Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 00:27

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 19:30 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
Rigpig wrote:
Interesting you think 'they' have lost the plot over instances that are quite readily governable by common sense, yet are quite happy with this one....

130
Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right.

If the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so.


Define 'necessary'. To overtake? Is overtaking ever necessary (genuine emergencies excepted) or just convenient?


Parked car.

Passing cyclist to give him enough space

Passing horserider to give enough space und also taking care not to spook the horse
:wink:

Overtaking a tractor

Ovetaking a milk float

Overtaking a mobility scooter

Overtaking a lawn mower (ride on tractor type grass cutter}

Overtaking a refuse truck which crawl from wheely bin to wheely bin

:wink:


The solids.. the :nono: ?// :? :?

You usually find where double whites or it merge with another road .. such as at motorway entrance points at end of slip road. You should not cross these nor should traffic move into lane if the L1 then join some other road quarter mile off this point (M55.. M55 und J34 to M6 :yikes: und in-laws moan about J13/14 M60 too. :banghead: here. )

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 19:33 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
I've been exploiting the shading (when safe to do so) for a couple of decades. I have NEVER ONCE seen a problem arise.

The range of ability and experience on our roads is vast. Any rule that guides the 'lower skill groups' away from danger while leaving the higher skills groups free to make safe and appropriate decisions is brilliant in my book.

Now if we could pull off the same trick with speed limits...


So you are happy with rules that give you an advantage even though others may not see it that way, but can pick fault with those that common sense will tell us we should not take absolutely literally if the situation dictates.
Sorry, it still seems a little bizarre to me.

_________________
Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 19:58 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
But Riggers .. all too often .. sigh.. these paint jobs of the broken hatchings. .. they just paint jobs.

They narrow the carriageway. Create congestion.

I have photo of what was an NSL dual carriageway (A57 on approach to Warburton Toll Bridge as taken by Mad Doc's sister Ju-Ju. (She one steady driver by the way. She never ever goes above any speed limit. She IAM trained like rest of us.. but she just drives without exceeding any limit regardless. How she does it? She sets her cruiser und her origin to blip if she ever go over. She say these help her get the discipline as each time her origin bleeped .. she reigned in. Now she used to "feel of the speed" more acutely. Which ist yet another example as to how to use the toys available to us really. But she not enjoy fast or fast fairground rides either. :shock: )

But anyway .. back to her photo of A57 which she condemn as "engineered congestion to justify some charging" I have not got this uploaded to our hoster as yet. I will ask her to do so. She better photographer und scanner than Jazz who ist "come day /go day" on this skill. :roll: But I have seen her photo. L2 ist hatched with solid white forcing all into one lane. No reason for this at all. It lead to congestion in the area as road space removed. Before this Ju-Ju said there was courteosu zip-merging which meant traffic actually did move, albeit at no more than 20 mph in "peak morning" towards the lights at the junction with the quaint toll bridge.l


Another example... we have a few here .. in Penrith/Kendal/Carlisle - but I think more a 'burb problem than a rural market town problem really. :wink: But in the Manchester burbs.. the in-laws tell me that A575 Walkden to border with Farnworth has these hatchings with pedestrian traffic islands. They say more minor scuffles occur there.

They then re-engineered the next section.. revertin back to wide carriageway. They also re-engineered the wide traffic lights where two girls were killed in the drunken DJ incident which Mad Doc reported on at the time it happen. But.. less incidents reported since they returned to sensible road markings und carriage widths here :wink: Or at least none reported in press or heard about by the local riff raff belonging to Ted's family :wink:


A575? It really now a question of good COAST skills per the in-laws because of now bizarre road engineering experiment. It not actually work. :roll: :popcorn:

They are broken hatchings.. but pedestrian islands prevent overtakes or cause incident when drivers do pass a stopped bus there. :roll:

If broken lines, clear und zero reason not to overtake something.. then go for it as/when safe und legal to do so.

