Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 30, 2026 13:53

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 18:59 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
glaikie wrote:
So, er, how many motors ought I to be able to afford to run at artificially suppressed costs before it becomes necessary for me to gripe?


You can out forward an argument by all means, but there is no need to be insulting or personal

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 19:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 23:24
Posts: 94
Oscar wrote:
See he's still reeling you all in............ :roll:

Not just me pal.
The RAC, the AA, the Govt. Office of National Statistics, the WRVS (probably) and the Fancy Rat Society.
We've all got it in for the poor victimised motorist. :D

_________________
Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 19:17 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
glaikie wrote:
So, er, how many motors ought I to be able to afford to run at artificially suppressed costs before it becomes necessary for me to gripe?


You've not shown it to be the case, nor is there any reason for us to believe that the costs are "artificially surpressed". Would you care to justify and quantify this?

People, who work hard for their money, are perfectly at liberty to spend it however they wish. This does not prevent them from commenting if the costs of their desires spiral.

You've made a leap of assumption that I "run" two cars, go back and read again.

How do you respond, other than with insults and jibes, to the observation that the one set of cherry-picked figures you have unearthed to support your case is somewhat skewed towards a group of motorists who are not 'average'? I indicated to you a couple of posts ago how you could easily and unbiasedly collate figures to answer this question, but you seem reluctant, is it because you fear the truth? If not, why then?

I know, from my personal experience, that the 'real-terms' cost of my motoring, per mile, is rising at a rate above that of inflation. I've never actually 'griped' about it, but that does not mean I am happy about it. Your indignance that anyone should take notice of the increased costs and new charges does nothing to alter reality.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 19:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 23:24
Posts: 94
Quote:
People, who work hard for their money, are perfectly at liberty to spend it however they wish.

Not so, chump. I fancy spending my hard earned on Colombian coke and pre-pubescent whores. Anyone object to this?
Sure, some drivers are plugged into a 'we're above the law' ethos. But, er, you're not. Sorry to be the one breaking this to you.

If the data of motoring organisations like the AA and RAC don't satisfy you, what would?

_________________
Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 19:38 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
glaikie wrote:
So, er, how many motors ought I to be able to afford to run at artificially suppressed costs before it becomes necessary for me to gripe?


I think it depends if you are on increasing averages earnings or minimum pay or dwindling pension... or if your job re-locates and the council put up the parking to £7.00 a day.

I am happy running my 4 cars. I am grumpy about parking. and having to drive many more miles to reach my destination to avoid the queues and blocked roads. Then there is our missing south coast motorway .
build a road to sweep the M27 across the forest and up to Bristol so I dont have to go to Newbury to get any where.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 19:41 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
glaikie wrote:
Quote:
People, who work hard for their money, are perfectly at liberty to spend it however they wish.

Not so, chump. I fancy spending my hard earned on Colombian coke and pre-pubescent whores. Anyone object to this?
Sure, some drivers are plugged into a 'we're above the law' ethos. But, er, you're not. Sorry to be the one breaking this to you.

If the data of motoring organisations like the AA and RAC don't satisfy you, what would?


What utter rot, and missing the point completely. Owning more than one car is legal. Tough concept for you? Do you have any substantiation for the "artificially surpressed" claim?

The data you produced from the RAC is under the heading of Buying and Selling a car, hence the flaw in considering finance, and first-year depreciation. Just because its from the RAC, does that render you incapable of interpreting it, or questioning it's application in this debate?

'Chump' is yet another example of your utter inability to debate without resorting to ad hominem, a reliable indication of someone with no substance to their case. Try to avoid it, or you simply confirm everyone's suspicions that you are nothing more than a troll.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 19:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 23:24
Posts: 94
RobinXe wrote:
What utter rot, and missing the point completely. Owning more than one car is legal. Tough concept for you? Do you have any substantiation for the "artificially surpressed" claim?

Yes. I kicked off with it. Over a thirty year period which has seen public transport costs rise by >50% for bus and rail transport, has seen the RPI more than double, the costs of motoring have been pegged back with subsidy from the general taxpayer - whether he drives or not - to 10% less than they were 30 years ago.
What say you express some long overdue gratitude, you greedy selfish moaners?

_________________
Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights?


Last edited by glaikie on Mon Dec 24, 2007 20:03, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 19:55 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
glaikie wrote:
What say you express some long overdue gratitude, you greedy selfish moaners?


You are obviously trying to provoke someone into banning you from the forum. Stick to the argument and stop the name calling. If one of the mods DOES ban you, it will because of the name calling and NOT because of the argument.

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 19:56 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
glaikie wrote:
What say you express some long overdue gratitude, you greedy selfish moaners?


Well, I too am done debating with you if you cannot refrain from your continued ad hominem, nor rebut any of my extant points without recourse to vitriolic invective. Its another old troll trick, turn everyone off debating with you through your thoroughly unpleasant manner, then try to claim victory.

You're obviously very bitter about something motoring-related, its a shame it has turned you into such an odious little toad.

Do try to have a Merry Christmas, good day to you.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 20:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 23:24
Posts: 94
And like that - poof! - they're gone.

