Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 13:05

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 15:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:36
Posts: 113
Location: Lincolnshire
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4947284.stm

Speaking outside the court, he said: "Speeding is a killer and I have campaigned all my life against speeding. Therefore the sentence on me, although massively inconvenient, is just.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:00 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
What utter fecking hypocrisy.

"I have campaigned all my life against speeding" but whilst doing so in the last three years he has been caught 5 times speeding. I wonder what the non current license history would look like.

The twit needs to keep his gob shut when he leaves court.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 12:09
Posts: 115
Location: South West
Speaking of the offences, he added: "Both times the condition was a clear stretch of road with no one else in the camera frame and no imminent danger to anyone else.

Pretty careless though, to be caught 5 times in 3 years.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:16 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Patch wrote:
What utter fecking hypocrisy.


Absolutely. He clearly speeds more than the average driver. If he truly believes 'speeding is a killer' why doesn't he turn himself in for a substantial prison sentence? It really annoys me that politicians never get called on this sort of hypocrisy.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:41 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
I believe that Mr Kinnocks case illustrates perfectly the two faces of the 'speeding' issue. He says he campaigns against speeding and yet is a serial speeder himself, obviously he is campaigning against other peoples speeding which is the killer, not his own.
Mr Kinnock is not alone of course, he sits alongside dozens of others:
    Local residents who arm themselves with speed cameras and then catch their neighbours
    Ministers for Transport
    Police officers
    Safety camera vans
    SafeSpeed hecklers
    Etc, etc

What a nonsense.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:41 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
gpmgroup wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4947284.stm

Speaking outside the court, he said: "Speeding is a killer and I have campaigned all my life against speeding. Therefore the sentence on me, although massively inconvenient, is just.


It must really hurt him to have made that statement :lol: .

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:42 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 14:04
Posts: 216
Location: Manchester
starfin wrote:
"Both times the condition was a clear stretch of road with no one else in the camera frame and no imminent danger to anyone else".


Doesn't this just highlight perfectly the argument for appropriate speed for the conditions?

_________________
Why can't we just use Common Sense?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:48 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Maybe he should be drafted into the M4 camera campaign since it was them that finally busted him. :lol:

At the very least he is another name for the "Celebrity Speeders" list :wink:

Quote:
"He was going above the speed limit as a result of sheer inadvertence.


Strange, I thought this was the worst kind of antisocial behaviour....well you live and learn.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Last edited by Gizmo on Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:54, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 16:52 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Safe Speed issued the following PR by GPRS cellular at 16:20 this afternoon:

PR308: Neil Kinnock - hypocrite

news: for immediate release

Following news reports regarding Neil Kinnock being banned from driving after
being caught speeding 5 times in three years...

The BBC reports that Neil Kinnock said: "Speeding is a killer and I have
campaigned all my life against speeding,"

Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety campaign
(www.safespeed.org.uk) said: "It just goes to show that politicians with high
ideals cannot keep to their own rules. Neil Kinnock, you are a hypocrite of the
first order."

"Experienced drivers know, as if by instinct, how fast to drive. We are very
good at choosing safe and appropriate speeds irrespective of the speed limit.
We will not get road safety back on track while this essential road safety
skill remains undervalued."

"Safety and the law are heading off in opposite directions - someone must get a
grip and quick."

<ends>

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 22:52 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Quote:
"As such you are disqualified from driving for six months. For each offence you will be fined £400 - it would have been £600 but for your guilty plea."

MAYBE he agreed to tout the speed adherance case in return for a lesser ban? 8-)

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 23:22 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
Well I expect Mr Kinnock will be ok and now be provided with a car and chauffer at taxpayers expense.
.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 06:17 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Dr L wrote:
Well I expect Mr Kinnock will be ok and now be provided with a car and chauffer at taxpayers expense.
.


Maybe Blairs bitch can drive. It could help to pay off her hair dressers bill.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 08:57 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
Gizmo wrote:
Maybe Blairs bitch can drive. It could help to pay off her hair dressers bill.

Well perhaps Mr Prescott's ex totty is now looking to help someone else.
.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Should we educate him
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:44 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:26
Posts: 194
Location: Burton on Trent
Hi Paul,
This is the high profile type of friend we need. He is ripe for the message - he knows he wasn't driving dangerously and the inconvienience of the system. ( he's a politician hence the apology and remorse and no use of hardship - no days of press hounding ). A nice letter explaining the case against speed cameras and asking for more independant research might give you a friend in high places.

