PR131: Continuing fraudulent speed camera claims
Safe Speed Press information

 
 
 release date: 15th July 2004 number: PR131

 
Title

PR131: Continuing fraudulent speed camera claims

Information for editors and journalists - NOT a press release for publication

Almost all the claims we hear for speed camera benefits in terms of reduced casualties, accidents, serious accidents, "KSI" or fatalities are FRADULENT and prepared on a FALSE basis.

The Department for Transport says, in "The Road Safety Good Practice Guide":

"5.119 This effect, sometimes called bias by selection, complicates evaluations at sites with high accident numbers (blackspot sites) in that these sites have often been chosen following a year with particularly high numbers occurring. In practice their accidents will tend to reduce in the next year even if no treatment is applied. Even if three-year accident totals are considered at the worst accident sites in an area, it is likely that the accident frequencies were at the high end of the naturally occurring random fluctuations, and in subsequent years these sites will experience lower numbers. This is known as regression-to-the-mean."


You can read Safe Speed's "regression to the mean" primer here:
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/rttm.html

The error is very well understood in road safety circles and it is undoubtedly fraudulent to create figures for speed camera benefits without accounting for this statistical effect.

With the rules for speed camera placement in partnership areas we estimate the size of the benefit illusion "at speed camera sites" to be 50%. So when a 40% benefit is claimed we might apply compensation for regression to the mea effect and conclude that the real effect of the cameras was to RAISE accidents by 10%.

Before publishing wild and inaccurate claims for speed camera effectiveness I urge you to ask:

"How have these figures been corrected for the regression to the mean effect?"
You don't have to take my word for it - ask a statistician.

Please don't contribute to misleading the public.

If you require any further information, please don't hesitate to get in touch.

Best Regards,
Paul Smith
Safe Speed
http://www.safespeed.org.uk
 
 

Notes and links

Comments regarding the recent DfT report on the Numberwatch web site:
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/2004_June.htm#speed

Previous Safe Speed PRs:
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/pr126.html
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/pr127.html

Recent Safe Speed letter to Professor Heydecker:
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/heydecker2.html

Professor Heydecker admits the error on Radio 4:
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/moreorless.html

DfT Report: "The national safety camera programme: Three-year evaluation report":
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_rdsafety/documents/downloadable/dft_rdsafety_029194.pdf

DfT Road Safety Good Practice Guide:
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_rdsafety/documents/page/dft_rdsafety_504564-06.hcsp

Professor John Adams (UCL) quoted in The Times, 25th June 2004
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-2-1157290,00.html

Professor Mervyn Stone (UCL) See...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/reports/pdf/humpfinal.pdf
 
 

About Safe Speed:

Since setting up Safe Speed in 2001, Paul Smith, 49, an advanced motorist and road safety enthusiast, and a professional engineer of 25 years UK experience, has carried out about 5,000 hours of research into the overall effects of speed camera policy on UK road safety. We believe that this is more work in more detail than anything carried out by any other organisation. Paul's surprising conclusion is that overall speed cameras make our roads more dangerous. Paul has identified and reported a number of major flaws and false assumptions in the claims made for speed cameras, and the whole "speed kills"  system of road safety.     

The inescapable conclusion is that we should urgently return to the excellent road safety policies that gave us in the UK the safest roads in the World in the first place.     

Safe Speed does not campaign against speed limits or appropriate enforcement of motoring laws, but argues vigorously that automated speed enforcement is neither safe nor appropriate.     
      

Contact Safe Speed:     

web: http://www.safespeed.org.uk     
email : psmith@safespeed.org.uk    
telephone: 01862 832000 anytime.     
mobile: 07799 045553     
note: the mobile does not work well at our office. Always try land line first.     
Location: North Scotland     

We are available for press and media interviews.

Back to Press Release Index Page


 
We have a strict editorial policy regarding factual content. If any fact anywhere on this web site can be shown to be incorrect we promise to remove it or correct it as soon as possible.
Copyright © SafeSpeed 2004
Created 18/07/2004. Last update 18/07/2004