Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jun 03, 2026 03:35

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 298 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 17:55 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
President Gas wrote:
Quote:
Optimum conditions, if I'm in a hurry, about 70, yes.


Why do you need to go so fast?


I'm in a hurry!

President Gas wrote:
Don't you realise that if you drove slower you would have a shorter stopping distance and would be less likely to have an accident or less likely to be seriously injured if you did have an accident?


If I'm not in a hurry, that's what I do do.

President Gas wrote:
Why do you take this reckless, irresponsible approach to driving on the public roads? You should slow down to, say, 50mph as it would be much safer for you and those around you.


I do if I'm not in a hurry. It's a trade-off. If I am in a hurry I drive at 65 or even (gasp) more. Once, at at gig in Liverpool, the drummer forgot his symbols (!) and the other giutarist and I managed to get from downtown Liverpool to North Wales and back inside an hour, and that was through the tunnel. That's shifting, chum, but the show must go on.

The trick is not to be in a hurry by scheduling time well.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 17:58 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Gobserver

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 18:25 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:47
Posts: 920
Location: South Bucks
basingwerk wrote:
Gobserver

Not bad in the heckling stakes but otherwise rather ... inadequate.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 18:43 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Observer wrote:
Basingberk


basingwerk wrote:
Gobserver


Absolutely classic guys!

I'd just like to say earlier today I typed "Basingberk" entirely by accident, and was lucky to correct it before I sent it.

I hope no one's offended, and if this level of light hearted insult continues I won't intervene without a specific request. Seconds out...

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 18:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 17:46
Posts: 823
Location: Saltburn, N. Yorks
When Observer asked basingwerk/brunstrom to use the other half of his brain, he left out the word 'cell'! :o


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 19:20 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
In Gear wrote:
If there are road works - then I would certainly not drive at anything above 50mph


IG, this is a bit off-topic, but, speaking of roadworks, I'd like to run something past you.
On the M5 there are roadworks, although the only 'roadworks' are a few spots on the hard shoulder, where they've installed concrete barriers behind which the workers do their stuff. All three lanes are open, but they've seen fit to restrict several miles of motorway to 50mph, even though, as I've said, there are only a few places, spaced a couple of miles apart, where there's any roadworks going on - and they don't work at night or over the weekends.
They say that this 50mph limit is there to 'protect the workforce', but I can't see how. A car losing control at 70mph would probably simply bounce off the concrete barriers they have in place, but a HGV doing 50mph (only 6mph lower than their limited speed) will not be stopped by a few pieces of concrete. Additionally, the 50mph limit has the effect of bunching the traffic up, which makes an accident - and possible injury to the workforce - far more likely.
That's my take on it, but I'd value your opinion.

Quote:
- unless I had a call which demanded I put on the the old whoo-whoos, and flashing lights ... and floor it .....


Reminds me of a couple of years back - I was driving through roadworks, down to 2 lanes, 50 limit, when I saw blues and twos coming up behind me - fast. The left lane was nose-to-tail lorries so I couldn't pull over anytime soon, and my only option was to floor it - which I did. I got to 100mph+ before I spotted a space to pull into. As the copper passed me, he gave me a friendly wave - good thing he was one of the good guys :wink:

Quote:
Basingwerk - mate - they drive perfectly safely at 81.25 mph (and higher in some places) on continent and they do adhere to the 67mph maximum in poor weather conditions.


Tell me something else: what would you probably do if you saw someone on the motorway going well in excess of the limit but, in your opinion, driving perfectly safely for conditions?

Regards
Peter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 00:24 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
basingwerk wrote:
President Gas wrote:
1. A liar, 2. A menace on the roads


You forgot to call me a scoundrel!


You SCOUNDREL you! Then!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 00:32 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
JT wrote:
basingwerk wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
speed cameras are massively expensive. And don't give me that guff about the "offender pays". The total cost is taken out of society. People who pay 60 pound fines don't spend their 60 pounds in the High Street do they? We're looking at at least 120 million pounds sunk (i.e. actually spent) on cameras this year.


But surely the people who receive the 60 pound fines don’t burn the cash on a bonfire? ...

Well in effect yes they do, in that this collected resource is sunk into something that yields no tangible benefit.

To illustrate the point, what if we collected the equivalent of all the £60 fines but spent the resulting (say £160M) on something else that would deliver a tangible benefit, such as improving driver education.