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 20:18 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Icandoit wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
Icandoit wrote:
Broken white lines can be crossed. Solid can't. Doesn't matter about the hatching.

I'm pretty sure that the solid line only has the force of law:

a) On motorways
b) When it is part of a recognisable double white line system with central cats eyes.

See rule 130 of H/C.


Away from motorways the following TSRGD diagram applies: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/si/si2002/023113aw.gif - it shows double white line systems with an absolute maximum width of 1200mm.

On Motorways great triangles ('tiger tails') can be designated as unavailable zones. I haven't found the motorway road markings yet.

When LAs put solid borders on shaded sections (away from motorways) wider than 1200mm and I've seen lots - it is not a prescribed sign and has no force in law.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 20:41 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
It [solid white line on an area that does not strictly conform] may well provide a technicality for avoiding a wrap, much in the same way that a subntlely incorrect sign is a good technical rebuff against the technical offence of exceeding the intended (but inapplicable) speed limit when otherwise driving safely. However, in the abbsence of a tape measure or ability to judge 1200mm on the road, I think I would tend not to cross an unbroken white line into a hatched area, no matter what its width, unless doing so was to avoid or prevent an accident, whereas for any area that has shading without the solid white line, I would add to the above a visit to the hatched area if I could with certainty do so and get back again without imposition to anyone else, and it offered me material gain.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 20:45 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Roger wrote:
It [solid white line on an area that does not strictly conform] may well provide a technicality for avoiding a wrap, much in the same way that a subntlely incorrect sign is a good technical rebuff against the technical offence of exceeding the intended (but inapplicable) speed limit when otherwise driving safely. However, in the abbsence of a tape measure or ability to judge 1200mm on the road, I think I would tend not to cross an unbroken white line into a hatched area, no matter what its width, unless doing so was to avoid or prevent an accident, whereas for any area that has shading without the solid white line, I would add to the above a visit to the hatched area if I could with certainty do so and get back again without imposition to anyone else, and it offered me material gain.


Absolutely. I only said it might not have 'force of law'. I'd stay out as well, except in an emergency.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 08:54 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 19:41
Posts: 201
Location: North East Wales
Roger wrote:
It [solid white line on an area that does not strictly conform] may well provide a technicality for avoiding a wrap, much in the same way that a subntlely incorrect sign is a good technical rebuff against the technical offence of exceeding the intended (but inapplicable) speed limit when otherwise driving safely. However, in the abbsence of a tape measure or ability to judge 1200mm on the road, I think I would tend not to cross an unbroken white line into a hatched area, no matter what its width, unless doing so was to avoid or prevent an accident, whereas for any area that has shading without the solid white line, I would add to the above a visit to the hatched area if I could with certainty do so and get back again without imposition to anyone else, and it offered me material gain.


In Worcs and North Wales and many other places there are many thousands of metres of what was NSL Dual carriageway with the Lane 2 hatched off, sometimes with meaningless red tarmac and a white solid border. Sometimes the NSL is reduced to 60 50 or 40. It seems to be inspired by some PC madness. On the A541 Mold Wrexham DC 1400 yards of DC providing useful overtaking opportunities are reduced to 200 yards between such restricted lanes. It seems there is a concept that the Lane 2 must be closed off 440 yards before each central reservation gap.

_________________
Richard Ceen
We live in a time where emotions and feelings count far more than the truth, and there is a vast ignorance of science (James Lovelock 2005)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:14 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 15:27
Posts: 683
Location: New Forest
SafeSpeed wrote:
The range of ability and experience on our roads is vast. Any rule that guides the 'lower skill groups' away from danger while leaving the higher skills groups free to make safe and appropriate decisions is brilliant in my book.


I absolutely agree.

How can learning to drive well be any different to learning the rules well? Both can be used to our advantage, and ‘advantage’ is what advanced driving is all about.

