Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Oct 28, 2025 20:33

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 20:24 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: It's a pity that MOSIS (look that up on Wikipedia) has been suspended as I'd like to sink my fangs into his worthless hide. He claims he's never seen these :camera: :880:. I'd say that was an inability to read the road conditions. Secondly, a compulsion to stare at the speedo smacks of inattention. Thirdly, inablility to respond cogently without foul and abusive language = impatience. I'd say he's a potential road rager and an accident waiting to happen.

Let him hand over his "evidence" to the police. He'll probaly find his covert surveillance is a breach of the Human Rights Act.

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 23:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 00:51
Posts: 160
I kep hearing on our local radio station "Speeding it's not spectacular"
Liar, it IS in the right place, Formula one, drag racing the TT for example

I feel a complaint to the ASA coming on anytime now :lol:

_________________
Welcome to the UK, the Land of "Selective Freedoms"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 01:24 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
ed_m wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
My answer is: Speeding is a side effect of the safe driving process.


i'm not completely sure i buy this.

cameras not withstanding, i make a concious effort to keep track of what the limit is.
and knowing this i (sometimes) make a concious choice to exceed it depending on the road & conditions amnd a zillion other (yes maybe subconcious) variables.... the amount to which i choose to exceed it also varies based on the above.

i guess it depends on the kind of road you travel on... 50% of the time (i.e. in town & on NSL lanes) i'd say i run on subconcious speed choice with the limit being mostly a periperal concern.

the other 50% on free flowing mways, DC & major SC the max speed my subconcious would go to may be significantly beyond the limit.. hence my choice is governed by a perceived acceptable margin over the limit for that particular road.

and in the case of approaching a bend on a major SC road i would say yes i do switch easily between the two methods of speed selection.


I reckon you're thinking about the wrong sorts of hazards, and the wrong sort of performance failure.

Lets say kids playing on the pavement well ahead. As you get closer your concern rises, and as you get very close, one runs out suddenly from the group.

I'm pretty sure that I'd first lift off LATER (but maybe not by much) if I was trying to drive to the speed limit. There HAS to be a mode switch and it has to take time and resources.

The bend is a bad example, because it isn't (normally) an accident risk situation - it just 'normal driving' and you have plenty of time to adjust to the requirements of the bend.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 09:10 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 23:42
Posts: 200
Location: Milton Keynes
If you are basing your speed decisions primarily on the number on a stick, I think it is natural and inevitable that you will end up paying less attention to other factors. It isn't a conscious thought ("I only need to look out for red circles, no need to watch for children"). More that your ongoing process of judging an appropriate speed becomes less relevent because nothing you do depends on the outcome, except for those occasions where the appropriate speed dips below the speed limit. (Situations that are becoming increasingly rare as speed limits are lowered, it seems to me.) I think the effects will go further. If you are paying less attention to hazard assessment and reacting to possible hazards, there is less demand to notice hazards around you.

I think the whole approach naturally tends to reduce drivers to 'convoy' mode where they concentrate on the speed limit signs, their speedo, and the distance to the car in front. It's a frightening prospect and I think it's happening right now.

_________________
Peter Humphries (and a green V8S)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
mosis2 wrote:

I've got four lovely cameras mounted in my car and I'm compiling a nice body of evidence against speeding drivers (and other bad drivers). I'll be taking my first compilation to the police tomorrow - eight cases of dangerous driving, in only one week. I'll be interested to see what they do with unequivocal evidence. Let's hope some of your lot are on there...


That was posted two days ago and, so he said, he was going to the police with the 'evidence' yesterday.
Maybe he should be 'un-suspended' so that he can tell us all how he got on with the Old Bill. I would think they laughed at him, behind his back if not to his face.
If he's so interested in filming illegal activities, why does he not go and film drug dealers outside schools, clubs and pubs? Now, that would be interesting, until one of them 'dealt' with him, that is.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 15:07 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
I'm sure he would find at least one ignorant little politically correct wannabee who would take him seriously enough to waste a few k's of tax-payers' money investigating this....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 16:08 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 02:07
Posts: 242
How about "I need to speed because if I go at the speed limit then the next traffic light (after the one I've just moved off from) will turn red on me just as I'm about to reach it because they're programmed that way so that you just get caught at them all. But if I go a few mph over the speed limit I can get through the next one just in time and then I'll get green lights on all the remaining ones too....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 23:20 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 00:14
Posts: 535
Location: Victoria, Australia
That's the plan. Over here they would setup a covert camera so they could rake in some extra money..... :evil:

_________________
Ross

Yes I'm a hoon, but only on the track!!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 09:03 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:26
Posts: 35
How about - 'I regularly drive above the limit because a greater and greater pecentage of the rural speed limits in Oxfordshire are a complete
joke and I take responsibility for my own actions.'
Sensibly set limits will engender respect; poorly set limits do not.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 09:16 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
Or how about - I always drive at an appropriate speed for the conditions.

To me, safety takes priority...

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 22:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
I just have to ask the question, what extra benefit would one get from 4 cameras over and above just one?
Maybe it is so he can say he has more cameras than brain cells? :lol:

Also, I recall seeing one of these reality police thingies, which featured a chap who had a camera mouted on his dash. The police used the videos in educational courses, I believe it was stated that they couldn't be used evidentially. Even though some guy was filmed driving up the hard shoulder to avoid a jam.

Also, one other point, isn't the film from a police car used only to support the accusation of the Officer in question? It isn't the primary evidence to the best of my knowledge.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 06:07 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
How bizarre that every copper judge and prosicution lawer is prossicuting you for something they do themselves almost every day!

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 12:07 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
20 mph speedd limit and humps did not stop a 7 ton recovery truck from striking and killing a 10 year old outside a school per the Manchester press. The humps were high per a resident's quote in the paper.

A speed limit of 20 mph and humps did not save a lolly pop lady when a bus driver had a coughing fit and hit her.


As for his cameras and his claim that he has "speeding drivers".. unless his cams record the speed in same way as the gadgets in the cop cars do - then he has no evidence.

For example... we sometimes film things when on holiday as you miss nice scenery when you are driving :wink: You could not really measure the speed accurately - nor unless the person operating the camera record any example of "bad driving" unless specifically focussing the lens on this. I doubt very much whether mosis actually has these cameras or any "incriminating material". Nor do we know what sort of crimes he was committing as surely he has to take his eyes off the road to fiddle with this equipment as he is driving along. :wink:

What a plankwit! :roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
I've always wondered what I would say if pulled over for speeding.

"Sorry officer, I was concentrating on the road and my driving rather than staring at the speedo".

Wouldn't go down too well, eh.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 13:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Or conversly -"i couldn't have been speeding -i was watching my speedo" --"oh in that case due care or dangerous driving ",Sir" :lol:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 13:18 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Good evening sir, can you tell me how fast you were driving back there?

Yes officer. I was driving in full accordance with my training at a safe and appropriate speed according to the circumstances and taking full account of prevailing conditions.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 15:00 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 16:25
Posts: 41
Location: london
or sorry officer could'nt see you
because of my tinted windows, and i was looking at my sat nav. lighting a ciggie
oh and i got a text message from csp warning me of stealth cameras
goldy

_________________
Audere Est Facere.....To Dare Is To Do


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.021s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]