Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jun 14, 2026 16:52

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 22:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
weepej wrote:
Pete317 wrote:
Just for starters, you cannot make a road safer by making it more dangerous.


Sorry, I have to repeat myself again.

How exactly can a road be dangerous? It's a piece of tarmac that sits there doing nothing.
How can a numerical speed sign dictate what is dangerous?

It's just a sign that sits there doing nothing WEEPEJ?

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 23:16 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
weepej wrote:
Mole wrote:
What we need to do is fill our roads with inconsistent and confusing messages that we don't need and serve no useful purpose...

Hmm, if by "inconsistent and confusing messages" you mean two large red circles with a big three zero in them either side of the carriageway then I'd seriously suggest you talk to somebody about your cognitive abilities!

Then perhaps you need to review your own cognitive abilities. We were talking about the reasonableness (or lack thereof) of speed limits for given roads.

weepej wrote:
Pete317 wrote:
Just for starters, you cannot make a road safer by making it more dangerous.


Sorry, I have to repeat myself again.

How exactly can a road be dangerous? It's a piece of tarmac that sits there doing nothing.

Looks like we'll have to repeat ourselves again!
Answer: unreasonable regulations that foster frustration and encourage unpredictable behaviour - the "inconsistent & confusing 'messages'" we are talking about.
But alas, for some people, the number in a roundel is all that matters, regardless of how unreasonable it is!

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 01:48 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
When they reduce the speed to the 'average' of a road than consider the 'true' 85th percentile, they skew and throw away all the thorough research that has been carried out for decades, that gave us the safest roads in the World. Why do that ?
We know that the safest drivers are around the 85th - 90th percentile areas, so isn't making the motorist safer the aim?
When is it ever right to drive at an inappropriate speed, perhaps 10mph at 'school leaving time' for example.
We need motorists to assess & judge correctly, then manage the risk well and appropriately - as much as is humanly possible.
So what if you took your bike to Richmond Park - would you go over the 20mph limit? How might you know if you don't have a cycle computer ?
Were you 'dangerous' if you strayed over that posted limit? Are those that are doing so, 'dangerous' or 'just' illegal?

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 07:08 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
How exactly can a road be dangerous? It's a piece of tarmac that sits there doing nothing.



If all roads are the same and not dangerous, then why do we need differing speed limits on them?

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 07:15 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Pete317 wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
If the officials wanted to make driving so unpleasant there are much simpler and cheaper ways of doing so than putting in speed limits.


But probably not without being seen to be doing something which might cost them votes. At least with speed limits, they can hide behind both the 'safety' facade and local council responsibility - given to them by the govt.


So you are saying that speed limits are a 'vote winner'. Something that is popular with the majority of people. Now, there are a lot of complaints on these forums that the government doesn't pay attention to what the majority wants....

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 09:14 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
dcbwhaley wrote:
Pete317 wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
If the officials wanted to make driving so unpleasant there are much simpler and cheaper ways of doing so than putting in speed limits.


But probably not without being seen to be doing something which might cost them votes. At least with speed limits, they can hide behind both the 'safety' facade and local council responsibility - given to them by the govt.


So you are saying that speed limits are a 'vote winner'. Something that is popular with the majority of people. Now, there are a lot of complaints on these forums that the government doesn't pay attention to what the majority wants....

But they’re not asking what the majority wants and they’re not asking people who really know what is and isn't dangerous :x

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 09:38 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
dcbwhaley wrote:
Pete317 wrote:
But probably not without being seen to be doing something which might cost them votes. At least with speed limits, they can hide behind both the 'safety' facade and local council responsibility - given to them by the govt.


So you are saying that speed limits are a 'vote winner'.

I don’t think so.
There is a gulf of difference between disguising something that otherwise would have lost votes, and openly promoting something that wins votes.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 19:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
graball wrote:
If all roads are the same and not dangerous, then why do we need differing speed limits on them?



Because some people would drive dangerously fast otherwise?

A road ain't dangerous until somebody drives dangerously on it surely?

Is a tightrope across a canyon dangerous before somebody starts walking on it?

Is a gun dangerous before somebody starts waving it around?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 19:52 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
weepej wrote:
How exactly can a road be dangerous? It's a piece of tarmac that sits there doing nothing.


I could equally say, "how exactly can a 500ft cliff be dangerous? It's a piece of rock that stands there doing nothing."

But I won't, because, unlike you, I'm not trying to be argumentative for the sake of it.

You know exactly what I meant.

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 19:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Big Tone wrote:
How can a numerical speed sign dictate what is dangerous?

