Safe Speed Forums

I couldn't say, for me most of them are blocked

I will say this: the HTML of this page shows the link of that ad is the following:
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js

Now does that sound like a link specifically set up by the safespeed website?

At the timne of posting, this was the link...

http://www.endsjobsearch.co.uk/?gclid=C ... MAodNFYZvw

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.

This post has been edited as it appeared incorrect, - it was meant to show the following, (only html code appeared) we believe this was meant :

Speed Camera Got You Eh? Get Out Of Speeding Tickets & Fines With No Points! 100% Guaranteed ]

www.UK-Driving-Secrets.com

Police Camera Detector GPS based speed camera detector Free updates for life, voice alerts

www.microfuzion.co.uk

Do you need a kleenex jomukuk?

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.

Oh, sorry. I edited it to fit the page just now. It's the code for the top right google ads !

Do we really need all this, or can we just conclusively say that Gatsos Forever is ignorant.

Given his past masterful grasp of the concepts of logic, the fact that he is so wholly ignorant means that his opinion on anything is not only void, but utterly wrong! Oh, and he supports terrorists!

Or you could just say that he/she has multiple personalities ?
Or is......

Of course he failed to answer he can't. His intention is to come onto the forum to shout ignorant fallacies without backing them up, rather than enter a meaningful debate.

In "gatsos forever's" world, everything is black and white, so anyone who disagrees with him must be stupid. This may also mean that he has to ignore huge amounts of facts to arrive at his position, but so be it.

He probably thinks he is being really clever, it's a shame he doesn't realise that the converse is true.

If he's as clever as he thinks he is then why doesn't he just off, create a web site called 'speed kills' or 'gatsos forever' where he can put forward his argument and we'll see just how many subscribe?

If wanker$ could fly he'd be a squadron leader.

Sorry to be vulgar but he is an ignorant bore and should be treated with all the contempt he deserves IMHO...

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.

Steady with the [sic], Odin!

OED: "Signal: remarkably good or bad, conspicuous, noteworthy, [my bold], exemplary, condign (s. victory, defeat, reward, punishment, virtue, example). Hence signally."

OK, I'm a pedant.

I'll get my coat.

_________________
Save a cow - eat a vegetarian

I'll think it, Tone. You say it

Good on ya!

_________________
Simon

OK - so that means the content of the page is pro-speed. So, SS is pro-speed, especially with the comment 'visit these links to support SS' (or something like that). If SS is not pro-speed why aren't the offending comments removed? Why are there hate campaigns against anyone who is pro-safety - shouldn't they be removed? What about the solicitor using the word 'technicalities' to describe how they intend to get convicted speeders off? Shouldn't SS do something to try to remove these adverts? Or are these allowed because SS hates speed limit enforcement?

Oh dear lord, are you being deliberately obtuse, or are you genuinely that hard of thinking?

SS subscribe to the Google Ads service. Google ads serve ads based on the words that appear in the page(s). When someone clicks a Google Ad then SS gets a tiny little bit of money from Google Ads. The advertisers pay Google Ads to advertise based on key-words about their service.

When you type things like 'speed', 'camera' and 'technicality' you are feeding the algorithm. In fact, given your forum name, and frequency of posting, you probably contribute the vast majority of content that results in ads for things relating to speed cameras in the threads to which you 'contribute'. By your logic that means that you are largely responsible for the ads you so dislike. You must be pro-speed!

Incidentally, you may consider yourself pro-safety, but you are deluded, in the same manner as when you generalise that everyone here is pro-speed. If you were truly interested in safety then you would enter the debate with an open mind, looking to find things to make the roads safer. You are, in fact, pro-control. This need not be to the exclusion of safety, but in your case you've illustrated time and again that you are more interested in shouting people down with your dogma than looking to make the roads safer for all.

Furthermore; everyone who is accused of a crime is entitled to a defence. Presumably even you cannot subscribe to the idea that everyone who is accused of a crime is automatically guilty. If the enforcers of the law have been less than fastidious in the execution of their duties then there may exist flaws which are fatal to the case. These checks and balances are there to protect the general public from sloppy law enforcement. If they do not serve this purpose then it is up to the legislature/judiciary to remove them. 'Technicality' is a term applied by those who wish to cover up the fact that they have not executed their duty correctly.

If you still cannot get your head round this matter then the only thing left is to draw you a picture. Bring your construction paper and crayons.

Worst. Troll. Ever.

_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.

"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (Conservative Way Forward: Stop The War Against Drivers)

Just demonstrates how shallow the gene pool can get.

_________________
Simon

If ever the gene pool needed a good dose of Chlorine...

_________________
"Politicians are the same the world over... We build bridges where there aren't any rivers." - Nikita Kruschev

Someone born from where Chavs are alleged to originate from is technically a Chav. Even though the only "sins" of being a Chav may be their accent and their place of birth, which they cannot choose.

Please be a little less hostile to Chavs. Some of them would love a hug

_________________
Prepare to be Judged

Something you want to admit to?

I don't know what your definition of Chav is, but mine is equivalent to the northern term, Scally, meaning someone who hands around (usually in a hoody, sweat pants and trainers) generally making trouble, shoplifting, keying cars and the like. You're only a Chav if you behave like one..

(Mind you, you do like R1's... )

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.

I believe Chav was originally used by the students of Cheltenham 'Ladies' College as an abbreviation for 'Cheltenham Average', their term for the local proles.

'Looking to find things to make the roads safer'? - that's great coming from yourself, someone who supports a campaign to remove road saftey equipment and raise speed limits.