SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
I am thinking :
that they will use ISA to not only start to charge for all roads used, (and not used in some cases when, as it will, go wrong) and also for every time that the limiter is turned off, and so a faster speed is used than the posted limit, and for all those occasions the driver will have to justify why s/he did that and will be fined for every occasion.
This way about a quarter of the drivers will be off the roads in a few years, and then the Government can slap themselves on the back for achieving the targets agreed with Europe (years ago now) that by 2010 (or so forget the exact date) they will have got about 25% (7million) of UK drivers off the roads ! Not to say the massive fines imposed will solve several monetary problems for the government.
... perhaps ...
Voluntary speed control is the first step to acceptance of mandatory speed control.
All the proposed designs will have to be updated remotely, this will almost certainly be by some sort of gsm communication.
Which will mean a two-way flow of information.
Just because the driver has selected to only receive warnings and not to accept control does not mean that that decision will be final. It may well be that automatic speed control cannot be overridden in selected areas, or that it can ONLY be overridden in selected areas.
As for people being "driven off the roads by this system....unlikely. People are already being forced to reconsider personal transport in the light of economic reality. Public transport is looking better to me [cost-wise] than personal transport in SOME cases (it is only 12 quid return to brighton by rail.....ticket through a tourist office) (200 miles there and back).
However, the reality of disease infection on public transport means that buses are not a reality !