It's just a sign that sits there doing nothing WEEPEJ?


No, it's a sign that tells people what the maximum speed limit is. They are then supposed to adjust their driving accordingly.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 19:54 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
dcbwhaley wrote:
So you are saying that speed limits are a 'vote winner'.


No, that's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that other measures they could employ - like the ones you mentioned - are likely to be vote-losers.

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 20:04 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
weepej wrote:
Because some people would drive dangerously fast otherwise?


Oh, do come off it!. This started out by discussing a road that had its limit dropped from 40 to 30. Are you suggesting that 40 has suddenly become a 'dangerously fast speed' on the road in question?

Tell me who's more dangerous - an alert driver driving at 40mph, or a driver doing 20mph with their eyes closed?

Answers on the back of a £50 note, please.

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 21:03 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
weepej wrote:
A road ain't dangerous until somebody drives dangerously on it surely?

And what factors could cause that dangerous driving:
Steve previously wrote:
weepej wrote:
How exactly can a road be dangerous? It's a piece of tarmac that sits there doing nothing.

Looks like we'll have to repeat ourselves again!
Answer: unreasonable regulations that foster frustration and encourage unpredictable behaviour - the "inconsistent & confusing 'messages'" we are talking about.

:roll:

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 23:03 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
Because some people would drive dangerously fast otherwise?

A road ain't dangerous until somebody drives dangerously on it surely?


So what speed is "dangerously fast"? And what is "driving dangerously" on one road that isn't "driving dangerously" on another?

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 23:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
weepej wrote:
Big Tone wrote:
How can a numerical speed sign dictate what is dangerous?

It's just a sign that sits there doing nothing WEEPEJ?


No, it's a sign that tells people what the maximum speed limit is. They are then supposed to adjust their driving accordingly.


So is it safe to drive at the speed the sign says then?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 23:43 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
Mole wrote:
So is it safe to drive at the speed the sign says then?


Oh, I'm sure that you'll find more than a few people of the weepy one's mindset belting down single-track country lanes at 59mph, simply because the speed limit is 60 so it must be safe :roll:

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 23:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Mole wrote:
weepej wrote:
Big Tone wrote:
How can a numerical speed sign dictate what is dangerous?

It's just a sign that sits there doing nothing WEEPEJ?


No, it's a sign that tells people what the maximum speed limit is. They are then supposed to adjust their driving accordingly.


So is it safe to drive at the speed the sign says then?



On the road outside -it's :20: -but then - just down the road ,mr PLONKER has parked his P & J , opposite Mrs Pratt's kiddemobile - so there could be kiddies about -so now :20: don't look such a good idea , :05mph: looks even better - or perhaps :ss: -and that's just a run down my street n a QUIET day . But hey - there's a bike -no such reluctance for him - but ,as he's on a bike ,he won't hit any kids.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 00:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:26
Posts: 36
Location: UK
weepej wrote:
Big Tone wrote:
How can a numerical speed sign dictate what is dangerous?

It's just a sign that sits there doing nothing WEEPEJ?


No, it's a sign that tells people what the maximum speed limit is. They are then supposed to adjust their driving accordingly.


But the problem is that a lot of people don't adjust their driving accordingly. They stick dead to the speed limit,(Because that's what they think is safe) eyes fixed on the speedo
and if they do go over the limit, on go the brakes again and again.
As someone said a speed limit is an arbitrary and unscientific number on a pole, you can not die going over that number, you can die if you drive dangerously
and this can happen at any speed.
On my trip into work which is about 45mins away I go through 14 different speed limit changes. Some I can understand others I can't.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 07:28 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
When I learnt to drive there were two main speed limits ,30MPH and 70MPH. You rarely saw any others.

You learnt that 30MPH meant a built up area and you had to look out for peds, animals etc and you also learnt that 70MPH wasn't a safe speed to stick to everywhere else, all of the time.

In other words, you LEARNT TO READ THE ROAD AND DRIVE ACCORDINGLY.

What do modern road speed limits tell inexperienced drivers?

It would appear to tell them to stick to the limit shown, DON'T think for yourself and that's why Britain is no longer one of the safest countries in Europe for motoring.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 08:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
weepej wrote:
Big Tone wrote:
How can a numerical speed sign dictate what is dangerous?

It's just a sign that sits there doing nothing WEEPEJ?


No, it's a sign that tells people what the maximum speed limit is. They are then supposed to adjust their driving accordingly.
No! The day that sign has an active screen and changes to take account of the weather, the prevailing circumstances and my alertness - it is just a sign that sits there doing nothing.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.090s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]