Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 21:46

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 14:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
basingwerk wrote:
St. Asaph occupies a beautiful part of the vale that has been spoiled by the 55. Now that the abysmal 55 has brought massive traffic to the area, planners want to blow a road up the back of the Elwy valley (which is lovely), to work around the problem they have created for themselves. That will force the bottleneck to Denbigh and Ruthin (lovely old towns) and they will be spoiled as well, moving the bottleneck along, and bringing pollution, noise and speeders. No thanks, Gizmo. Keep it in Hull.

Ah yes, North Wales was wonderful before they improved the A55, with appalling chronic congestion through the centres of St Asaph, Abergele, Colwyn Bay and Conway. Would it really be better to have all that traffic choking the narrow streets of Conway?

The A55 has dramatically improved communications in that part of the world. It also forms part of a strategic route to Ireland.

Perhaps you think North Wales was spoilt by Robert Stephenson building the Chester & Holyhead Railway with all those intrusive bridges and tunnels. Or Telford ruined the peace of Snowdonia by building what is now the A5?

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 19:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
St. Asaph? Are we talking about the same St. Asaph?

The one with the access to the Business Park directly off the high standard A55, that grade-separated interchange that I designed?

As for the road "up the Elwy valley", that is a mere pipe dream - a proposal put forward to satisfy councillors who were concerned about the impac tof potential improvements to the Bryn Dinas junction on the cathederal.

You know, those improvement that were finished last year.

I suppose you can't believe everything you read on the internet :roll:

Edites to say: where on earth is he A14? It's not in North Wales.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 23:02 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
millsee wrote:
improvements to the Bryn Dinas junction on the cathederal. You know, those improvement that were finished last year.


These horrid (I hesitate to use the word) improvements have blighted the grounds of the Cathedral, for God's sake! And they attract yet more heavy goods traffic through the city.

millsee wrote:
where on earth is he A14?


It is part of the bigger picture -

Code:
Ireland/United Kingdom/Benelux roadlink Roads

What is its current status? In England, construction of the A14 road linking the A1 and M6 has been undertaken,and improvements to six further sections are planned but are subject to the out-comes of studies. In Wales, improvements to the A55 were completed in 2001 ...

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 23:15 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
PeterE wrote:
Ah yes, North Wales was wonderful before they improved the A55, with appalling chronic congestion through the centres of St Asaph, Abergele, Colwyn Bay and Conway. Would it really be better to have all that traffic choking the narrow streets of Conway?


Yes, it would be if it means I have to take a detour to get to the Crooked Horn in Brynford, or if I have to cross a four lane highway to take my dog on the moors, yes, it's a bloody inconvenience. It's OK for you, Lancashire is already knackered. But Wales hasn't gone to pot yet, and we want to keep it that way. At least when the roads were congested, speeders were frustrated.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 08:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
basingwerk wrote:
millsee wrote:
improvements to the Bryn Dinas junction on the cathederal. You know, those improvement that were finished last year.


These horrid (I hesitate to use the word) improvements have blighted the grounds of the Cathedral, for God's sake! And they attract yet more heavy goods traffic through the city.

[/code]


Blimey. The roundabout nicked the corner off the cathederal grounds. Hardly anything really. Blighted :D

At least the HGVs won't get stuck on the Bryn any more, and they can come off the A55 at the bottom of Rhuallt Hill, rather than having to negotiate the High Street. Hence, have REDUCED HGVs along the High Street. (Source: my parents who own a shop on the High Street).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 13:56 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
millsee wrote:
At least the HGVs won't get stuck on the Bryn any more, and they can come off the A55 at the bottom of Rhuallt Hill


i.e. through another narrow, winding road.

millsee wrote:
rather than having to negotiate the High Street. Hence, have REDUCED HGVs along the High Street. (Source: my parents who own a shop on the High Street).


And increased them next to the primary school AND the secondary school, and the hospital and Bishops Walk housing estate and (most importantly) the Bryn Dinas pub. I can't imagine where they recruit thier planners. All they do is open up more routes to heavy trucks.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 14:43 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
basingwerk wrote:
millsee wrote:
At least the HGVs won't get stuck on the Bryn any more, and they can come off the A55 at the bottom of Rhuallt Hill


i.e. through another narrow, winding road.

millsee wrote:
rather than having to negotiate the High Street. Hence, have REDUCED HGVs along the High Street. (Source: my parents who own a shop on the High Street).


