Common sense wrote:
Ridiculous, how many different forms of negligence are there?
How can you possibly even attempt to treat it individually based on the one circumstance it is in i.e. the roads.
It seems rather like putting both your hands either side of your face and only viewing one chosen part of the problem.
Merely stating because its a road saftey forum hardly backs up your argument. It obviously has wider ramifications which Id have thought any intelligent person couldn't possibly try and seperate or ignore.
What the bloody hell are you gibbering on about?
OK, next time I want to start a topic, I'll PM you with the gist of it just to make sure I don't exclude anything
you happen to think is important. At least that way you can't accuse me of ignoring your personal take on things becuase I'm not psychic.
In fact, I'd better PM the whole forum membership, you never know what direction someone might wish to take a discussion in, and I might be accused of being blinkered because I didn't have the foresight to include it in the first place
Or better still, why not take a leaf out of your own book and use a bit of that stuff you've chosen for you forum name
BTW, if you wish to introduce another 'take' on a subject there are polite ways of doing it e.g.,
Rigpig, how about the similarities between road negligence and other negligence,
Is surely better than...
<Equivalent to poke in chest> Why are you blinkered towards motorists?