Dondare wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
Ru88ell wrote:
johnsher wrote:
one doesn't need a magic number to be able to drive/ride/walk safely.
Correct. But society demands that an upper limit is in place for reasons of safety and consideration for others. Of course we all vary our speeds constantly either on a bike or in a motor vehicle. The limit is just that. Just live with it.
We wuldn't be here if I didn't believe that thousands have died because of it.
So 'live with it' takes on a really sickly hue.
I know you think you've explained this, but it's still not making sense to me, how can speed limits have been responsible for thousands of deaths?
Would these people still be alive if speed limits hadn't been invented?
First things first. Speed limits are definitely a good thing. They serve a useful purpose, but they are only a weak proxy for the desired behaviour.
Modern policy based on "speed kills" has had a number of effects:
- All too often we (national we) we promote 'slower is safer' in a random way, damaging the vital link between speed and hazards
- We have expended far too many resources at every level getting a strong focus on the proxy and forgetting all about the desired behaviour.
- As a result of this driver skills are on average deteriorating.
- It's like we're all watching the referee rather than the ball
- As a result we're losing ground fast. The once reliable fall in road risk values has flatlined. If it hadn't flatlined we'd be over 1,200 lives per year better off than we are.
- And we shouldn't be surprised because in truth road safety is a complex matter of human behaviour centred around skills, attitudes and responsibilities.