fergl100 wrote:
I don't get annoyed when I see a cyclist going safely through on red. I think this issue is just used as a stick to beat cyclists with.
I do not think you would think that if had ever treated the result of this. I have. when I did A&E many years ago.
It's the law and these same idiots go on about speed limits - yet when the law's applied equally to them - they WHINGE and WHINE more!
Usually compalining that as they are "vulnerable" the law does not apply to them - or that's basically what I read between the lines.
Sorry - but red mans STOP and Red and Amber also mean STOP.
Amber on it's own means you can go if at the point of no return and it's "safe-ish" and Green means GO but look out for numpties who ignore their red lights and all emergencies on a shout.
Plain common sense and if you are too lazy to stop or do not have the oomph to start up again - then you ain't a a REAL cyclist!
Tis the challenge of the set off!
Part of the fun is to see how hard I can do the accelerate on my bike from stop
Nope - no sympathy or comprehension of plain DAFT and LAW breaking especially when a good many of these people are "holier than thou" if a driver makes the slightest harmless error.
I ride a bike - I DO NOT - NEVER HAVE - CAN NEVER SEEMYSELF going through a red light either in my car or on bike - and certainly never ever DELIBERATELY!
On the rare occasion when lights have stuck .. in car - whacked on the hazards and crossed with absolute caution - and used Green Cross and become a a PEDESTRIAN to cross when on the bike.
To me - that simple. Traffic lights and crossroads are not the same as blipping over a speed limit on a camber or on a straight motorway. There's a definite collision danger.