Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 13:05

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 19:48 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 08:49
Posts: 400
fatboytim wrote:
Quote:
Brookwood, hey! just follow the pack don't worry about us we just work there.


I have every sympathy for anybody who has to try to repair our overcrowded and overused roads.

I never worked on the roads but occasionally got involved in Bridge jobs that involved working on the railway. Their safety precautions were excellant and there was no problem with trains speeding past. So while the danger was more we felt safer because it was more regimented.

_________________
Shooting is good for you and too good for some people.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: 400
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 19:53 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 00:31
Posts: 393
As I mentioned in an earlier post escorts /convoys do work well but are pretty frustrating for drivers. This is my second choice for safety after closing the road completely
fatboytim


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 400
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 20:07 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
fatboytim wrote:
... I'm sorry if you think, asking someone to look at the issue from other guys position/perspective is "crap".


That's a misread of my intention and I apologise unreservedly for any part that I played in the misunderstanding.

I'm just trying to focus the debate on the important issues. I'd much rather we dealt with facts, analysis and science than feelings and emotions. And the bottom line is that you can't save lives with appeal to emotions.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 20:09 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
Is it my imagination or has a new pack of wolves formed prowling around to work out which part of FBT to attack?

L plate remember? "dangerous crap"? Sorry if I'm out of order here. Yes we want to find the right safety message, but for many reasons we've come to realise that the balance of driving is far more heavily weighted to psychology rather than physics. Fear is in both camps. when unfounded (as PS suggests) it is solely in the psychology domain. However, when founded it is in both.

Just my 2d.

As for why FBT's software is crashing... No idea, sorry. Never had that with phpbb before.

Edit: ooops - L plate's gone, FBT has hit 10 :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 20:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Brookwood wrote:
fatboytim wrote:
Quote:
Brookwood, hey! just follow the pack don't worry about us we just work there.


I have every sympathy for anybody who has to try to repair our overcrowded and overused roads.

I never worked on the roads but occasionally got involved in Bridge jobs that involved working on the railway. Their safety precautions were excellant and there was no problem with trains speeding past. So while the danger was more we felt safer because it was more regimented.

Now the system employed on rail might be a good example to be employed on road - Network rail run their safety courses and all working on either the equivalent of roadworks or closed must have a safety card, showing that they have passed a mimimum safety course [b] - no card - no work .Also this card has to be renewed every few years - to update on hazards etc .Any additional safety skills are retested and assessed yearly .

Mind you - trains don't swerve / change lane but on live line do travel at up to 125, and at 1 mile every 30 s how can you tell which line they're on

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 20:20 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Roger wrote:
Is it my imagination or has a new pack of wolves formed prowling around to work out which part of FBT to attack?


I hope not.

I think maybe I contributed to a misunderstanding with a 'sub optimal' choice of words which I regret and for which I have already apologised.

Roger wrote:
L plate remember? "dangerous crap"? Sorry if I'm out of order here.


Yeah. Those words. You're not out of order.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 20:20 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Roger wrote:
As for why FBT's software is crashing... No idea, sorry. Never had that with phpbb before.


If he has to keep on rebooting, sounds like a virus to me.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: 400
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 21:19 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 00:31
Posts: 393
I realise that on this site I am 'preaching to the converted'
But out there I have to deal with actions of the inconsiderate, the 40 thru the nsl and thru the village type, mobile phone one hand drivers, high speeders up to the taper and cut in type, apart from the downright criminal ( no tax, ins, mot or licence) as do you all. Do YOU trust their ability or psychology.
Cameras obviously don't work in this situation or 400 wouldn't have been scammed.
Driver education and proper pull over wag the finger policing,

fatboytim

Now if fines were spent exclusivly on education and information (maybe like the signs PS talks about in the roadworker thread).. sorry just thinking...please dont respond to this last comment as I don't have a reasoned arguement to support it, and as a new member, I think I've upset enough existing members for now(not my intention).

SORRY ALL I honestly didn't mean to hijack this thread.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 400
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 21:22 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
fatboytim wrote:
SORRY ALL I honestly didn't mean to hijack this thread.


No, really, don't be sorry. Your contributions are more (much more) than welcome.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 23:52 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Have a great deal of sympathy with fatboytim, but am stumped as to a solution.

We have the CSCS card (general safety) in the construction industry and many contractors are running no card no job, so we have trained competant persons on site (most of the time) but on the fragile site boundary we joe public....