_________________
It's tricky doing nothing - you never know when you're finished


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 13:40 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
In rule 130 it states that you must not enter an area marked with chevrons and bordered by a solid white line.

There is no mention of an area of diagonal stripes bordered by a solid white line.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 14:05 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
toltec wrote:
In rule 130 it states that you must not enter an area marked with chevrons and bordered by a solid white line.

There is no mention of an area of diagonal stripes bordered by a solid white line.


Indeed. It says:

Quote:
130

Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right.

* if the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so

* if the area is marked with chevrons and bordered by solid white lines you MUST NOT enter it except in an emergency


The second bullet point refers to motorway markings only doesn't it?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 14:33 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
SafeSpeed wrote:
toltec wrote:
In rule 130 it states that you must not enter an area marked with chevrons and bordered by a solid white line.

There is no mention of an area of diagonal stripes bordered by a solid white line.


Indeed. It says:

Quote:
130

Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right.

* if the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so

* if the area is marked with chevrons and bordered by solid white lines you MUST NOT enter it except in an emergency


The second bullet point refers to motorway markings only doesn't it?


I have seen chevrons with solid lines used on non-motorways, there are some on roundabout entrances near me.

In general I suppose a solid line is a solid line irrespective of what it bounds.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 15:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:27
Posts: 361
toltec wrote:
In general I suppose a solid line is a solid line irrespective of what it bounds.

I believe that it the intention the road designers have in using them.

Solid lines also separate bus and some cycle lanes. The H/C also says that you must not enter a cycle lane that has solid lines.... but that you can enter a bus lane to stop, load or unload if it is not prohibited. :loco: (See rules 140 and 141)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 16:03 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
I thought they were police parking bays :?

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 20:50 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Under this section:
Quote:
Application of section 36 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to signs and disqualification for offences
10. - (1) Section 36 of the 1988 Act shall apply to each of the following signs -

The following diagrams are listed. (This only includes ones which are road markings with white lines going along the road.)
1013.1
1013.3
1013.4
1042 & 1042.1
1045

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 01:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 19:43
Posts: 86
anton wrote:
I thought they were police parking bays :?
Nah, they're marked "Disabled".


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 02:30 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
guron83 wrote:
anton wrote:
I thought they were police parking bays :?
Nah, they're marked "Disabled".


They are only disabled after you have nicked the rotor arms or chained the back axle to something solid American Graffiti style. :hehe:

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 14:05 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 15:43
Posts: 40
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Also worth bearing in mind - areas of hatching bordered with broken lines mark the areas where the Evil Nail Fairies come out at night and do their Sprinkling Dance. I'm a biker, trust me on this.

_________________
Fatshoutybloke


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 14:31 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
MickW wrote:
Also worth bearing in mind - areas of hatching bordered with broken lines mark the areas where the Evil Nail Fairies come out at night and do their Sprinkling Dance. I'm a biker, trust me on this.


:hehe:

And the gravel ridge fairies. And the old bits of exhaust fairies. And lots of other fairies.

And I did mention earlier:

SafeSpeed wrote:
(With the sad exception of the possibility of debris).

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 21:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
MickW wrote:
Also worth bearing in mind - areas of hatching bordered with broken lines mark the areas where the Evil Nail Fairies come out at night and do their Sprinkling Dance. I'm a biker, trust me on this.


Also, I'm pretty certain that using the hatched area as an overtaking lane would not be considered "necessary" if you wiped out, or wiped somebody else out doing it and had to explain what you were doing in the ghost island to a judge in the first place.

Sure, for going round a very slow or parked vehicle perhaps, but not for impatiently roaring round somebody who's signalling to turn left.

Just like you're not supposed to reverese your vehicle for longer than is necessary.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 21:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
weepej wrote:
but not for impatiently roaring round somebody who's signalling to turn left.


One persons impatient roaring is anothers maintaining momentum...

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.061s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]