Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jun 21, 2026 23:55

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 23:32 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Rigpig wrote:
Edit <Actually I can't be bothered>


Actually I thought it was quite good before you deleted it.

I would say "never argue with an imbecile, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience"

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 00:17 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 23:56
Posts: 252
Location: Manchester
botach wrote:
Rigpig wrote:
botach wrote:
(IN CAPS AS A SHOUT TO HANDY )
AND OUR GOVERNMENT HAS THE GALL TO CALL LETTERBOMBS UNDEMOCRATIC

--Like removing saadam without a MANDATE ???????

Yes -handy -


You utter prat! You are way over your intellectual depth here.



TUT TIT RIGPIG - DO I DETECT A HINT OF ADHOMINE(or your lack of IQ
PLEASE ATTACK MY ARGUEMENT OR DESIST.
I only offered a comparison --you did the rest
(And btw - note my objection to the letterbombs - DON'T JUMP IN WITH BOTH FEET ,ASSUMMING MASS SUPPORT)


The war against Iraq was sanctioned by democratic process in this country, from a vote by parliament. It was also sanctioned in the USA by the US senate.

Your argument is pathetic.

There can be no grounds whatsoever to sympathise with anybody who feels they have to resort to sending explosive devices through the post. The only damage those devices will cause are to people - people. Not speed cameras. Not institutions. People with families and friends.

Handy is quite correct, the sentiment is sickening. I wouldn't even begin to think of typing 'its horrible but understandable' because I can never, in a million years, understand the reasoning and lack of morality in sending devices designed to kill or maim innocent people for doing a job which is quite legal.

Blow up a camera if you like, and I'd slap your back. Blow up a person? Its abhorrent, and a great deal of damage could be done to this campaign if a statement isn't issued that expresses that sentiment in clear concise language.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 00:37 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
The worrying thing, whislt I agree wholeheartedly with Prof Beard, is that this will escalate and it will soon become seen as a 'legitimate' method of protest.

Lets face it, HMG ignored the outcry about poll tax, we then had the poll tax riots.

What does the future bring? Speed cam bombings, Inheritence tax riots?

I hope not but wouldn't be surprised.

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 01:02 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
does he do requests? I've got an address for camden "parking solutions".

seriously though, like said only a matter of time before people flip.

See the news the other day, the police are unable to secure a conviction in 95% of reported rapes, yet park for 2 minutes in contravention to a minor parking law where i live and there's a 95+% chance you'll be fined. and you won't have right of appeal like the rapist either, as you don't get a fair trial anyway.

It's a mockery of justice, and you can't expect people to keep respecting a system of law and order that fails them when they need it yet persecutes them with nazi efficiency for the most minor of pathetic "offences". And when people lose that respect they may decide to reclaim the liberties we give up to the system thats supposed to protect us.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:03 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
prof beard wrote:
As I said earlier such acts of individual violence are totally against my beliefs and morality, but to some extent they are the product of a population which feels alienated from the democratic process and feels that its government is not only unresponsive but acting in a cavalier manner as regards rights, freedom etc. To that extent I fear (note - fear not hope for) such things will only happen more.


There's a critical aspect of this that I disagree with.

If a group or organisation emerged to 'fight the government' in such a way, then you can call it 'alienation from the democratic process'. But when it's a single individual, representing no one, he's just a nutter.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:16 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
SafeSpeed wrote:
prof beard wrote:
As I said earlier such acts of individual violence are totally against my beliefs and morality, but to some extent they are the product of a population which feels alienated from the democratic process and feels that its government is not only unresponsive but acting in a cavalier manner as regards rights, freedom etc. To that extent I fear (note - fear not hope for) such things will only happen more.


There's a critical aspect of this that I disagree with.

If a group or organisation emerged to 'fight the government' in such a way, then you can call it 'alienation from the democratic process'. But when it's a single individual, representing no one, he's just a nutter.


You miss my point - organised stuff is "collective". It may be in legal terms legitimate or not (eg terrorist groups are "collective" but not normally regarded as a good thing! The reason that exist, though may have valid basis even if their actions do not). Nevertheless alienation from the democratic process can be very much an individual thing, individuals can feel totally disempowered and crushed by forces outside their control. The alienation is very real, many will respond be seeking others who feel likewise, some will not. Thise who do not may react in "reasonable ways" others may "behave like nutters".