Regards

Richard


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:56 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 14:55
Posts: 134
Location: Hérault, France
HalcyonRichard wrote:
Hi Paul,
This is the high profile type of friend we need. He is ripe for the message - he knows he wasn't driving dangerously and the inconvienience of the system. ( he's a politician hence the apology and remorse and no use of hardship - no days of press hounding ). A nice letter explaining the case against speed cameras and asking for more independant research might give you a friend in high places.

Regards

Richard


He knows he wasn't driving dangerously yet was still able to slot straight into his duplicitous don't-do-as-I-do mode for the waiting gutter press. Not the sort of friend anyone needs in my opinion.

He spent years in Brussels as Transport Commissioner presiding over the roll-out of the current cancer of europe-wide automatic taxation systems and later as Vice-President helping run one of the most corrupt gravy trains in history.

If he was ever going to speak out against injustice he would have done it by now. God knows he has helped create enough of it.

No thanks.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:30 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 19:43
Posts: 86
Rigpig wrote:
I believe that Mr Kinnocks case illustrates perfectly the two faces of the 'speeding' issue. He says he campaigns against speeding and yet is a serial speeder himself, obviously he is campaigning against other peoples speeding which is the killer, not his own.
Mr Kinnock is not alone of course, he sits alongside dozens of others:
    Local residents who arm themselves with speed cameras and then catch their neighbours
    Ministers for Transport
    Police officers
    Safety camera vans
    SafeSpeed hecklers
    Etc, etc
What a nonsense.


Yes, this is the main problem. Local residents witter about a speeding problem outside their house - but are perfectly happy to speed outside everyone else's house.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:59 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 01:48
Posts: 526
Location: Netherlands
stive gonzales wrote:
HalcyonRichard wrote:
Hi Paul,
This is the high profile type of friend we need. He is ripe for the message - he knows he wasn't driving dangerously and the inconvienience of the system. ( he's a politician hence the apology and remorse and no use of hardship - no days of press hounding ). A nice letter explaining the case against speed cameras and asking for more independant research might give you a friend in high places.

Regards

Richard


He knows he wasn't driving dangerously yet was still able to slot straight into his duplicitous don't-do-as-I-do mode for the waiting gutter press. Not the sort of friend anyone needs in my opinion.

He spent years in Brussels as Transport Commissioner presiding over the roll-out of the current cancer of europe-wide automatic taxation systems and later as Vice-President helping run one of the most corrupt gravy trains in history.

If he was ever going to speak out against injustice he would have done it by now. God knows he has helped create enough of it.

No thanks.

I tend to agree with HalcyonRichard, he could hardly publically say anything else without jeapordising his position.

But an appropriate approach from SafeSpeed would probably appeal to his privately-held feelings of injustice. Then perhaps subtley and intelligently he could use his influence to the benefit of real road safety - which means supporting the SafeSpeed cause.

Perhaps he could also have a "friendly" word with his fellow-Welshman Mr. Brunstrom over a pint of Brains SA, if they bump into each other at the Eisteddfod :drink: . All IMO of course.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 16:30
Posts: 57
Location: Swindon
hardly surprising that a polititian is seen as being hypocritical! Wonder how many more have been caught whilst going to/leaving Westminster? Is it any different to myself or countless others who commute to work daily?

Why should the solicitor point out that there were no other vehicles in the picture frame ~ TSM will tell you speeding is speeding and is punishable by the severest means available. SPEED = DEATH, if you speed you are a murderer. B*ll*cks.

Saying that, 5 times in 3 years, how unlucky is he!! :lol: :D

About time the polititians got a taste of their own medicine.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 13:25 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
I do genuinely feel sorry for the guy. I don't know him at all, but I cannot believe that he would have been driving in a dangerous manner. Therefore, just having been banned, I would think he is a prime candidate for SS to approach?

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 14:07 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:26
Posts: 194
Location: Burton on Trent
Hi Scamper good point. Its about 15% of the population have a speeding ticket so 15% of about 635 Means about 95 M.P.'s with at least one ticket. If the SCP's carry on they will be in the majority :lol:

:) Richard


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 131 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 1.227s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]