And increased them next to the primary school AND the secondary school, and the hospital and Bishops Walk housing estate and (most importantly) the Bryn Dinas pub. I can't imagine where they recruit thier planners. All they do is open up more routes to heavy trucks.



The "narrow winding road" was realigned as far as possible for HGVs until you get to the parked cars outside the old coal yard - are you suggesting parking restrictions there? I hope not for economic reasons.

The primary and secondary school you emotively mention (*won't SOMEBODY think of the children* :roll: ) are AFTER the new roundabout at the cathederal. The only way to avoid them would be up the S-bends on the lower Denbigh Road (WHOLLY unsuitable) or a new road up the "beautful Elwy valley".

What evidence do you have that HGV flows have increased on the Upper Denbigh Road? There are no permanent counters down there. Either prove or withdraw your claim.

Fundamentally, I really don't understand your point as you are shifting opinion with every post. There is nothing wrong with my fellow transport planners at Denbs CC, most of whom are ex-colleagues.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 15:51 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
millsee wrote:
The only way to avoid them would be up the S-bends on the lower Denbigh Road (WHOLLY unsuitable) or a new road up the "beautful Elwy valley"


Typical planner. Before, the road was too narrow for trucks, so they didn't come through. Period. Now they do, so things are worse.

millsee wrote:
What evidence do you have that HGV flows have increased on the Upper Denbigh Road?


A pint in the Bryn is enough. Just look out of the window, you chump!

millsee wrote:
Either prove or withdraw your claim.


I could say the same to you.

PS. The "narrow winding road" route is only a half junction because because another generation of planners didn't complete it at the A55 end. You didn't mention that, did you? So at very best, it only solves half the problem because returning trucks DO have to go down the main street!

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 18:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
basingwerk wrote:
millsee wrote:
The only way to avoid them would be up the S-bends on the lower Denbigh Road (WHOLLY unsuitable) or a new road up the "beautful Elwy valley"


Typical planner. Before, the road was too narrow for trucks, so they didn't come through. Period. Now they do, so things are worse.

millsee wrote:
What evidence do you have that HGV flows have increased on the Upper Denbigh Road?


A pint in the Bryn is enough. Just look out of the window, you chump!

millsee wrote:
Either prove or withdraw your claim.


I could say the same to you.

PS. The "narrow winding road" route is only a half junction because because another generation of planners didn't complete it at the A55 end. You didn't mention that, did you? So at very best, it only solves half the problem because returning trucks DO have to go down the main street!


This is beyond belief! I thought you were being ignorant, but this is just plain dumb!

You are seriously arguing that since the lower denbigh road is a historic road, laid out around 1900, hence it wasn't designed for HGVs that we should do.. erm...what?

How else would you service Denbigh and Ruthin? By air? Or the underground? Have some sense - you are making yourself look ridiculous.

Your pint in the bryn will tell you more HGVs are using the high street and turning up the upper denbigh road, does it? Well, that's convinced me. What you mean is you have no evidence and you are therefore withdrawing your falsehood - and your pathetic insult.

(Incidentally, last time I was in the bryn you couldn't see out of the windows down the high street - has the pub moved since last week?)

And what claims have I made that you wish me to withdraw?

What is the nonsense in your last paragraph? Half a junction? Half a problem? At least make some sense so your rather laughable and moronic comments can be answered.

Either that or stop digging that hole that you are in. :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 19:04 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
millsee wrote:
dumb! ridiculous!


Hardly a way to win allies, millsee. You'll have to change your ways if you want to get on.

millsee wrote:
You are seriously arguing that since the lower denbigh road is a historic road, laid out around 1900, hence it wasn't designed for HGVs that we should do.. erm...what?


No, not at all. Why do you suggest that?

millsee wrote:
How else would you service Denbigh and Ruthin? By air? Or the underground?


I wouldn't!

millsee wrote:
Your pint in the bryn will tell you more HGVs are using the high street and turning up the upper denbigh road, does it? Well, that's convinced me. What you mean is you have no evidence and you are therefore withdrawing your falsehood - and your pathetic insult.


