Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Jun 04, 2026 09:08

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 06:40 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1750804,00.html

Quote:
POLICE are to be given new guidelines on using mobile speed cameras because of concerns that they are breaking the law by trapping motorists at too great a distance.
Laser cameras, which can either be handheld or mounted in vans, are certified by the Home Office for use at a range of up to 1,000 metres (3,281ft).



But the law states that a camera operator must be able to form a “prior opinion” that a vehicle is breaking the limit before using the camera to record its speed. The law dates from the days before radar speed guns when all that was needed to convict a driver of speeding was the opinion of two officers.

The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) is concerned that some officers and civilian operators may be ignoring the law and firing their lasers at random.

Camera partnerships, which include police and local authorities, are increasingly using mobile cameras instead of fixed cameras because the rules on deploying them are less stringent. A mobile camera can be used on any stretch of road where there have been two or more serious crashes in the previous three years. A fixed camera can be installed only after a fourth serious crash.

Partnerships are also finding that their income is dropping from fixed cameras because they have been painted yellow and are easy to spot. Motorists slow down for a hundred yards and then speed up again.

Mobile cameras usually catch drivers before they have even spotted the officer standing by the road or the camera van. There is no flash and the first time many motorists realise they have been caught is when they receive a penalty notice in the post.

The Department for Transport requires camera operators to be visible from 100 metres, but admits that motorists may be caught outside this range. Several motorists caught by mobile cameras are fighting their penalties on the ground that they were detected so far away that it would have been impossible for anyone to have formed an opinion they were speeding.

Richard Cleary, 45, was allegedly caught doing 70mph on a 60mph road in Wiltshire. He requested a video from the camera partnership which showed the speed recording was made when he was 728 metres from the camera van. He revisited the site and claims that even someone with perfect eyesight could not have told the difference between 60mph and 70mph. His case has been adjourned to allow some technical issues to be clarified.

Ian Bell, ACPO’s speed camera liaison officer, said that the guidelines were being reviewed because of concerns that they were unclear. “It was felt that during the revision of ACPO’s manual it might be necessary to emphasise the need to have a prior opinion that the driver was speeding,” he said.

Mr Bell said that there were no written rules on the distance at which it would be deemed reasonably possible to form an opinion. “The operator has to be able to say that he could visually tell that the vehicle was speeding, but the distance depends on the site. From a motorway bridge, the distance could be 400 to 600 metres. But in a congested area it could be only 100 metres.”

Paul Smith, founder of Safe Speed, the anti-camera campaign, said: “The system operates on the principle that people will simply pay the fixed penalty without challenging them or studying the rules. The system would grind to a halt if everyone with a legitimate case took it to court.”



Yet again it takes a member of the public to learn the law and find out that the police are ignoring their own rules. And they wonder why we hate camera enforcement so much.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 21:06 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
does


Last edited by camera operator on Sat Sep 23, 2006 18:13, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 13:59 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
How clear can the photos possibly be at that sort of range? Or do they take the speed reading, then wait for the target to get closer before snapping?

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 14:03 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
I know guys that have been busted for 36 in a 30 limit on a mobile camera.

I would love to know who can tell that the car is speeding from any range.. :x

45 to 50 yes.......but 36, I think not.

Presumably the operators are tested to see if they are able to make the judgement.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 17:36 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 18:16
Posts: 23
Location: Reading
Gizmo wrote:
I know guys that have been busted for 36 in a 30 limit on a mobile camera.

I would love to know who can tell that the car is speeding from any range.. :x

45 to 50 yes.......but 36, I think not.

Presumably the operators are tested to see if they are able to make the judgement.
Perhaps someone should test this in court... :judge:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 19:41 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
i


Last edited by camera operator on Sat Sep 23, 2006 18:24, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 19:46 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
camera operator wrote:
typical day after set up / checks / etc i'd say it takes about 15 / 20 logs to familiarise myself with the traffic flow after that i'd say probaly 2 logs every couple of minutes. on average after a typical 2.5 hours visit i would have about 90 logs onthe tape


When you say 'logs' does that mean prosecutable offences? Can you say how many prosecution starts that would cause?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 20:04 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
camera operator wrote:
i think you will find that it is the trigger is pulled if the operator thinks the vehicle is traveling at excess speed. the camera then confirms the view


I've seen photos taken as a car comes into view over the crest of a hill. How can the operator form an opinion of the vehicle's speed before he's actually seen the vehicle?

I'm not saying that you do this, but it does happen.

Cheers
Peter

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.023s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]