Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jul 28, 2026 22:47

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 18:55 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
GreenShed wrote:
...you will be hard pushed to find any information based upon facts from Safety Camera Partnerships or government figures...


Quite.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 21:12 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Johnnytheboy wrote:
GreenShed wrote:
...you will be hard pushed to find any information based upon facts from Safety Camera Partnerships or government figures...


Quite.

Yes! And if you don’t mind me adding JtB... In this new world of transparency, many things are still about as transparent as a sheet of lead!!! :x

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 21:28 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
GreenShed wrote:
you will be hard pushed to find any information based upon facts from Safety Camera Partnerships or government figures..




Perhaps a modification of a tale about a statue to a politician ,replacing that figure with SCP "FACTS " ---

It was proposed to erect a statue to the road safety work done by the SCPs of the UK, but owing to the debate on their view of "Truth" - great confusion reigned as where to place the statue .

Could they place it near George Washington ( who always told the truth) .
Or next to LLoyd George ,(who was reputed never to do so )
As the SCP s couldn't tell the difference-having been caught up in a hotch pot of untruths and innuendo for that long ,that truth had been eradicated from their vocabulary .
Or another 60's story ,brought up to date --

When SCP say they want to make roads safer - perhaps they're telling the truth .
When SCPs say that they want less deaths /injuries on our roads - their intentions are honourable .

But when they wheel out their record on road safety ,and how our roads are now safer - somehow ,the words of Winston Churchill "terminal inexactitude " start to ring out . :D

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 13:15 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 14:11
Posts: 12
botach wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
FOI detailed budgets from relevant authorities? Might require research effort that is not entirely web-based however!


Was thinking of a year or so back ,when we used to post up SCP data and analyse it - come in Roger -does this ring a bell -and more importantly - have we still got it .


would be good if i could obtain a copy of this also?

unfortunaley information like this isnt available so readily now... fustrasted me abit to be honest... although there are some offical stats but they relate to KSIs not the £££ side of things.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 13:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 14:11
Posts: 12
GreenShed wrote:
paddy0612 wrote:
Big Tone wrote:
paddy0612 wrote:
...iv included a fair bit of info from this site onto my project
This site will expect royalties you know? :D


havard referencing ;) and it will be printed off to show as part of the research, no cheating :lol:

Have you asked someone from an organisation who would know the answers you seek?

You have assumed that the government (and councils and the police) would seek to prevent information from being released to you but you have not said you have approached them.

While it is clear that members of this forum have a view and indeed some would give an expert view of some of the considerations you need to take into account you would have difficulty in working out what is or is not a worthwhile opinion of "fact".

There is little in this thread of worth and you will be hard pushed to find any information based upon facts from Safety Camera Partnerships or government figures...stands by for the sarcastic comments on the Safety Camera Partnerships or government figures...indicative of the efficacy of the forum commentary.

I would say a good place to start on the "does it make money?" question is the high level accounts operated and published by the Treasury and the DfT that can be used as a simple profit and loss account. The principle operated by the 2 government departments is that there is no direct link between money in and money out and the money collected in fines is usually quite close to the money paid out in the cost of running the system, net profits being close to £0.00.

In that simple accounting the answer must be "to save lives" but further consideration should be given to just simple accounting as this answer. It is the considered opinion of road safety experts from many areas of the industry and governments that speed management yields reductions in the amount and seriousness of casualties as a result of road traffic collisions; in that respect a reduction in government spending in the investigation of death and the care of those either affected by he deaths and those seriously injured may be considered in some way as "making money" because it is a saving in a high level government budget thereby making a notional "profit" from that reduced spending.

You will find it difficult to find the price of a camera installation because they differ in cost depending on the amount of cameras bought by each county at any time or even the amount of cameras they say or are assessed as possibly buying. In addition to this there is a separate installation cost; it is cheaper to install a camera in a town than it is to do so in a rural area; for instance I have been asked to pay almost £100,000 for a power cable and £50,000 for a telephone line and that was before you purchase the camera and dig holes to put it in. In the town this may reduce to around £150 for the telephone line and nothing for the power. Maybe an average for the whole country could be £60-75k for installation. The costs of running the cameras is a far more difficult thing to estimate as this depends on the type of camera and how often it is used. Digital cameras can be used 24/7 and catch thousands of motorists a week (potentially) and need no roadside attention whereas wet-film cameras, the biggest installed population in the UK, require roadside attention so do not operate a high duty cycle. This means that digital cameras are less expensive to run in that they need little in the way of attention and stores but produce more work for the police back-office administration staff and of course the courts; wet-film cameras don't work often, require swathes of film and processing yet have little in the way of on-costs for the legal organisations. The costs are dependent therefore on the type of camera, the amount it detects and the way in which it is operated and will change from county-to-county.

