Abercrombie wrote:
Mole wrote:
And yet, for all the massive added complexity of...
...a piece of wire and a bulb....
Somehow pad wear warning lights are a bad idea????!
If only it were that simple, Mole. There's a sensor, which fails. Sometimes it goes off too early, making you buy brake shoes before you need them. Sometimes it goes to late, and you wreck your disks anyway. Sometimes it doesn't go off at all.
It hooks up to software. The software must be changed. The sensor and the software changes have to be paid for. The console must be redesigned, the fuse box must be redesigned. The wiring harness must be redesigned. The subcontractors manufacturing and supply chain systems must be re-engineered. The spares department must now stock two versions of the instrument console. Then there's another change, and it needs 3, 4 or 5 copies of the same piece. Then a bug is found in the software. The car is called back into the dealers. And so it goes on; a decent design degrades into a great steaming pile of rubbish, over time. Because of a brain fart about a piece of wire and a bulb....
Is that really true????
Here's how mine (and as far as I'm aware, every other one I've ever seen) works.
The pad has a "sensor" in it. The "sensor" is, in fact, a piece of wire set into the friction material a set distance from the backplate. It comes "free" with the pad (although, it's true that if I were to buy the set for the version of my car that DOESN'T have pad wear indicators I'd save a quid (per axle). As I do all my own maintenance, I save far more than that on fitting costs, so I don't really care and I splash out on the expensive ones.
The wire that comes out of the pad is connected to a cable that goes up the inner wheelarch to the instrument cluster. It then goes along a printed circuit board to a bulb. From the bulb it goes back to earth through the disc. There are no "computers" anywhere to be seen in that system. Whether or not more modern offerings have the increased level of complexity that you mention, I don't know. But it's certainly not necessary. I guess that a possible refinement of the system would be to make it "latch" so that the light doesn't flicker irritatingly as it makes and breaks contact with the disc. That could be something that a manufacturer might choose to do IF there was already a central control computer being used for other things. I somehow doubt, however, that the pad wear warning light system would justify a computer all of its own though.
What I probably also ought to say, however, is that becuase mine is an old car, I have the wheels off so often that I don't think I've ever actually changed a set of pads when the light comes on. I tend to change them at about 2/3 thickness to try and preserve my horrible sliding brake callipers from working at maximum extension. When it was new though, I would have thought it would have been a useful feature. I don't like waiting until I hear the sound of the backplates graunching away at the discs, because (a) it doesn't do the discs any good and (b) my brakes won't be working at their best. But I guess it would save the cost of a bulb and a piece of wire!