Example - at one point their was only one Paul Smith - you started a campaign - at what point did you change from nutter to reasonable? (Joke of course but a fair analogy). If instead of launching a campaign you had become a camera destroyer, many would have said you were a nutter, but many would have sympathised even whilst disapproving. If you had started sending people firebombs, people would have said you were a nutter and hopefully condemned your actions.

What I'm saying is the alienation is real for all of the above but the response ranges from essentially democratic, through the "individual direct action" to the "dangerous nutter". Hope you see what I mean.

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Last edited by prof beard on Thu Feb 08, 2007 13:22, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:21 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
condemned?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 13:21 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
RobinXe wrote:
condemned?


Correct! Ooops - have edited original - damn figers (sic) !

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 13:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
Yeah, I get it. The actions of the individual do not necessarily discredit the sentiment behind the actions, but they do discredit the individual.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 16:15 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
To send a letter bomb is contemptable. Anyone who cannot see this, or indeed chooses to do it is a complete idiot. He deserves the strongest possible punishment!

That said The implacible punishment machine that islington elite have created has created a climate of immense frustration. We may be sensible, reasoned individuals but some out there are not.

Hence my comment. The SCP and the auto justice initiatives haven't saved any lives but they have created a source of resentment and a target for nutters!

As it happens a very close relative works in DVLA and was evacuated yesterday. The nutter who sent the bomb wouldn't have too much about the police had he hurt her. However, when did she sign up as a target for nutters as a result of gov't policy?

Unintended consequences!!!!!!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 21:32 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
My comparisons between the actions of the idiots with parcel bombs and the idiots in charge of the UK and USA appear to have been misread.(Having spent several years a a bomb warden in govt premises i know how stressfull it can be)
Instead of inspiring some debate it appears to be a challenge to some to take comments the wrong way and then try to qualify/justify their comments . I'm not concerned , i just turn the other cheek, but JUST HOW MUCH HARM TO THE SS CAUSE does it do to have people slanging others ( in violation of rules, with no retribution). Bit like saying that we condone lawbreaking - which we don't.(And don't forget Kevin could be lurking)
So Paul - how about an equal playing field - if a member steps over the line -hit them as hard as you did our old adverisery BW.
Then no one outside can complain.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 22:12 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
botach wrote:
My comparisons between the actions of the idiots with parcel bombs and the idiots in charge of the UK and USA appear to have been misread.


OK then, seeing as you won't let this lie...

Please explain clearly and concisely how your comments should have been read.
I am keen to know for example where your assertion that the UK government have called letterbombs 'undemocratic' came from, as this appears to be a fundamental keystone of your 'argument'.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 22:38 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 07:53
Posts: 460
Quote:
"The worrying thing, whislt I agree wholeheartedly with Prof Beard, is that this will escalate and it will soon become seen as a 'legitimate' method of protest. "



Worked for the IRA, they bombed their way into the 'democratic' process with I might add, numerable concessions that included early release for killers of women and children and, provisions for terrorists such as McGuinness and Adams, who still have not yet sworn an oath to Her Majesty.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 23:21 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
The matter is still being investigated. Lot of this is "media speculation" in reality.

The first letter bombs seem to indicate some link to animal rights activists - and is in keeping with past tactics from them.

The last four ..?

Boss of a security firm.. (own home - happens to be work address per press)

Capita - deal with Congestion charging

Vantis - accountants and registered office of client Speed Check which deals with traffic regualation and not Speed Cams

DVLA - licencing and registration.

Does not follow then that this is someone :censored: off with a speed camera .. but possibly over a congestion charge fine or parking fine. :?

Whatever - we are looking for a dangerous idiot .. possibly two given the devices sent to the forensic labs.

The speculation regarding the link to a "disgruntled motorist" originates mainly from the press and other media.

:roll:

Ironically - the forensic labs will prpbably find all they need to trace this sick person .. and hopefully my colleagues down south will get their collar asap.

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 00:18 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Rigpig wrote:
botach wrote:
My comparisons between the actions of the idiots with parcel bombs and the idiots in charge of the UK and USA appear to have been misread.


OK then, seeing as you won't let this lie...

Please explain clearly and concisely how your comments should have been read.
I am keen to know for example where your assertion that the UK government have called letterbombs 'undemocratic' came from, as this appears to be a fundamental keystone of your 'argument'.

I am keen to know how you can get away with AH when others get banned /suspended for other so called trivial items.

