited by Steve on Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:26, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
If you are looking for advice on how to avoid being done for breaking the law, then you are definately in the wrong place.

If however you didn't see the traffic light because it was completely covered in snow, then that is about as good a defence as any (although going through a set of completely obscured lights at 20mph isn't my idea of safe driving).

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:28 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Gixxer wrote:
If however you didn't see the traffic light because it was completely covered in snow, then that is about as good a defence as any.

Don't they usually have those rounded shelf shaped protectors above each lamp to prevent snow build-up?

It would be interesting to know how if anyone else was caught out by this kind of problem.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
smeggy wrote:
Gixxer wrote:
If however you didn't see the traffic light because it was completely covered in snow, then that is about as good a defence as any.

Don't they usually have those rounded shelf shaped protectors above each lamp to prevent snow build-up?

Yes they do Smeggy, although I suppose if they were hit by a Force 10 blizzard then it is possible that the snow could build up and obscure the lamp.

Either way, the photograph will show the state of the traffic signal as well as how many seconds had elapsed between red and the breach taking place.

As you said above though, there is no excuse for approaching a set of lights at the speed & conditions described and maybe the OP should consider themselves lucky they are not being done for driving without due care as well.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 13:05 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Gixxer wrote:
...maybe the OP should consider themselves lucky they are not being done for driving without due care as well.


Probably the OP should consider themselves a stinky troll.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 13:33 
Offline
Pending Verification

Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:14
Posts: 2
Here don't get me wrong, I been driving on the same road for more than 5 years and never past a traffic light on RED, but on that day my attention my been distructed due to the bad weather and can mistakenly passed and to my knowledge I didn't cause any inconvinience to other road users.

My question is that is it a good way to write a letter and mention the road condition might cause distruction or writing a letter will automatically harm my defence in any case?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 13:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Faith wrote:
My question is that is it a good way to write a letter and mention the road condition might cause distruction

Are you seriously saying that a bit of bad weather was the cause of your inability to notice a traffic signal??
If so, please give up driving before you hurt somebody.

Quote:
or writing a letter will automatically harm my defence in any case?

Erm, you don't have a defence.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 14:06 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Agree with Gixxer. Also:

Faith wrote:
and to my knowledge I didn't cause any inconvinience to other road users.

Just because you didn't cause an inconvenience/accident it doesn't mean you were not creating a risk of it. Given the conditions you describe, I would say you were fortunate not to have been in an accident.


Stop trying to excuse your behaviour!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 17:24 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Faith wrote:
Hello,
I have received NIP saying FAILED TO CONFORM TO THE INDICATION BY A TRAFFIC LIGHT. It was issued on the day that Britain was covered by snow (Thursday Feb. 8 2007), in the morning about 9:30 . I was driving to work after beating the snow, slow traffic and broken down cars on the M1, I was nearly arriving to work when I was snapped by the camera.

I want an advice, wether it is a good idea or not to write a letter and attach it to the NIP and sent it saying that it is due to the bad weather condition to make an excuse so that I can be pardoned or is there any other way or means that I can get away from getting 3 points.

By the way my recorded speed was 20mph on 30mph road if it is important to mention it here

Any advice is appreciated.

F


This user's account has been set to 'pending verification' status. See: http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewt ... 938#125938

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.011s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]