Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jun 14, 2026 16:39

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 03:17 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
Ziltro wrote:
Gatsos at night are more or less invisible (or, don't look important/blend in to background) uneless they are reflective. I know of only three reflective ones arount here, all in highly visible places anyway. Ones by trees and lots of signs? Not reflective.


And even the reflective ones can easily be lost in the brightly lit visual clutter on many urban roads after sunset. Ever tried to spot a gatso right next to a Jet garage, for example? Yellow reflective paint on camera against a background of the bright yellow illuminated signs of the garage makes pretty good camouflage...

In general, there are some urban roads on which I'm amazed any driver is able to pick out the reflected or emmited light from things that directly concern them (e.g. traffic lights) given the sheer number of non road-related lights, and their encroachment into the visual envelope of the road ahead.


I've also noticed an increasing number of reflective yellow-backed square roadsigns going up, which from anything more than a few 10's of metres at night, when caught in your headlights, look uncomfortably similar to Gatsos-same shape, roughly the same size and height, and only when you get close enough to notice the text on the sign, or realise that it's just a flat plate rather than a box, can you relax.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 17:10 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Twister wrote:
In general, there are some urban roads on which I'm amazed any driver is able to pick out the reflected or emmited light from things that directly concern them (e.g. traffic lights) given the sheer number of non road-related lights, and their encroachment into the visual envelope of the road ahead.

Oh that sounds like London whee they have some really wide roads with shops (with all their lights) and lots of pedestrian crossings without the white reflective border so they don't even look like traffic lights!

Twister wrote:
I've also noticed an increasing number of reflective yellow-backed square roadsigns going up

Oh yes... I remember seeing a yellow "for sale" sign up high on a hedge, if I'd remembered the name of the company I might well have complained at it's positioning because it looked very much like a camera!
At least the partnerships would never use these signs to hide cameras behind...
http://www.dorsetsafetycameras.org.uk/images/insets/inset1.jpg

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 20:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
Ziltro wrote:
Twister wrote:
In general, there are some urban roads on which I'm amazed any driver is able to pick out the reflected or emmited light from things that directly concern them (e.g. traffic lights) given the sheer number of non road-related lights, and their encroachment into the visual envelope of the road ahead.

Oh that sounds like London


I was thinking of the stretch of Green Lanes between Manor House and Turnpike Lane when I wrote that :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Brake!
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 08:00 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:03
Posts: 73
Location: Leicestershire
Brake!

People automatically brake when they see a revenue raiser (Speed Trap) why? May be because the speed limits are constantly changed and it has been proven that there is a driver overload due to confusing signs and unapproved speed limit signs.
As for Mr camera operator person, I will expect to see you soon on the horlicks TV advert soon.
(How dos he sleep at night)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brake!
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 19:36 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
Dead slow wrote:
Brake!

People automatically brake when they see a revenue raiser (Speed Trap) why? May be because the speed limits are constantly changed and it has been proven that there is a driver overload due to confusing signs and unapproved speed limit signs.
As for Mr camera operator person, I will expect to see you soon on the horlicks TV advert soon.
(How dos he sleep at night)


well i dont brake for any camera within my force area or elsewhere

how do i sleep at night - get undressed, go to bed close my eyes snuggle up to the wife if its her night off, and count cars til i go to the land of nod, pretty easy really, thanks for the concern though

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brake!
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 20:22 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Dead slow wrote:
Brake! (How dos he sleep at night)

Driving within the unnaturally low speed limit on an empty motorway usually does it for me :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 20:34 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
IMO motorways and duals need to be addressed in a different context from 30mph areas

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 03:21 
Offline
Police Officer
Police Officer

Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 22:37
Posts: 279
Location: Warrington
Cameras dont cause collisions, speeding in attentive motorists do stick to a reasonable speed limit and when you see one all you will have to do is use accelaration sense knocking off a couple of mph not slamming the brakes on and causing a massive pile up, then saying it wasnt my fault there was a camera over there.
Stephen


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:05 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 10:42
Posts: 155
It's fantastic just how far from the point this discussion has strayed. While possibly interesting to know, the reason why people brake for cameras is surely not the point, it would seem that they do, and anecdotal evidence from the OP suggests that that act of braking, allied with the general numptie's tendency to tailgate is causing accidents. Accidents that would not be happening if the cameras weren't there. That surely is the point, it's all very well bemoaning the driving skills of the people who do it, and indeed the standard of the average driver in this country could be improved, but at the end of the day we currently have the driving population that we have, and it would appear that the presence of cameras is causing these chumps to have prangs that they otherwise would not be having - so how does that aid road safety?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 01:43 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
I would guess that these people who are braking for cameras are those on 9 points like me. When you're one flash away from losing your licence and your job, priorities tend to shift a little.

If I see a Talivan or hand-held laser, I apply the brakes immediately. I have trained myself to do this instinctively, to the point where I can respond in a fraction of a second. Once you're in visual range of an LTI20/20, the 2 seconds it takes to remember the speed limit, check your speedo and consciously work out whether you need to brake or not is 1.5 seconds more than they need to ping you.

Since conscious thought has been removed from the operation, it obviously means that a lot of the time I'm braking even when I'm not above the limit. Sometimes I even brake for innocent contractor's vans.

However, it beats losing my licence and my livelihood for that one occasion I AM doing 36 rather than 33.

The problem is that with the vans or hand-held laser, you don't know where the enforcement point is. There is no indicative line in the road like there is for GATSOs & TRUVELOs. They could be snapping cars 50m away or 500m away, you just don't know. In the absence of this information you have to assume you're "on the line" as soon as you see them. Speedo checks and slowing down gradually are two luxuries you can't afford.

Police forces bragging about new hand held laser guns that can zap cars 2km away etc. just adds to the paranoia.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 13:56 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
Stephen wrote:
Cameras dont cause collisions, speeding in attentive motorists do stick to a reasonable speed limit and when you see one all you will have to do is use accelaration sense knocking off a couple of mph not slamming the brakes on and causing a massive pile up, then saying it wasnt my fault there was a camera over there.
Stephen


What! Sorry couldn't make sense of this post.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:55 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 19:12
Posts: 21
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/4779632.stm

Crash right next to mobile scammer.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 21:45 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
mpaton2004 wrote:
I agree with CO, the only possible reasons people brake at fixed camera sites is:

a) They aren't aware of what their speed is.
b) They are going too fast and are likely to be prosecuted if they don't slow down.

When I am passing a fixed camera site I let engine braking take me down to the required speed if I am over well in advance. I see other drivers who are obviously miles away, see the camera, and slam the brakes on automatically.

The cause is a simple lack of observation and awareness and unfortunately one that will never be addressed in current policy.


So its ok to go over the speed limit as long as you have presence of mind to use engine braking to slow down for the camera!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 21:53 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
Regardless of whether or not a driver is going above a posted limit, if the net result of a grey box at the side of the road is that one or more drivers are distracted, or brake, (rightly or wrongly), then the grey boxes are the problem. NOT the act of exceeding or possibly only believing that you may be exceeding a number on a lollipop.

Given that ridiculous limits are often placed on perfecty good stretches of A road and dual carriage ways, its hardly suprising for drivers in unfamiliar ares to suddenly get all defensive about losing there license.

I along with most reasonable drivers could quite safely drive from Lands end to John o Groats in a spirited manner without the use of a speedo. Only speed enforcement makes it impossible to do, aand not any risk to life or limb.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.031s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]