The process of cases through the courts when they leave the fixed penalty procedure places a huge financial load on the courts and hence the government; you would need to mention this and make an estimate based upon courts service figures.

IMHO, cameras are operated on a fixed budget enforced by central government and that fixed budget now exceeds the revenue from number of fines collected, so in respect of a simple cash analysis it runs at a loss. If you include savings from a reduction in injury and death then you have an area of fiscal and social profit that could be mentioned. If, as is proposed by the membership of the forum here and the site founder in materials elsewhere on the site, the system creates more death and injury then the government and society are loosing £100M's so running it to make money is failing.

It would be interesting to see your bibliography and of course to understand who was going to make the assessment of your answer as there are very few who would be able to make that assessment. Perhaps they are simply going to assess you breadth of research and analysis technique. My recommendation is to learn to asses the efficacy of Internet content as much of it is unreliable and questionable at best.

If you have not approached the DfT for your figures then you have failed at the first hurdle.

Good luck.


apologises i dont know how to do the multi quote thing but anyway

If you do a bit of web based research you can see they wouldnt want you to know about it otherwise it’d be on their website publicly, it is not on their website publicly. but whenther or not i opproach them or not doesnt matter to me, it is all ‘research’ and worthwhile to me.

Which organisation would i ask? There isnt much point as my main question is – how much do you make from speed cameras annually and have you got a record from when you introduced speed cameras to now the annual figures... i very doubt they would give me that.

IMO the only people who can make these kind of assessments are the ones who are behind the speed cameras. Not the general public that is the issue however bearing in mind the final write up will be only 3000 words.
I already have three times that in research alone and could get more if i wanted to but if i was to actually go and find out, i feel i would be running around in circles based on the research so far.
I will post up the essay + questionnaires + bilbography and so on when iv written it all up and checked it all.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 13:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 14:11
Posts: 12
Big Tone wrote:
You may also like to investigate why it is that the very people who are in the business of knowing exactly who and what are the real risks on our roads do not penalise drivers with a speeding conviction like they do for other violations.

I’ve noticed trolls always conveniently avoid that question; it doesn’t fit with their argument.

Try it yourself Patrick, both with and without a speeding endorsement using an online site like eCar or eBike or Swinton or....

Then try it with something which is a real danger, like overtaking on double white lines or going over a red light ;)

:welcome:


included this in my research, many thanks! i did a insurance quote on my civic type r, already have 3points (SP30 42mph in 30mph zone) and i changed my offence to ts10 running a red light the quote shot up from £1590 to £2243 (owch)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 18:19 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
included this in my research, many thanks! i did a insurance quote on my civic type r, already have 3points (SP30 42mph in 30mph zone) and i changed my offence to ts10 running a red light the quote shot up from £1590 to £2243 (owch)



It's nice to see that the insurance companies still realise which "offences" are a greater danger to road users.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 18:43 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
I have some insurance - Chauffeur Plan - which pays me a modest sum towards taxis if I am unable to drive. This is really intended to cover sickness and injury but, interestingly they do include being banned from driving by totting up - but only on speeding offences. I do think that being that caught for simple speeding is seen as bad luck rather than bad driving these days.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 20:10 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
paddy0612 wrote:
..already have 3points (SP30 42mph in 30mph zone)

YOU MANIAC! Image

"Houston, launch the least punctuated post ever on Safe Speed."

3....
2....
1....

I bet you did it going downhill at night on Parents Evening when it was pouring with rain and children were all over the place on a road more akin to a river than a road past parked cars after having had a drink but nothing which would put you over the limit and earlier wiped an area of condensation off your windscreen the size of a dinner plate in your Hummer complete with Bull Bars on tyres which are just legal through your old eyes which haven't been tested in 30+ years but "I can see perfectly well" through the smoke of my cigarette as I change the radio station which is so loud and I am so deaf I can neither see nor hear the siren or blue flashing light way behind me from an ambulance which is desperately trying to get to a victim because someone like me who has no speeding convictions just caused a KSI but I didn't notice because I was also on my mobile phone which the speed cameras didn't notice because they're dumb and there's never a traff pol when you need one who can observe bad and dangerous driving for the conditions but it doesn't matter because we have speed cameras and that's okay!!!

Because because because.... because of the wonderful things they do. Rat at tat tat tat tat tat..

;)


Take care Pat and I wish you well in your project :)

Just me, Tone, on the front line... Image

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 00:20 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
paddy0612 wrote:
botach wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
FOI detailed budgets from relevant authorities? Might require research effort that is not entirely web-based however!


