Gatsobait wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
It's the DfT guidelines that are supposed to result in claim back suspension on a by site basis.
Sorry, can I just make sure I'm clear on this. If I see a Talivan hiding in the bushes or something and write in to say that they weren't following the rules, the partnership loses the ability to claim back all the fines it made from that site? Is it just that period of operation/shift/whatever or every time they've used that site? Or is it retrospective (ie would they have to get money out of the tea kitty to give back to the govt)? Are they allowed to ignore any complaints unless there's some solid evidence? (Folks - disposal cameras are so cheap there's no excuse for not keeping one in the car for just this sort of thing
)
Basically, could we please have a Duffer's Guide somewhere (as a sticky perhaps) for catching SCPs out on the guidelines and stuffing up some of their revenue.
Although there are certain attractions, it isn't Safe Speed policy to launch such attacks. The risk is that we would blur our position as a road safety campaign.
However, the forums are here and if anyone wants to make up a guide we can certainly have it as a sticky.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Members