The money IS wasted. It takes money to physically install a camera - that money is spent and can't now be spent on something else. We pay for the time of the staff that service them and send the tickets out, when we could alternatively pay people to do something useful. Whilst I agree that some proportion of money spent on anything must inevitably find find its way back into the economy, nevertheless most doesn't. Anything spent on something tangible (such as a yellow box by the side of the road) has effectively been spent once and for all.



Nail on head!

And it depreciates to zero immediately as well - another way I think they hide their ill gotten gains in their financial statements.

If the aim is to reduce casualties - then the investment is definitely not giving a return for the expenditure....

However, if the money is spent on education incentives, then one would see a return for the investment in better driving standards - from which a reduced accident rate would ensue.

Do you get the point Bustingwaterworks?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 00:48 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
bursting his waterworks to make a point and burping lots of hot air basingwerk wrote:
Yes, my friend in A&E is always telling me how the number of people who have fallen over their flamethrowers as they come down stairs in the morning holding a bag of kitchen knives is on the increase!


As a matter of fact they are ;)

My colleagues tell me a lot......

You would be amazed at how dangerous a Black & Decker workmate can be...... :roll: Someone arrived in casualty with a broken thumb from one of those ....

Another hammered a nail through his hand..... :roll:

Someone else broke all his fingers fitting a kitchen ......

Another appeared after scalding himself when his soup boiled over.... :roll:

Burns from cooking the family meal :roll:

Mouth burns from shovelling hot family meal into gob whilst watching Corrie :roll:

Colleague treated someone with scalded feet after getting into bath without running some cold water...... :roll:

Not to mention the deep cuts form use of stanley knives, burns from concrete, superglue problems, broken limbs from falling off step ladders, ordinary ladders, electric shocks from fixing wiring, using electric lawn mowers....and this is just the tip of the iceberg of cost to NHS from carelessness around the home.

Far in excess of RTA/C incidents........ which are not reducing in number at all - despite all the hype form the scamerati :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 00:58 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
SafeSpeed wrote:
Observer wrote:
Basingberk


basingwerk wrote:
Gobserver


Absolutely classic guys!

I'd just like to say earlier today I typed "Basingberk" entirely by accident, and was lucky to correct it before I sent it.

I hope no one's offended, and if this level of light hearted insult continues I won't intervene without a specific request. Seconds out...


I am sure Basingwerk and no-one else will not be offended by any of this gentle banter and leg pulling on nicknames. So long as it does not degenerate into sort of thing my wife experienced elsewhere. After all - we are gentlemen on this site :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 01:21 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
basingwerk wrote:
For example, the roads are not for fun, but for getting about on quickly and safely, but I sense that some posters here are sports car drivers put out by restrictions. To bad for them, but serious drivers don’t want speed kids attached to their bumpers!

I suspect the vast majority of us are serious drivers who are interested in getting from A to B quickly and safely. We are not "speed kids" - in fact that's not a meaningful term. Your average Saxo-driving chav is totally at a loss once out of the urban environment. Driving is a serious subject that is worth taking an interest in and developing one's ability.

Our motivation is not being "put out by restrictions" but being concerned that current trends in safety policy actually make the roads more dangerous.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 10:01 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Mad Moggie wrote:
bursting his waterworks to make a point and burping lots of hot air basingwerk wrote:
Yes, my friend in A&E is always telling me how the number of people who have fallen over their flamethrowers as they come down stairs in the morning holding a bag of kitchen knives is on the increase!


As a matter of fact they are ;)

My colleagues tell me a lot......

You would be amazed at how dangerous a Black & Decker workmate can be...... :roll: Someone arrived in casualty with a broken thumb from one of those ....

Another hammered a nail through his hand..... :roll:

Someone else broke all his fingers fitting a kitchen ......

Another appeared after scalding himself when his soup boiled over.... :roll:

Burns from cooking the family meal :roll:

Mouth burns from shovelling hot family meal into gob whilst watching Corrie :roll:

Colleague treated someone with scalded feet after getting into bath without running some cold water...... :roll:

Not to mention the deep cuts form use of stanley knives, burns from concrete, superglue problems, broken limbs from falling off step ladders, ordinary ladders, electric shocks from fixing wiring, using electric lawn mowers....and this is just the tip of the iceberg of cost to NHS from carelessness around the home.

Far in excess of RTA/C incidents........ which are not reducing in number at all - despite all the hype form the scamerati :roll:


My dad dropped an oven door on his foot whilst he was working in the kitchen...broke his toe :lol: The nurse in AE reception guffawed out loud when he told her what had happened. She made a new entry in her "Book of Silly Domestic Incidents" afterwards.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 10:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
PeterE wrote:
Your average Saxo-driving chav.....


