SafeSpeed wrote:
IanH wrote:
In Cumbria we still have the same as 10 years ago, although in order to retain numbers we had to incorporate the ARV (about 5% of our worktime including training).
What about admin and paperwork Ian?
Many trafpol have complained to me that too much paperwork keeps them off the road with at least two doublings in paperwork since 1983.
The secret, as with driving, is planning.
Yes we have plenty of paperwork, probably more than 10 years ago, more time spent completing paperwork required for statistical analysis, new forms for injury collisions. We have to be more accountable and this requires extra paperwork or data input. We have to record every stop search. We will soon have to record every stop. I have recently taken on a family liaison responsibility which involves an investigative but supporting responsibility with the bereaved family after a fatal RTC. This is again time consuming and paper intensive, but it is a role which complements the officer in case and his senior investigating officer, so the time cost of the extra work has to be balanced against the benefit accrued. Intel recording is time consuming and can be seen as a bind. If you have any intel to submit it must be completed on a separate form and submitted through the area intelligence unit. Of course the collated intel can result in efficiency benefits through more specific targeting etc.
Probably over 80% of our paperwork can be completed in our cars. This mitigates the problem slightly, because we can still locate ourselves for high visibility while getting through the paperwork.
But....
The biggest thief of time is the damn thing I'm tapping away on now. Every day we come on duty we have to log in to our computer, then check emails, (usually about 30 per day usually 75% irrelevant). We then check the daily intel to see what is relevant to us, (again about 30 items daily, 10-15% relevance). We also have a specific traffic intel database which needs to be checked daily for targets etc.
We are also being encouraged to complete more and more paperwork on the computer, statements, intel, prosecution files, etc, which may well lead to us spending more time in our non wheeled office - (good argument for laptops, boss!

)
Quote:
One chap from a central England traffic garage said that they are down to just 8% of total officer time on patrol because of admin overhead.
Can you estimate what percentage of your time you're able to spend on patrol?
Yes, I'd say we patrolled for about 70% of our shift - including paperwork completion in the car. If you exclude that it would be about 50-55%. If you exclude incidents we are resourced to, we probably spend about 30% of our time on proactive patrol. These are rough approximations only. Obviously this does not include training days which are probably 20 per annum average, allowances for supervisory, admin roles etc.
Quote:
When you have "initiatives" (like a crack down on bald tyres for example) does that tend to take you off the road for long periods while you write up the paperwork for a dozen or more offences recorded?
Depends largely on the type of crackdown. We've just completed our winter drink drive campaign. I personally stopped about 600 cars on various static (con and use

) checks ). Out of those 600 I breath tested tested 16, none were positive. I got over 50 con and use offences, dealt with in the usual ways. None of this required any paperwork to be completed after the operation. VDRS forms, producers, fixed penalty tickets, drink drive forms and pocket book completed at the time. There will be some paperwork re the usual percentage of fail to produce docs, but that hasn't changed.
I have also been on ANPR operations where we have brought in prisoner after prisoner. The fall out from that type of operation - especially if you go one step beyond the intel and get a decent job out of a no VEL marker etc. - is that you are left with hours and hours of paperwork, file prep, property itemising and exhibiting etc etc. These operations, due to their targeted nature can be very effective, and efficient in respect of quality of offence per hour, but often little to do with traffic matters.
Quote:
And finally, if it is a problem, what would you do about it?
What problem are you referring to Paul?