Quote:
A LIFE spent riding motorcycles has proven to me that MOST indications are WRONG...
How many of you indicate to pull out and pass a stationary vehicle, when you didn't have to slow or stop for it ?
Yet that has not been necessary for years now,.......
Firstly, I would hope that your statement that, "MOST indications are wrong", is an exaggeration or the standard of driving in your part of the world is abysmally worse than anywhere else that I have yet to experience. I agree that a large percentage don't indicate when they should but the number of people who indicate left when they mean right or indicate far too early or late are in the minority.
Your second statement,...."How many of you indicate to pull out and pass a stationary vehicle, when you didn't have to slow or stop for it ?
Yet that has not been necessary for years now,.......",
I presume you mean that it hasn't been taught for years but the statement that it has not been NECESSARY for years, is truly debateable. I would like to think that if I was driving a large vehicle with a motorcycle close behind me and I had to overtake a skip, for instance, that the motorcyclist would appreciate some sort of warning that they may encounter something very large and heavy, that they would not have been able to see through me, and not have it sprung upon them suddenly. Just because something is deemed "not necessary" in the driving test or lessons anymore is not necessarily a good idea. Just as the IAMs idea of not indicating all the time may be the done thing to them, doesn't always make for good road manners or good safety procedure in my eyes.
Hand signals for the test died out years ago, I believe, but I can still think of a few instances where using them helps emphasise a potentially hazardous situation.