Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 17:42

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 09:42 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
speed kills wrote:
but with any luck I can get something on my new street, to help me get to sleep.


Stupid is as as stupid does.... :lol:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 16:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
speed kills wrote:
When they first put them in, and people were still using my street, I would go to sleep at night, with amazing ease, like white noise to a baby. Sometimes if I was lucky someone would hit one hard, just as I was dropping off, that would give me a little chuckle, and sweet dreams all night.
I'm sure we could change that, so I'd advise you not to mention where it is. :twisted:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2004 11:43 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 22:27
Posts: 45
Just behind the Mount Rd chingford, but I dont live there anymore.

I was thinking a set of pedestrian lights, in front of my new place, I could stick the button in with blue tack and listen to the bleep bleep all night.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:41 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:18
Posts: 67
Location: Nottingham
Why don't drivers sound their horns when negociating speed humps in the day (to alert other road users of their presence) and rev their engines at night whilst changing down gear (in order to comply with the law on sounding horns at night)...? :lol:

Not that I'd ever do anything like that!

Surely putting obstacles into roads that cause damage to vehicles travelling over them within the legal speed limit (and discomfort to the occupants) puts the councils on thin ice legally. If you had an accident as a result of a collapsed sewer or pothole you could sue the council so why not speed ramps? Just wondering.....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:49 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
tim.tonal wrote:
Why don't drivers [.....] when negociating speed humps [....] rev their engines at night whilst changing down gear (in order to comply with the law on sounding horns at night)...? :lol:
{snip}


Simply because taking these things with the transmission engaged exacerbates the damage potential to drive shafts and diff. Doing so in a low gear exacerbates it more. I have an auto so can't readily do anything about this, but in a manual car I invariably dip the clutch going over those things.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 23:24 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 22:27
Posts: 45
[quote="tim.tonal"]Why don't drivers sound their horns when negociating speed humps in the day (to alert other road users of their presence) and rev their engines at night whilst changing down gear (in order to comply with the law on sounding horns at night)...? :lol:

Not that I'd ever do anything like that!.....[/quote]

Some people may enjoy hearing you getting all flustered.

London E1 is the worst I know, for bumps, nightmare. Anyone know any worse? Its all very well having them on your street, its another when you have to drive over them all day.

_________________
If you cant pay the fine then dont do the crime.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 00:18 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
tim.tonal wrote:
Why don't drivers sound their horns when negociating speed humps in the day (to alert other road users of their presence) and rev their engines at night whilst changing down gear (in order to comply with the law on sounding horns at night)...? :lol:


Got a 20 limit near me with bumps. I ususaly drive through in first gear. Get black looks from the locals...but hey, you can't have it both ways... :lol:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 01:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 01:10
Posts: 36
Theres cracking example of potential "killer" speed humps by me, they are more cusions, if you line your wheels up with them you can go over without being effected, even encountering them for the first time you realise you have no need to slow down, so you spend you time concentrating on lining yourself up with the humps.

this is dangerous enough on a normal road, BUT they decided to place them on a steep hill next to a large park, very few cars drop there speed now people are used to them, if you watch people coming down the hill you will see there eyes glued to the floor, "Bump", "A child? Where?"

I`m sure the think of the children brigade will be after even more humps and a speed camara when a child gets hurt there, "But what do you mean the driver wasnt speeding??? he must of been he ran someone over"
[/img]


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2004 17:51 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
The recent bout of snowy weather underlined another potential problem with humps.

They can easily be partly or completely hidden by accumulations of snow, and, at a time when grip is limited anyway, hitting one unexpectedly could cause you to veer off course and possibly cause an accident.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2004 19:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
PeterE wrote:
The recent bout of snowy weather underlined another potential problem with humps.

They can easily be partly or completely hidden by accumulations of snow.


There are supposed to be strict guidelines as to the signposting of road humps (with requirements that the signs be lit etc. etc.), just like there are supposed to be guidelines for speed limit signage.

I and everyone in here can probably cite at least one example in their locale of the flouting of these regulations (my own being the set of humps on the only exit from my street - the humps are complete but there are only the posts for signs, and trenches cut in the pavement for the wiring to the lights).

:roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 05:10 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
PeterE wrote:
The recent bout of snowy weather underlined another potential problem with humps.

They can easily be partly or completely hidden by accumulations of snow, and, at a time when grip is limited anyway, hitting one unexpectedly could cause you to veer off course and possibly cause an accident.


That's true - and it's not an effect that I've considered before.

Has anyone had a nasty experience with a snow covered / snow hidden hump? There might be a PR opportunity here.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 01:39 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 22:27
Posts: 45
I noticed the council have put the hump back outside of Ian Beesleys house (not that it was ever right outside), and as yet Beesley hasnt made good on his promise to remove it again!

