weepej wrote:
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
The number of speed-camera penalties issued to motorists dropped sharply in the latest figures released this week. Over the same period in 2007, road deaths fell to their lowest level since records began, undermining claims that an increase in cameras improves road safety.
I don't get that, surely it indicates increasing compliance with speed limits which is the whole point?
Actually I didn't say that - it is stated from the article that I quoted -perhaps unclear so, I have edited now with a colour to try to help show this

But ....
Number of things are going on on the roads - from less miles traveled, people taking alternative routes, people banned, many jobs have gone, more companies are using home offices, Lorries travel slower so travel less miles, more foreign drivers, number plate cloning (out of control in big city areas - I am given to understand) = paperless trails, -recession makes people more defensive and careful, more products are sold to inform about camera sites, more cameras have less 'film' in, what else ?
Cameras are STILL wrong - nothing has changed they remain silent on informing about good driving techniques and skills.
He claims that he was unaware of his speed at 90 - very troubling in itself.
He was in a modern Volvo (270bhp one) with some of his family in it.
He failed to observe the Trafpol unit also a concern.
His firm say they are involved in Safe Driving improvements.
I seriously hope that this WILL change his whole attitude to numeric value targets, through speed camera use and how pointless it is in any Road Safety scheme.
His actions question what he represents.
Safe Drive
here ...
state in support :
Serco work with governments in Britain and around the world to help protect their citizens. This involves working into areas such as law enforcement and managing offenders; they also operate the National Traffic Control Centre in Birmingham monitoring all of the country’s main trunk roads to help keep traffic flowing freely.
Serco are delighted to support Safe Drive Stay Alive because for far too many young people unsafe driving ends in a prison sentence, and they want to help change that.
Tom Riall, Chief Executive, Serco Civil Government said: “In courts and in our prisons we see the direct consequences of reckless and dangerous driving every single day. For far too many young people it ends with a prison sentence, but for the families left behind the pain lasts much longer. Serco is delighted to support Safe Drive Stay Alive because we want to help bring about change for the young drivers and all those whose lives are affected.” www.serco.comAND
HereWhich although in the face of it seems like a good idea to discourage reckless driving, it needs to contain a more balanced approach IMHO, with much more on how to be a good driver too.