They go on about "safe route planning"
They are missing the peer preasure problem that it is "not cool" to take the safe route
Parkour is in, safety is out.
They have no wish or will to be model pedestrians and there is a culture of the
"car driver is at fault"
The "safe route parenting"... assumes that the parent sets a role model of taking the safest route. For the last 10 or more years the goverment has been closing subways and bridges and assuming people will use crossing points with no safety campaign to back that up. so where will the parents have got thier education?
The report correctly picks up the point that road saftey is somthing that they "did at primary school" This backs up the "uncool" image of being safe.
the report states that "marginal decisions are uncorrected by feedback"
The whole report assumes that these people were trying to avoid harm. When what I see is people who run out and expect you to avoid them.
Or people who choose to walk in the road wherte there is a servicable footpath.
This report goes on about peoples use of a crossing and car speed perception. What they need to tackle is getting people to use the crossing in the first place. The buggers arejumping over three sets of railings to cross the roadrather than walk 50m more
_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV
Snap Unhappy“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code