Essentially, it’s about how any driver that’s potentially driving at an unsafe speed can look squeaky driving licence clean just because of where they hang out.
There’s the usual type on there of course, banging on about how speeders deserve what they get and speed kills and blah blah blah, but I’m sure they would be the first to complain if they didn’t get their local provisions because good long distance drivers have been banned over the totting up procedure or they can’t get the taxi, the Chinese grub delivery, their son or daughter cant visit etc.
Why these same people they always dig up from under a rock are never asked something like "this wide road is deserted with no parked cars or children so how can this road which was previously a
be so dangerous for a speeding driver now doing 35 mph in a
? No, they don't dare ask that because it's a loaded question which
should be asked but which wouldn't elicit the answer they're looking for. They always load the questions in
their favour; never with impartiality.
TBH I thought Dom was going to end by saying something in support of the scameras, like all these insidious programs tend to. But, to his credit, instead it was about the unfairness of the current system and in his own words "More to do with where you live than how you drive".
If that is true, and this program shows it's incontrovertible, then how much more unfair can you get?
(
Waits for someone to say "if everyone never ever speeds it's fair to all". )