I've rushed out a quick PR to get the ball rolling at 22:56. We're missed tomorrow's papers, which is OK.
PR433: Speed camera plans wildly optimistic
news: for immediate release
Figures released today by Department for Transport showing latest accounts of
the various speed camera partnerships reveal that most partnerships issued far
fewer fines than expected.
Difference between 'operational case' and 'actual' figures for each partnership:
Avon and Somerset -36%
West Midlands -30%
Greater Manchester -26%
Derbyshire -25%
Cleveland -24%
Cambridgeshire -22%
Wiltshire and Swindon -17%
London -16%
Hampshire -16%
Norfolk -14%
Cheshire -14%
Suffolk -13%
Warwickshire -12%
Nottinghamshire -12%
Kent and medway -12%
Hertfordshire -11%
Bedfordshire and Luton -10%
Devon and Cornwall -10%
Dorset -9%
Mid and South Wales -8%
West Mercia -5%
Surrey -4%
Thames Valley -3%
Northamptonshire -3%
Cumbria -3%
Gloucestershire -2%
North Wales -1%
West Yorkshire 0%
Merseyside 1%
Humberside 1%
South Yorks 2%
Northumbria 3%
Lincolnhire 7%
Essex 9%
Staffordshire 10%
Sussex 10%
Leicestershire 11%
Lancashire 15%
* 27 out of 38 partnerships issued fewer fines than expected.
* In 18 partnerships the shortfall was 10% or greater
* In 6 partnerships the shortfall was greater than 20%
Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety campaign
(
www.safespeed.org.uk) said: "If there's one thing that has characterised the
speed camera programme from start to finish it's wild optimism. Every
single new set of real world figures makes speed cameras look worse. The beauty
is fading, and not before time. Speed cameras are a failed road safety policy.
They have made road safety worse; cost over £1 billion since 1993 and issued
over 16 million fixed penalty notices."
"The reputation of speed cameras sinks further with every day that passes. How
much longer do we have to wait for the inevitable admission of failure and the
final scrapping of all the infernal devices?"
"Speed cameras are entirely founded on false assumptions, dodgy science and
wishful thinking."
<ends>
Notes for editors
=================
Note that these figures have been available since around September 2006. The
choice of publication date is probably intended to coincide with VERY BAD NEWS
for the speed camera programme expected from Hull Crown Court on Thursday.
DfT partnership accounts for year 2005/6:
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/d ... rvertempla
te/dft_index.hcst?n=17621&l=2
Further analysis to follow...
***
I'm going to get something to eat, then figure out how the hell I'm going to deal with the rest. It's also a spoiler story, so tomorrow should be very interesting indeed.