Was thinking of a year or so back ,when we used to post up SCP data and analyse it - come in Roger -does this ring a bell -and more importantly - have we still got it .


would be good if i could obtain a copy of this also?

unfortunate information like this isn't available so readily now... frustrated me abit to be honest... although there are some official stats but they relate to KSIs not the £££ side of things.


Paddy - what I was referring to was a few years ago copies of SCP audited sheets of expenses - some years prior to hiving off -it wa almost like looking at how MPs spent expenses . Roger did organise a take up of SCP published data - if he don't come on ( and I gather he's busy ) - might be worth a PM to ask if he's still got the data

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 05:05 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
Sorry for delay in my response and sparse appearances of late...

I will e-mail the Excel file I have - from 2007 - to Claire for distribution.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 20:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 14:11
Posts: 12
Big Tone wrote:
paddy0612 wrote:
..already have 3points (SP30 42mph in 30mph zone)

YOU MANIAC! Image

"Houston, launch the least punctuated post ever on Safe Speed."

3....
2....
1....

I bet you did it going downhill at night on Parents Evening when it was pouring with rain and children were all over the place on a road more akin to a river than a road past parked cars after having had a drink but nothing which would put you over the limit and earlier wiped an area of condensation off your windscreen the size of a dinner plate in your Hummer complete with Bull Bars on tyres which are just legal through your old eyes which haven't been tested in 30+ years but "I can see perfectly well" through the smoke of my cigarette as I change the radio station which is so loud and I am so deaf I can neither see nor hear the siren or blue flashing light way behind me from an ambulance which is desperately trying to get to a victim because someone like me who has no speeding convictions just caused a KSI but I didn't notice because I was also on my mobile phone which the speed cameras didn't notice because they're dumb and there's never a traff pol when you need one who can observe bad and dangerous driving for the conditions but it doesn't matter because we have speed cameras and that's okay!!!

Because because because.... because of the wonderful things they do. Rat at tat tat tat tat tat..

;)


Take care Pat and I wish you well in your project :)

Just me, Tone, on the front line... Image


hahahaha love your explanation of how i got caught doing 42 in a 30... il explain how now..

as a 17year old in my little saxo i was driving down a 30 road which looked like a 40 to me and i stuck to 40 as a result of my assummption and lo behold there was a slight drop in the road going downhill...

resulting in me doing about 45 on my speedo... which i eased off the acclerator in order to slow back down to 40 but was in no rush because it was 2am in the morning, felt like everyone was dead, nobody about but as i passed a church a female copper jumped out of the bushes! gave me a fright and i very almost ingored her until i realised she was a copper... the male copper had hidden at the front of the church behind a wall with a hand held gun! :bluelight:

i just put it down to them being sneaky arseholes lol but this is going back two years now... they should come off this time next year :drink2:

it doesnt really bother me but your explanation was almost correct! oh and i didnt smoke back then!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 20:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 14:11
Posts: 12
Roger wrote:
Sorry for delay in my response and sparse appearances of late...

I will e-mail the Excel file I have - from 2007 - to Claire for distribution.


email it to me, Paddy0612@aol.com if its possible? :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 20:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 14:11
Posts: 12
dcbwhaley wrote:
I have some insurance - Chauffeur Plan - which pays me a modest sum towards taxis if I am unable to drive. This is really intended to cover sickness and injury but, interestingly they do include being banned from driving by totting up - but only on speeding offences. I do think that being that caught for simple speeding is seen as bad luck rather than bad driving these days.


thats interesting.... i shall google them and find out their policy


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 21:50 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Roger wrote:
Sorry for delay in my response and sparse appearances of late...

I will e-mail the Excel file I have - from 2007 - to Claire for distribution.


Think that's the info I was on about .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:16 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
paddy0612 wrote:
hahahaha love your explanation of how i got caught doing 42 in a 30... il explain how now..

Oh I was just goofin’ Paddy; a sort of allegory to exaggerate the absurdity between the extremes you could go to while remaining ‘point-free’ and driving in a much safer manner but which gets you points, without prizes. :D

I’ve done the same myself in fact where the conditions were safe, but that counts for nothing these days; just that all-knowing all-seeing posted sign.

I’m sure you weren’t about to kill or seriously injure anyone but at least the cops got their pound of flesh. I would have more respect for them if they had done the same thing during the day when there were people about, (apart from those two fools playing hide and seek), but it’s not about making roads safer unfortunately. Maybe they were concerned for the headgehogs or foxes...

Take care

Tone :)

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 177 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.070s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]