Think yourself lucky I didn't call you dumb and ridiculous. I just called you a chump, which means easily deceived.

millsee wrote:
Incidentally, last time I was in the bryn you couldn't see out of the windows down the high street - has the pub moved since last week?


Yes, those extra trucks shake it to it’s foundations. Don’t like the new colour much, do you?

millsee wrote:
And what claims have I made that you wish me to withdraw?


You claim that you are not a chump, yet you work in planning and call concerned locals dumb and ridiculous, laughable and moronic. Start there and work up.

millsee wrote:
What is the nonsense in your last paragraph? Half a junction? Half a problem? At least make some sense so your rather laughable and moronic comments can be answered. Either that or stop digging that hole that you are in. :lol:


Hm.. I wonder if you have ever been down past the station. Check it out on the map, millsee, and you might notice something about that junction – yes, you can’t turn towards Chester, can you? You don’t even know the layout and there you are shouting the odds!

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 21:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
basingwerk wrote:

Hardly a way to win allies, millsee. You'll have to change your ways if you want to get on.



Oh please be my ally please. Then you might start answering my questions, or making sense.

basingwerk wrote:

No, not at all. Why do you suggest that?



Because the posts you have made imply that you think you know all the answers.

basingwerk wrote:

I wouldn't!



How would you do it then? Leave the towns to die? Ridiculous. Good job you have no authority.

basingwerk wrote:

Think yourself lucky I didn't call you dumb and ridiculous. I just called you a chump, which means easily deceived.




Hmm. Another ridiculous statement.


basingwerk wrote:

Yes, those extra trucks shake it to it’s foundations. Don’t like the new colour much, do you?



Latest research shows, contrary to popular belief, that vibrations from traffic have little to no structural effect on buidlings. Fancy digging the research out that proves otherwise, or are you simply making more dumb claims with no proof? As for the colour, I much preferred the sticky floors and the horrible beer. Have you seen the cock doctor lately? Still winning is she?

basingwerk wrote:

You claim that you are not a chump, yet you work in planning and call concerned locals dumb and ridiculous, laughable and moronic. Start there and work up.



Nope Not all of them. Just you, pal.

And I work in planning do I? News to me.

basingwerk wrote:

Hm.. I wonder if you have ever been down past the station. Check it out on the map, millsee, and you might notice something about that junction – yes, you can’t turn towards Chester, can you? You don’t even know the layout and there you are shouting the odds!


Oh, you mean the left-in left-out junction at the bottom of Rhuallt Hill. Make it clearer next time please. One of my jobs in designing that interchange (remember when the road was realigned?) was a cost-benefit alalysis of providing an overbridge. It was considered unnecessary due to the proximity of the talardy roundabout, and the unacceptable environmental impact such a construction would have. If you REALLY know the area, you'll know what I am talking about.

Are you keeping up, chump?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 10:30 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
millsee wrote:
basingwerk wrote:
I wouldn't!


How would you do it then? Leave the towns to die? Ridiculous. Good job you have no authority


millsee, authority is a privilege earned by civil servants and granted by the people who foot their wages, i.e. the tax payers. It is a good job that you are an engineer working to requirements, and not a planner. Angry outbursts do not earn authority and certainly don't change opinions. They have had their way with the Cathedral, but I don't want more truck traffic from the A55 through St Asaph streets. I would certainly prefer the status quo than to turn the vale into rural version of Shotton and Connahs Quay, or (God forbid) Wrexham.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 11:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
millsee wrote:
about Basingwerk...

Fundamentally, I really don't understand your point as you are shifting opinion with every post.


That's his style millsee!

Admit it for once BW that you have come up against someone with significantly more knowledge and practical experience in the field. You'd argue your way out of a paper bag rather than accept you are in the wrong for once.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 11:32 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
r11co wrote:
Admit it for once BW that you have come up against someone with significantly more knowledge and practical experience in the field. You'd argue your way out of a paper bag rather than accept you are in the wrong for once.


I really don't want more traffic up the high street nor past the schools, and I hate to see the grounds of the Cathedral blighted by millsee’s chums. But let us establish your credentials to comment, r11co. What is the name of the garage at the bottom of the high street, and why does it have that name? And what is the first name of it's proprietor. You'd have to be local to know that.

