camera operator wrote:
are you on a flood plain tone
Not that I’m aware of CO. I’m about 500 ft above sea level with nothing to run down hill at me.
malcolmw wrote:
Do you have any problem with "travellers" round your way?
Not at all Malcolm. It’s not the sort of place, or space, where anyone would want or need to get a vehicle on it.
Mole wrote:
This is a complete guess, but a civil engineer once told me that kerbs can have a vital role to play on some roads, depending on the subsoil. Because tar is (essentially) a liquid, very heavy trucks, especially in hot weather, can displace it downwards and outwards. The kerb stones help to contain it - preventing it from moving sideways and sinking. No idea whether its true or not but it had a ring of tuth to it. That might explain the very solid foundations?
You may have just hit on it Mole! It’s never been a problem that I know of but to the left of my previous pictures there is a busy main road elevated, at a guess, two or three feet higher. Maybe a bit more, it's deceptive. Here’s another picture of it from the opposite direction. The heavy traffic is to the right this time on a NSL.

There are trees along the entire length which I would have though would act like a barrier and, like I say, there’s never been a problem with subsidence. (My 'before' picture). But even if that is the reason, nothing’s happening fast for certain and with money being tight it still seems like a terribly low priority to me for such an outlay.
If you are right Mole, for some reason they have continued all the way up beyond that picture where the roads are on the same level, but your explanation seems the most logical so far.

This is almost a game of lateral thinking now. If I have to I'll phone the Council and find out; it's driving me nuts. I thought someone might come on and say "oh they did it by me too and it's because of xyz" Bit of a head scratcher..