HEY!! My wife drives a Saxo. And it's a VTS..., with chrome bits......

:D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 10:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 14:16
Posts: 109
BW

Quote:
I'm in a hurry!


Poor planning was it?


Quote:
I do if I'm not in a hurry. It's a trade-off. If I am in a hurry I drive at 65 or even (gasp) more. Once, at at gig in Liverpool, the drummer forgot his symbols (!) and the other giutarist and I managed to get from downtown Liverpool to North Wales and back inside an hour, and that was through the tunnel. That's shifting, chum, but the show must go on.


So if you're not in a hurry you drive at say, 50?


Quote:
The trick is not to be in a hurry by scheduling time well.


There are no "tricks" to driving safely.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 14:19 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
Pete317 wrote:
In Gear wrote:
If there are road works - then I would certainly not drive at anything above 50mph


IG, this is a bit off-topic, but, speaking of roadworks, I'd like to run something past you.
On the M5 there are roadworks, although the only 'roadworks' are a few spots on the hard shoulder, where they've installed concrete barriers behind which the workers do their stuff. All three lanes are open, but they've seen fit to restrict several miles of motorway to 50mph, even though, as I've said, there are only a few places, spaced a couple of miles apart, where there's any roadworks going on - and they don't work at night or over the weekends.
They say that this 50mph limit is there to 'protect the workforce', but I can't see how. A car losing control at 70mph would probably simply bounce off the concrete barriers they have in place, but a HGV doing 50mph (only 6mph lower than their limited speed) will not be stopped by a few pieces of concrete. Additionally, the 50mph limit has the effect of bunching the traffic up, which makes an accident - and possible injury to the workforce - far more likely.
That's my take on it, but I'd value your opinion.


Slip stream from fast moving traffic can be dangerous to them - especially if they are using drills - even behind the concrete barrier. Also - cranes, diggers, tippers would be somewhere around ....which is probably why the 50 mph stretches beyond the actual roadworks.

Bunching --- two second rule :wink: Gradual slow down to "correct" speed without slamming on anchors and keeping reasonable distance usually helps flow and prevents bunching - but again part of need for constant input into driver development - which can be done by series of decent tips on the telly. :wink:

But agree - Gatso could be switched off when risk is nil. But I would still be inclined to drive past the concrete slabs cautiously - especially if lanes had narrowed there a a result. :wink:


little ole me wrote:
Quote:
- unless I had a call which demanded I put on the the old whoo-whoos, and flashing lights ... and floor it .....


Reminds me of a couple of years back - I was driving through roadworks, down to 2 lanes, 50 limit, when I saw blues and twos coming up behind me - fast. The left lane was nose-to-tail lorries so I couldn't pull over anytime soon, and my only option was to floor it - which I did. I got to 100mph+ before I spotted a space to pull into. As the copper passed me, he gave me a friendly wave - good thing he was one of the good guys :wink:


Good job the PC Gatso was not there either :roll: :roll: But then - that is difference between proper policing and this sort of thing where your only option is to appeal and pray common sense prevails :roll:

little ole me wrote:
Quote:
Basingwerk - mate - they drive perfectly safely at 81.25 mph (and higher in some places) on continent and they do adhere to the 67mph maximum in poor weather conditions.


Tell me something else: what would you probably do if you saw someone on the motorway going well in excess of the limit but, in your opinion, driving perfectly safely for conditions?

Regards
Peter



ooh! :lol: That's a tough one!

Depends - how much above limit. Have been known to give acid lecture at 99 mph (was more - but what's a couple of mph bewteen pals) - chap was almost pickling himself in back of the car - he drove well - but fast.... Was at ca 5 a.m. on summer morning - no traffic apart from us at time..... guy hurtled past the sliproad where we were larking about - so we followed - as you do :lol: He was in right old panic as he thought he was looking at instant ban .... pointed out dangers of someone who might still be half asleep in front of him and so on .... and let him go on basis that it was new toy and he simply succumbed to temptation .....not a habitual speeder and certainly every indication was "safe" driver normally.

Lot of comments seen on other fora about tonning it at night....

Well.... reason why I would stop and probably issue proceedings against a "tonner" is ... night driving -= poor visibility = danger to self and others.