Hm.. are you stuck? Perhaps you don't know much about St Asaph after all, and can't comment on it's road system, eh? Come on, at last you have to admit it r11co, you’re just making trouble, aren’t you, you naughty, naughty person?

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
basingwerk wrote:
Hm.. are you stuck? Perhaps you don't know much about St Asaph after all, and can't comment on it's road system, eh? Come on, at last you have to admit it r11co, you’re just making trouble, aren’t you, you naughty, naughty person?


I'm not involved in this discussion. I am merely reading the posts of two individuals and drawing conclusions, based on those posts, as to which of the two individuals is more knowledgable about the situation being discussed, as is everyone else reading your discourse...

:roll:

Another diversionary non-argument from Basingwerk.......


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:46 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 19:41
Posts: 201
Location: North East Wales
basingwerk wrote:
Quote:
Perhaps you don't know much about St Asaph after all, and can't comment on it's road system, eh? Come on, at last you have to admit it r11co, you’re just making trouble, aren’t you, you naughty, naughty person?


Its a while since you lived there basingwerk you naughty naughty troblemaking person yourself

millsee wrote
Quote:
Edites to say: where on earth is he A14? It's not in North Wales


basingwerk wrote:
Quote:
That's right. Today, Wales is a good place to live but a crap place to work. These roads cause lots of unnecessary journeys in pursuit of Mammon, and are ruining the countryside at the same time. If things go on as they are, in 50 years we could end up in the same situation as England - a good place to work but a crap place to live.


The A14 is near where basingwerk actually lives having actually left Wales for Cambs quite a long time ago in pursuit of mammon himself.

Actually I still live in Wales and work in Wales. If the A55 improvements had not been built there would be nose to tail traffic 24/7 through Hawarden where I work. We need communications to survive and some of us actually want to earn our keep pursuing our careers.

Most of us recognise the money grubbing antics and hypocrisy of the loacl Arrive Alive for what they are. There is no-one here in a high-tech company of 15 who has not yet been hit with a NIP. Even those here who used to claim that " all you had to do was stick to the law " have been entrapped and now realise what its about and hate Arrive Alive and current policy for it.

As for you my old 'chump' it seems if you are given enough opportunity you tie youself in knots and provide entertainment for us all :lol: .


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:47 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
r11co wrote:
I am merely ...


harping negatively from the sidelines? You don't have to put up with the Industrial Despoliation. Look, I know these people mean well, but millsee didn’t know the A14 and the A55 were linked into the same part of theTrans-European transport network, which provided funds. For goodness sake, he acts like an authority on it, he has even worked on the road and he can’t see the bigger picture.

If you ever intend to visit the vale, do so soon, before these highway guys turn it all to asphalt and it looks like Hull!

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 13:38
Posts: 16
Location: London/Sevenoaks
Question for basingwerk

I cannot name my local garage - I can tell you the dealership and what sort of petrol it sells.

I do not know the name so could not tell you why it is called what it is called.

I have no idea who owns the garage.

Does this make me ineligible to comment on my local roads?

_________________
tanj There Ain't No Justice


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:52 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
basingwerk wrote:
If you ever intend to visit the vale, do so soon, before these highway guys turn it all to asphalt and it looks like Hull!


:lol:

You almost tempted me.... :roll:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 14:00 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Richard C wrote:
The A14 is near where basingwerk actually lives having actually left Wales for Cambs quite a long time ago in pursuit of mammon himself.


Ah, another old 'friend' letting himself down by harping negatively from the sidelines. We sold up in 2003 because my wife's parents were frail and needed looking after. They passed away last spring. My relations and friends still live in St Asaph and Holywell, and I keep a bed there in Bishop's walk, where the extra traffic rumbles along the Denbigh Road.

Richard C wrote:
would be nose to tail traffic 24/7 through Hawarden where I work


If these people have thier way, the rest of north Wales will be as bad as Queensferry, Shotton, Connah's Quay, which have gone to pot completely. Flint is hardly better.

Richard C wrote:
There is no-one here in a high-tech company of 15 who has not yet been hit with a NIP


The roads are safer than they were, then?

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.101s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]