graball wrote:
Quote:
I'd always pull out fully into the oncoming lane before putting my foot down to overtake.
Botach's right though, this is a very un-productive way to overtake. Assuming you are following the 2 second rule, by doing a 90degree pull out,it is going to take the average car several seconds to even reach the back of the car that you are about to overtake, making the whole overtake manoeuvre very long winded and needing a very long stretch of straight road, especially if you cut back in at 90degrees too.
The normal overtake method is to close the gap on the lead car by accelerating to close the 2 second gap then overtake at approximately a 45degree angle and cut back in at 45degrees, which works fine so long as someone doesn't brake at the last moment to close that gap down to the bare minimum.
Exactly the problem that we are talking about avoiding.
Let me explain this overtaking method (better (without masses of detail!!) ... or I will try.
Car ahead, overtake planned. Clear road (as applies to either method). Drop a gear or two (unless in correct gear), gently pull out to 'on-coming lane), at 45% etc as you wish (there is no 90% possible that I know of !
), then with full confirmation that all is still 100% safe to overtake, you apply good acceleration to quickly pass the vehicle and then after a decent gap pull back in (usually 2secs), gently.
It is used in high performance driving often but it can often afford a better visual line in many circumstances as you are already on the 'oncoming side of the road'. This works very well for lorry overtaking etc.... I hope that helps? It does demand a vehicle that can accelerate quickly. It would be rare to overtake this way using a less powerful vehicle.