massive link
Speedcam rule change revealed
RICHARD BALLS
April 7, 2004 07:00
Speeding no longer needs to be a cause of the fatal and serious injury accidents that are used to justify the location of fixed and mobile speed cameras, it has emerged.
Norfolk's Chief Constable Andy Hayman said yesterday that the failure of the Department for Transport (DfT) to publicise this change in the criteria had not helped to clear up the confusion among the public surrounding the decisions taken on the location of speed cameras.
For a fixed camera to be justified, there must have been four fatalities or serious injury collisions in the last three calendar years and at least eight personal injury collisions in the same period.
The 2002-03 site selection guidelines stated that speed had to be a contributory factor in some or all of the collisions and that collision sites that were clearly not speed-related had been "de-selected".
Under the new guidelines, however, speed has been removed as a "causation factor".
Mr Hayman, who supports the use of speed cameras, highlighted the change at the annual meeting of Norfolk Police Authority yesterday and criticised the Norfolk Casualty Reduction Partnership (NCRP) for failing to justify the locations selected for fixed and mobile cameras.
There was already a great deal of public confusion about the criteria governing the siting of speed cameras and this had been exacerbated by the revelation that it had been changed by the DfT.
"It would have helped if this change of criteria had been revealed earlier," said Mr Hayman.
"The only place it exists in the public domain is in the new DfT handbook in the House of Commons library."
A spokesman for the DfT said that the change in criteria had been introduced last autumn with the aim of giving an "in-built flexibility" to the overall speed camera capacity.
He stressed that the NCRP had been aware of the change from the outset and had it and the chief constable been communicating then he would also have known.
The partnership was set up in 2001 to run the county's speed cameras and has doubled the number of fixed cameras to 18 and brought in mobile patrols along 72 stretches of road.
But in a strongly-worded report to the police authority, Mr Hayman said several speed cameras had failed to meet national rules on siting, crucial accident data had been destroyed, and cameras were not properly monitored.
Stephen Bett, deputy police authority chairman, said Norfolk was conducting an audit into the location of speed cameras around the county, but he said it was being carried out by the NCRP.
He called for it to be carried out "more independently" and for a member of the police authority or elected councillor to oversee it.
"It [the partnership] was set up by the police and county council, but I find it amazing that the police has no control over these cameras as they are responsible for road policing," he said.
"It is officers from the partnership who decide on where the cameras are going to go and why and I think it is extremely dangerous."
Supt Mark Veljovic, partnership board chairman, agreed that elected members should form part of any body that was to oversee the organisation, although whether they were from the police authority or the county council was for them to decide.
"We do recognise the community concerns over the siting of the cameras and have therefore been working closely with the constabulary review team," he said.
"I am sure my board of members will agree that I am supportive of any measure designed to show true openness and transparency with the public. If that means the setting up of a body that sits between the partnership and the public then I don't think we could have any argument against it."
Police in Suffolk have issued a nine-point guide to wearing car seat belts in support of today's World Health Day campaign.
Figures released to coincide with the campaign suggest that up to 90pc of serious injuries to children are prevented by seat belts and car seats.
=====================================
This is the first I have heard about this rule change. Can it be true? Are they really this stupid at the top?