Please explain.

OH-BTW - IWON'T LET THE COMMENTS LIE AS I CONSIDER THEM AH.[/quote]


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 01:07 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 21:24
Posts: 103
aparrently that was just practice for the real thing LOL :o


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 01:21 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
I thought the original poseter of the ad hominem had deleted (retracted) the uncalled-for statement, but that it now appears in a quote by the person sleighted, as if to not accept the deletion. I am happy that the original post has been removed. If there are still issues, please taske them off group.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 02:01 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
nicycle wrote:
MGBGT wrote:
Oh and, Nicycle - Congestion Charging is a good scheme? Oh dear! I think that those greenhouse gases are starting to get to you...


Having traveled around the centre of London by underground, bus, walking and cycling, and with my dad cycling from the station to work daily, I will happily defend the Congestion Charging scheme.

No form of transport is the best, however once you get to a certain level of density, the private car fails to be able to serve everyone. It wouldn't be good to have too many people driving, and people should only really drive in the centre of London if there's no other transport option. In a democracy the typical way of doing this is by charging, which may not be ideal but it works.

By all means come and drive here, the roads have space capacity and parking space for everyone, but if you're going into central London I would advise you to change your form at travel when it becomes convenient to.


:rotfl:

The devil :evil: :twisted: :twisted: in me just had to type up a letter published in CW by a cyclist who does not want any more Kengestion charging. He or she thinks empty roads mean :steering: :legorally: :steering: way tooooo fast :shock:

But Durham has a charge to enter the City. I know York and Canterbury do not charge.. but the same reasonable Park and Ride schemes operate and I think they charge within reason at the Park and Ride. Manchester, alas, does not seem to have this facility and there's the matter of where .

Could be someone who got a Kengestion and a parking fine whilst in London .. and insane as well But this is pure speculation fuelled by reading the tabloids on the subject. :popcorn:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 02:28 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
Rigpig wrote:
botach wrote:
My comparisons between the actions of the idiots with parcel bombs and the idiots in charge of the UK and USA appear to have been misread.


OK then, seeing as you won't let this lie...

Please explain clearly and concisely how your comments should have been read.
I am keen to know for example where your assertion that the UK government have called letterbombs 'undemocratic' came from, as this appears to be a fundamental keystone of your 'argument'.


I think it was was of the red tabloids misquoting something or other.. I cannot recall which one I browsed in ... but I seem to recall shuddering in disbelief whilst waiting of my wife to finish "powdering her nose" mid shop.

Well :wink: a guy's gotta spend some time discreetly waiting :lol:

Oh the joys of some hack's way with words :roll: Perhaps I should have gone to the little boys' room as well.. :lol:

I would have written "unlawful and wanton criminal disrespect" for postal workers and ordinary folk who sort this mail in the mail rooms at these etablishments.

There are legal ways of expressing anger or dissatisfaction with the " present status quo". The nutcase doing this very much undermines the calm chipping away for a more practical and acceptable way of fighting to get folk to respect road safety, their cars, their licences, each other on the roads. Violence of this nature seriously (if committed by some idiot who feels hard done to over a parking/congestion fine - and comment based on last three targets - and pure conjecture on my part ) undermines any practical approaches to change attitude and behaviour for the better.



Arguing and falling out with each other in a discussion will not help matters either. So.. take deep breath botach. and Riggers and whoever as I am barging into a conversation "halfway through here".. . and breathe in and out calmly.

Or :hehe: use a smiley guy! :wink:

But.. back to the story.. pure speculation on part of media as to who is behind all this. Hopefully - this dangerous idiot(s) will be caught soon .. and - er - prove - we do actually go catch "proper :roll: " criminals.

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 00:06
Posts: 301
Location: Swindon
I've just had a thought.

Didn't Capita supply the much maligned CSA computer system?
It'd tie in with the forensic labs being bombed-IF there were any links with the rest of the companies that got letterbombs.


(I'd like to point out that my comment about not blaming the bomber was borne out of frustration at this government and the needless beaurocracy that it seems so fond on propagating rather than condoning the abhorrent acts that are being committed against the individual employees-which I most certainly do NOT. )

_________________
Smokebelching,CO2 making,child murdering planet raping,granny mugging,politically incorrect globally warming (or is it climate changing now it's getting colder?)thug.
That's what the government want you to believe of me. If they get back in I'm emigrating.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.058s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]