Basically Pete - I try to be as fair and as professional as I possibly can at all times. I do not rub salt in wounds nor try to make people feel small when I stop them either. That is not professional.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 18:03 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
Thanks for your comments, IG

In Gear wrote:
Slip stream from fast moving traffic can be dangerous to them - especially if they are using drills - even behind the concrete barrier. Also - cranes, diggers, tippers would be somewhere around ....which is probably why the 50 mph stretches beyond the actual roadworks.


But several miles past? And I seldom see workers at these sites, let alone cranes etc. I'm also a bit doubtful that a 70mph car in lane 2 or 3 would create as much slipstream as an artic in lane 1.

Quote:
Bunching --- two second rule :wink: Gradual slow down to "correct" speed without slamming on anchors and keeping reasonable distance usually helps flow and prevents bunching - but again part of need for constant input into driver development - which can be done by series of decent tips on the telly. :wink:


By bunching, I don't necessarily mean not observing the two-second rule, as much as vehicles being alongside one another for long periods of time. One of them just has to drift a metre or two over and you've got a nasty.

Quote:
ooh! :lol: That's a tough one!

Depends - how much above limit. Have been known to give acid lecture at 99 mph (was more - but what's a couple of mph bewteen pals) - chap was almost pickling himself in back of the car - he drove well - but fast.... Was at ca 5 a.m. on summer morning - no traffic apart from us at time..... guy hurtled past the sliproad where we were larking about - so we followed - as you do :lol: He was in right old panic as he thought he was looking at instant ban .... pointed out dangers of someone who might still be half asleep in front of him and so on .... and let him go on basis that it was new toy and he simply succumbed to temptation .....not a habitual speeder and certainly every indication was "safe" driver normally.

Lot of comments seen on other fora about tonning it at night....

Well.... reason why I would stop and probably issue proceedings against a "tonner" is ... night driving -= poor visibility = danger to self and others.

Basically Pete - I try to be as fair and as professional as I possibly can at all times. I do not rub salt in wounds nor try to make people feel small when I stop them either. That is not professional.


You're professional, decent and fair-minded - just how it should be (Brundstrom, take note)

I can't describe what a weird sensation it was for me to be doing 120mph, while being passed by a big Merc going much faster - all in full view of a patrol car, whose driver didn't bat an eyelid.
This, of course, happened in Germany.

Regards
Peter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 00:02 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Rigpig wrote:
My dad dropped an oven door on his foot whilst he was working in the kitchen...broke his toe :lol: The nurse in AE reception guffawed out loud when he told her what had happened. She made a new entry in her "Book of Silly Domestic Incidents" afterwards.


Shortly after we married - my wife was hanging up curtains in the smallest room in the house.... only she forgot to put lid down on the toilet..

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Yup - you guessed - she slipped and her foot went right down the bend ....

Arrived home - she had been stuck there for hours by then :lol:

Tried soap, and all sorts of things to get her out of there.... eventually called both a plumber and the fire brigade - well - did not know what else to do .....

They arrived - took one look - and fell about laughing.... :lol: :lol:

We got her out of the toilet eventually ..... but we had to remove the toilet to do so ....

Was one expensive accident ... :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 00:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Mad Moggie wrote:
Shortly after we married - my wife was hanging up curtains in the smallest room in the house.... only she forgot to put lid down on the toilet..
ROTFL - tell her that's supposed to be us men. Image

Mad Moggie wrote:
Yup - you guessed - she slipped and her foot went right down the bend ....
Yeah, my dad did something similar when fixing a louvre window behind the loo. To his credit he did remeber to put the seat down. 10 out of 10 for that. Minus about five hundred points for forgetting that he weighed about 15 stone and the toilet seat was one of those thin plastic efforts that bend when the cat sits on it. :lol: Similar results, but didn't get stuck. And he's still living it down nearly 20 years later. (We're a mean lot).

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 07:58 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
Gatsobait wrote:
Yeah, my dad did something similar when fixing a louvre window behind the loo.


Same thing happened to my mate in Paris - he was fixing a loo window behind the Louvre. :)

Sorry, couldn't resist...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 09:23 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
President Gas wrote:
So if you're not in a hurry you drive at say, 50?



50 is a good speed sometimes. If I'm in a real hurry, I drive at the maximum speed I can safely, within the limit. If I'm in no hurry at all, I don't go anywhere! And if it is in between, I drive at somewhere less than or equal to the maximum speed I can safely, within the limit, but higher than the speed where I would annoy people! Whether that is 20, 30,40,50, or 60 or even (gasp) 70, depends on those conditions.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 298 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.061s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]