In H&S we use ERICPD as a heirachy of controls

E - Elimination of the risk entirely, we can't eliminate road maintenance or repair.

R - Reduce exposure - Normally a control measure for chemicals, not really relevant as how do you reduce exposure for a roadworker, use twice as many working for half the time ?

I - Isolation from danger(ous substance) - Lots of long term road works use double cones, am surprised that concrete barriers are not used as much as they could be, used a great deal in the states and NZ to great effect, FBT what are the downfalls of using these ? Cost? Any effect on road that needs to be remiediated etc ? Or just tradition (have heard many time we've always done it this way) ?

C - Control measures - Safe systems of works, method statements, permits to work etc, good but again placeing it squarely on contractors head, what about drivers, it's almost like a chemical worker, processing a volatile chemical, whilst a member of the public wanders past smoking, the worker might be doing all the right things but who can rely on joe public not to do something monumentally dum ? The one thing that I suppose could fall into this is the convey vehicles.

P - PPE - Personal Protective Equipment, if anyone does a hard hat that will protect me from a 44ft truck, please let me know !

D - Discipline, this is where cameras and trafpol come in, at one time (long before my time) HA used to let trafpol know works are going on and there used to be a presence, now conspicuous by thier absence. They were an effective deterrent and could act immediately. Cameras delayed response, positioned poorly, near Chelmsford the A12 is being worked on cameras through the works, but two at the end of the works past the cones before NSL signs, seem to be placed to catch drivers getting back up to speed.

To me it seems that we should have more trafpol out at works may not seem sexy or cutting edge but if people knew that a copper was on hand would they be more carefull at road works (and I don't just mean more slowly).

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 00:44 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
SafeSpeed wrote:
Brookwood wrote:
I agree there are sometimes long stretches with apparently nothing going on but who's to say that tomorrow will be the same?


This is where the authorities have a real duty not to 'cry wolf'. We (national we) have to get far better at giving accurate information.

Recent works on the A590 were well signed, well publicised, and suspended at peak times - This worked to the benefit of drivers and workers alike.
Admittedly the work (replacing catseyes in a set of narrow tight bends) allowed for stop/start at short notice, but at least it showed the regime to be desirable, AND effective.

The French model is to get the job done as quickly as possible. To this end, a stretch of road will be worked on over a long distance, with multiple start points, and large numbers of men, materials and vehicles, and work is completed very quickly.
On single carriageway roads, it will often be shut for three to five days (depending on the work being done) and the job finished in good time using the above technique)

Are these barriers of any use? They are used widely in France rather than just cones.
Image

Their advanced warnings are extensive too, and always seem in better order than ones you see here. These preceded a closure of lane 2 for crash barrier repairs.
Image
The biggest difference is that drivers take heed of the warnings, and pull over in good time, and slow appropriately. I dont recall seeing a temporary limit, although they may be implied in similar manner to town/village name signs colour coded, indicating the speed limit.

FatBoyTim wrote:
We do not spend all day looking for these drivers we actually do do some work (contrary to some posters impressions).
:lol: :lol:
I dont recall anyone saying you dont do any work, only that in some roadworks, you go home at night, and some PRAT leaves a GATSO or SPECS camera running!!

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 400
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 00:56 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
fatboytim wrote:
But out there I have to deal with actions of the inconsiderate, the 40 thru the nsl and thru the village type, mobile phone one hand drivers, high speeders up to the taper and cut in type, apart from the downright criminal ( no tax, ins, mot or licence) as do you all. Do YOU trust their ability or psychology.


At the bottom of the driver quality scale here are a lot of risky behaviours, but we're really talking about the worst 5% or 10% at most. This group have all sorts of bad behaviour; drunk, reckless, careless, sleepy, inattentive and so on. The only option, if we want to deal with them is effective roads policing.

But the other 90%+, most of us, need good information and encouragement. We'd respond to carrots better than sticks. we don't want to crash and we'll use experience to make a fair fist of not crashing most of the time.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 01:24 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 01:48
Posts: 526
Location: Netherlands
Good thread.
Excellent comments.
FatBoyTim, welcome, I like your attitude and appreciate your evident mature professionalty.

