It's interesting to compare the press story (first message) with this official release:
http://www.safe2travel.co.uk/news/newsDetails.asp?id=42
12/03/2004
Constabulary to review speed camera policy
LANCASHIRE Constabulary is planning a review of its speed camera enforcement policy following discussion with other members of the county's road safety partnership.
Chief Constable Paul Stephenson revealed his plan for a review at today's meeting of the Lancashire Police Authority (11 March) in Blackburn. He explained he has established a small team at headquarters to look closely at all of the issues surrounding speed cameras in the county.
He said: "Speed cameras have created a great deal of interest, particularly over the way we enforce the more low level infringements detected by the equipment. The Lancashire Road Safety Partnership has achieved some key successes since its inception and our primary aim remains that of changing driver behaviour to reduce their speed and therefore the danger they create.
"Since the partnership was introduced, road traffic collisions at 47 of the safety camera sites have shown a reduction of 28.2 per cent. Research has shown that 54 per cent of motorists in Lancashire have reduced their speed and that average speed is down by 11 per cent. Now we anticipate that the 10-year target for people killed or seriously injured will be achieved ahead of schedule.
"Serious injuries have fallen by 16.11 per cent since 2001 and those seriously injured have dropped by 16.85 per cent. We remain concerned about the number of fatal accidents which have gone up by seven when compared to 2001 when the speed cameras were first introduced.
Mr Stephenson said: "The Constabulary remains committed to speed cameras and we recognise the value they have in reducing speed. Unfortunately certain aspects of the partnership's work has been occasionally misrepresented and an unbalanced picture painted but we know that the majority of people support our aims of sanctioning motorists who speed.
There is a perception that people who commit criminal offences and who, quite properly and according to guidelines, get a caution, get an easier ride than those who speed at the lower end. Whilst clearly the comparison is not a helpful one, I do nevertheless have some very real sympathy for this perception.
Any criminal justice system to be effective has to be seen to be fair. It just cannot be right when people feel that our response within that system is disproportionate.
"We recognise that there may be an opportunity, without damaging the positive outcomes we have already achieved, to soften the enforcement approach at the bottom end. There will still be enforcement but we need to be more imaginative in the way we deal with drivers who might just be over that speeding limit.
"The review will look to introduce cautioning for the bottom end range of speeding offences and look at a better trigger point for the speed awareness course that currently operates - this course has been recognised nationally as best in class.
"As well as increasing the range of disposals, i.e. cautioning through to prosecution, I have also asked the review to look much more closely at the use of interactive signage that warns drivers when they are in danger of speeding. Many people, and I have to say I am one of them, feel that this sort of device can have a very positive effect on peoples' driving behaviour, and that is, after all what we are trying to achieve. I am not interested in booking people for speeding, or raising revenue through fines. These are a means to an end and about persuading drivers not to speed.
"We will still be enforcing the law appropriately but with a better range of sanctions to bring a better balance to the system and make sure the punishment is proportionate to the offence.
"We remain resolute in our intentions to achieve, even more effectively, the very positive outcomes attained thus far. However, we are looking to do this in a way that maintains focus, but responds to widespread concerns about appropriate balance and fairness.
"Quite simply, if we can achieve the same very positive outcomes of making our roads safer, whilst at the same time demonstrating that we do listen then I for one would be delighted."
Dr Ruth Henig, chair of the police authority, said: We fully support this initiative as we believe this is paramount in continuing to produce the same sort of outcomes in terms of speed reduction and accident rates. The use of different penalties supports longer term education and promotion of road safety issues, but with less damage to public confidence and reassurance."