_________________
Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 20:07 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
glaikie wrote:
And like that - poof! - they're gone.


:bow:

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 20:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
In general I have no problem with people buying as many cars as they want. It's not like they can drive them all simultaneously, is it?

I do object to people who do the above whilst not having the means to park them within the confines of their own property, however. :x There's an idiot who lives next door to my old man (cul-de-sac), who thinks it's great to plonk his Range Rover across my dad's driveway while his other cars sit in a line up to his front door...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 20:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 23:24
Posts: 94
mmltonge wrote:
Two more things....

As for accusing everyone of complaining, if you skip on back to page 1, you'll see the person who started this thread is in fact you.

No it wasn't. d'oh!
That someone might think so was an obvious risk of PeterE's woeful moderator decision to lift my post from the thread in which it belonged and use it to start a new thread. Originally it was tucked into the "Testing the limits of civilised behaviour" thread in response to the ridiculous assertion that motorists are somehow justified in behaving like utter fucking morons because they're being financially persecuted by a hostile establishment.
I'll take your apology as read.

_________________
Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 21:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 00:31
Posts: 393
[TiC]

Well with all this money we motorists are saving, we'll be able to driver bigger thirstier cars to feed our addiction to internal combustion.

That just leaves me the decision on the next old Jag for me get.
1) XJR
2) V12
:?

So if motoring is getting cheaper, cyclists and PT users will soon be able to afford cars, problem solved and we motorists can have the cycle and bus lanes back hence easing congestion. [/TiC]

My current car is the first that would cost more than my pushbike to replace.

fatboytim


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 00:22 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
weepej wrote:
adam.L wrote:
Later on this morning I did a cross country race in the middle of a field the other side of the county. You don't get trains in places like that and a taxi ride would be in painfull. So the car is really the only option for those journies, as will will be Christmas morning when I go and see the family 190 miles away in rural shropshire.


I didn't say its practical for everybody not to have access to a car.

Cross country runs in the middle of nowhere?

What about a minibus, or car share, or maybe use a street pool car?


Point 1;

All of the journies that I do are easier in a car. Even when I go to london on the main line commuter train it would be quicker and easier in the car as I have to get in the car to get to the station.

Point 2;

The nature of a cross country race dictates that you need "country" to "cross". Suprisingly.

Point 3;

When do car pool, just in private cars. A mini bus does about 28 to the gallon, my car does 35. What is the difference between a car with a street pool company on the V5 and a car with my name on the V5? I might as well have it sat on the drive.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 00:32 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
glaikie wrote:
[...]to the ridiculous assertion that motorists are somehow justified in behaving like utter fucking morons because they're being financially persecuted by a hostile establishment.

Can you point me to this assertion? I believe it was a suggestion, a reason put forward, that may help to explain why motorists 'go off on one'...

And do you really have to use such foul language?

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 01:00 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
glaikie sir,

On the first page of this thread I posted the approximate, but reasonably accurate costs of running my car and the 2 I had before. I note you choose to ingore this when arguing that I'm better off now despite my cost per mile going from 17 to 37 pence per mile.

My £300, 17 year old scooter has seen a slight drop in the price to insure it, but that is because I haven't crashed (safe rider, see!), the Tax disc is still £15 (I think) but parts go up, tyres go up and as you must be aware fuel as increased also.

In March my car was serviced MOT'd and had new brakes. £672 please sir. In October a new exaust pipe was fitted £317 please sir. I have only covered 5,000 miles since march. 1,000 quids worth on maintainance on a very reliable car. That sir is not cheap. I didn't used to spend that for 25,000 miles in 1994

This car is group 7 insurance the one I had before was group 11. This car is consistantly more economical that the one before, but is costing more to run. I don't care about which body with an interest in scuewing the figure to suit their arguement you want to listen to, the only figures I care about are my own and running a car is more expensive than ever.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 17:08 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 23:24
Posts: 94
Yawn.
So you bought a dud and your bills at the mechanics are bigger than you'd like. What of it?
While your personal anecdotes are diverting and very moving it would be a mistake to draw general conclusions from them.
So we won't.

_________________
Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 20:00 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
Bought a dud??? That has never gone wrong...

I don't know if you have ever had to maintain a car sir, but you will find that labour charges are sky high. I seem to remember being charged £13.75/hr in 1991. It now costs £51 for 20 minutes labour to fit an exhaust.

The car I ran in 1995 car 17 pence per mile, fuel is now 13 pence per mile for a car that only uses marginally more fuel.

I have less power, less performance, more economy and more reliablity, lower VED rating and lower insurance and the cost of ownership is higher. Mr G. Brown wipes out savings faster that I can make them. It is easy to say that car A will be cheaper to run than car B, what we can't do is second guess whether or not Mr. G. Brown will stick a big tax shaped spanner in the works to muck up our calculations. There is no other commodity I buy that I have to pay 300% more than it is worth.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 20:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 23:24
Posts: 94
No-one's ever had to maintain a car.
Where's the 'ignore' button on this site?

_________________
Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.078s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]