Whats he waiting for?

Maybe he hasnt noticed it yet???

Its only been there since dec 10th

But a big brave guy like beesley shorely isnt afraid of going to jail.

_________________
If you cant pay the fine then dont do the crime.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 02:26 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 00:14
Posts: 535
Location: Victoria, Australia
I have a feeling that your last 2 posts might have finally pushed Paul, and the rest of us, too far. I would not be surprised if today was the last time we see you...

_________________
Ross

Yes I'm a hoon, but only on the track!!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 08:07 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
M3RBMW wrote:
I have a feeling that your last 2 posts might have finally pushed Paul, and the rest of us, too far. I would not be surprised if today was the last time we see you...


Another Troll bites the dust........ :lol:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: humps
PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 22:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 14:51
Posts: 21
In their wisdom Fife council have installed speed humps throughout the whole of glenrothes, in some bizarre places... although I have been going over them well under the speed limit, I've already had to replace the front suspension on my car, and notice now that the exhaust is hanging loose. They have placed the bumps in areas where there was never a speed problem, in one street in particular its almost comical... the road is narrow nad always has a row of parked cars along one side.. I have never seen anyone able to do more than 10mph here, yet we have bumps. why?

They have also installed massively high zebra crossings, raised off the road by an unbelievable height.. at 3am one morning while coming home i decided to try and go over it at the 30mph legal limit, and was duly catapulted out of my seat and hit my head off the roof.

If I'm within the speed limit, surely I should NOT be jolted in this way... and the council should be accountable for damage.

Where it is beyond a joke though is in coaltown of weymss.. a town which has now been "traffic calmed" with islands jutting out into the middle of the street, and priority signs. You come off a 60mph country road into the village, round a blind corner and instantly into one of the islands with no warning whatsoever.

one resident commented in the local paper that he has never seen an accident in the town in 50 years of living there, but has personally witnessed 6 in the 2 months since the "traffic calming" measures were brought in.

I can see its only a matter of time before a driver comes round the blind bend and swerves to avoid the island, knocking down a child in the process.

Fife council have gone completely mad.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 14:23 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:06
Posts: 72
Location: London
basingwerk wrote:
Gatsobait wrote:
Also waiting for your thoughts on traffic calming measures simply moving the problem to a different area.


Yes, I know what you mean. I have opened a thread on 'contention' but SafeSpeed has dis'd it, so I am a bit reluctant to reveal my thoughts on this in case I get another beating.

But I'm basingwerk, so what the hell do I care if the world isn't ready! OK, from the top. One intent of traffic calming measures is to manage contention and it’s counter part, congestion. That is, different road users competing for the same, limited resource. When you want to make it safer for pedestrian road users, one idea is to make a route less attractive to drivers by adding penalties, in the form of humps, charges, cameras, limits, zig zags or whatever you can dream up. The same idea can also slow cars down (rather than divert them), which is another matter which we can talk about some other time. In this case, drivers will avoid the measures if there is a 'better' route. So for the purposes of this argument, the very intent is to move the problem. This implies that traffic calming measures have to be 'tuned' to identify and remove round robin effects, where the problem goes here and there or even round in circles, the intent being to move it to a through road or discourage journeys entirely.

I think that’s right?


So just how many Shares do you have in the Speed Camera operators in the UK?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 15:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 13:24
Posts: 26
Location: Huntingdon
In Grafham, a small village in Cambridgeshire, the local council have recently "calmed" the through road with the usual pletora of humps, chicanes, and red paint. The problem is that there is a double bend in the middle of the village, and there are now humps on both sides - actually on the bend.

Bad enough for cars if there is a bit of frost on the ground - but if you are a motorcyclist .... can you now sue the council for attempted manslaughter??


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 20:06 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Rick99 wrote:
Bad enough for cars if there is a bit of frost on the ground - but if you are a motorcyclist


Any other areas got posts/bollards on the edge of pavement on humps/tables etc.Warks has after a local councillor skidded on one in frosty weather and ended up on the pavement.That panicked them.Ok for a car - occupants are well protected against these , but i pity bikers if they slide onto one of these.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 14:36 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
My sister lives in Southend on Sea, where many are the speed humps are illegally high, to the extent that the underside of her unmodified audi A2 has been damaged.
I actually can't drive the Chimaera to visit her as it wouldn't make it over the humps.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 18:31 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
stackmonkey wrote:
My sister lives in Southend on Sea, where many are the speed humps are illegally high, to the extent that the underside of her unmodified audi A2 has been damaged.

I actually can't drive the Chimaera to visit her as it wouldn't make it over the humps.

Better get a massive f*ck-off 4x4 then :evil:

Oops :oops:

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.847s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]