I'm no expert on the regulations or behind-the-scenes procedures and work practices, but I would like to add some constructive suggestions (Paul was, I believe, encouraging some dialogue on workable improvements).
Earnest contributed a very good post about barriers and warnings in France, good stuff, I think that this is a good avenue to explore. Someone else (sorry, forgot who :( ) referred to the French arranging things to get the job done "quick-in, quick-out", also a sensible approach IMO.

While I think that the Dutch are often very slow in executing their major motorway work, I do also regularly see "quick-in, quick-out" work taking place here late at night, and these jobs (e.g. crash barrier stuff and some resurfacing I have noticed) are definitely planned to cause minimal impact to the normal road users - i.e. all lanes are usually open again before the next day's rush hour starts. Not very nice to come across a traffic jam on the motorway at 01:00 in the morning when driving back from visiting friends admittedly, but this is of course far better than closing off the lanes during daytime.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 03:41 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I believe someone thought that road workers were doing one of the most risky jobs available. I've been googling for real data on this and so far have found this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2195847.stm

Most dangerous jobs

1. Fishermen
2. Merchant seafarers
3. Aircraft flight deck officers
4. Railway lengthmen
5. Scaffolders
6. Roofers and glaziers
7. Forestry workers
8. Quarry and other mine workers
9. Dockers and stevedores
10. Lorry drivers

If anyone has better data (more recent or more detail) please post it up.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 04:20 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr139.pdf is interesting background information.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 05:27 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Roger wrote:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr139.pdf is interesting background information.


With no population or risk values it's of limited value in the context of this thread.

It does tell us that 11 road workers died out of ~1,000 reports, but without having some idea of how many roadworkers were employed relative to other groups we can make no judgement about relative safety.

And it does not distinguish between road workers killed by traffic and those killed in the normal course of their work. My guess is that most of the deaths were due to their usual work.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:25 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
SafeSpeed wrote:
Roger wrote:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr139.pdf is interesting background information.


With no population or risk values it's of limited value in the context of this thread.

It does tell us that 11 road workers died out of ~1,000 reports, but without having some idea of how many roadworkers were employed relative to other groups we can make no judgement about relative safety.

And it does not distinguish between road workers killed by traffic and those killed in the normal course of their work. My guess is that most of the deaths were due to their usual work.


Rereading it I would agree.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:20 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
supertramp wrote:
Good thread.
Excellent comments.
FatBoyTim, welcome, I like your attitude and appreciate your evident mature professionalty.

I'm no expert on the regulations or behind-the-scenes procedures and work practices, but I would like to add some constructive suggestions (Paul was, I believe, encouraging some dialogue on workable improvements).
Earnest contributed a very good post about barriers and warnings in France, good stuff, I think that this is a good avenue to explore. Someone else (sorry, forgot who :( ) referred to the French arranging things to get the job done "quick-in, quick-out", also a sensible approach IMO.

While I think that the Dutch are often very slow in executing their major motorway work, I do also regularly see "quick-in, quick-out" work taking place here late at night, and these jobs (e.g. crash barrier stuff and some resurfacing I have noticed) are definitely planned to cause minimal impact to the normal road users - i.e. all lanes are usually open again before the next day's rush hour starts. Not very nice to come across a traffic jam on the motorway at 01:00 in the morning when driving back from visiting friends admittedly, but this is of course far better than closing off the lanes during daytime.

I think what is most obvious to me is not the way that the French put up barriers, and get things done quickly, but the attitude of the people as a whole.
Drivers simply seem to show more respect towards road workers, and the work being carried out.
It's as if they can see the rewards at the end of the day!
Those pictures I put up were taken in December 2003. Work on the service area and slip road which was the reason for the barriers were not evident in August of the same year - including the footbridge!

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 17:29 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Given that we do everything on the roads to a shoestring budget, and we are in some places 12 years behind on 'routine maintenance I doubt if the same could be said here.'

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 17:52 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Safety Engineer wrote:
Given that we do everything on the roads to a shoestring budget, and we are in some places 12 years behind on 'routine maintenance I doubt if the same could be said here.'


Even that is a 'cultural influence'. The low priority given to roads maintenence and roads development is due to beliefs that 'cars are bad'.

So it's just one way that the wrong culture damages road safety.

I don't think 'cars are bad', but obviously it's a matter of opinion. However, irrespective of what anyone thinks about cars we still have to live with them for the forseable future and we should make appropriate efforts to live with them as safely as reasonably possible.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.194s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]